通过比较电阻点焊中的破坏性测试方法验证精确焊缝直径的研究

IF 2.4 4区 材料科学 Q2 METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING Welding in the World Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1007/s40194-024-01747-z
Christian Mathiszik, Johannes Koal, Jörg Zschetzsche, Uwe Füssel, Hans Christian Schmale
{"title":"通过比较电阻点焊中的破坏性测试方法验证精确焊缝直径的研究","authors":"Christian Mathiszik,&nbsp;Johannes Koal,&nbsp;Jörg Zschetzsche,&nbsp;Uwe Füssel,&nbsp;Hans Christian Schmale","doi":"10.1007/s40194-024-01747-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The torsion test is rarely used for resistance spot-welded joints since they are not subjected to torsion in applications. Normal, shear, and/or peel loads are usually the main stresses. Extensive scientific investigations in the context of Kunsmann’s dissertation date back more than 50 years. These investigations are still the basis of ISO 17653 and the German guideline DVS 2916-1. Recent scientific investigations only use torsion tests, but do not describe the reason for its use. A decisive advantage of the torsion test over the other standardized destructive testing methods lies in the types of fracture modes that occur and the properties of the fracture surfaces. Torsional loading results in either interfacial or button-pulled fracture modes. No material residues occur on the fracture surfaces for ductile and advanced high-strength steels. Hence, the measurement of weld diameter is achievable with minimal constraints, resulting in reduced variability and facilitating objective assessments of spot welds. This article delineates these attributes through a comparative analysis of various destructive testing methods employing statistical approaches. Additionally, the article expounds on the design concept of the developed rig for conducting torsion tests on spot welds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":809,"journal":{"name":"Welding in the World","volume":"68 7","pages":"1825 - 1835"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40194-024-01747-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on precise weld diameter validations by comparing destructive testing methods in resistance spot welding\",\"authors\":\"Christian Mathiszik,&nbsp;Johannes Koal,&nbsp;Jörg Zschetzsche,&nbsp;Uwe Füssel,&nbsp;Hans Christian Schmale\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40194-024-01747-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The torsion test is rarely used for resistance spot-welded joints since they are not subjected to torsion in applications. Normal, shear, and/or peel loads are usually the main stresses. Extensive scientific investigations in the context of Kunsmann’s dissertation date back more than 50 years. These investigations are still the basis of ISO 17653 and the German guideline DVS 2916-1. Recent scientific investigations only use torsion tests, but do not describe the reason for its use. A decisive advantage of the torsion test over the other standardized destructive testing methods lies in the types of fracture modes that occur and the properties of the fracture surfaces. Torsional loading results in either interfacial or button-pulled fracture modes. No material residues occur on the fracture surfaces for ductile and advanced high-strength steels. Hence, the measurement of weld diameter is achievable with minimal constraints, resulting in reduced variability and facilitating objective assessments of spot welds. This article delineates these attributes through a comparative analysis of various destructive testing methods employing statistical approaches. Additionally, the article expounds on the design concept of the developed rig for conducting torsion tests on spot welds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Welding in the World\",\"volume\":\"68 7\",\"pages\":\"1825 - 1835\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40194-024-01747-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Welding in the World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40194-024-01747-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Welding in the World","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40194-024-01747-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

扭转试验很少用于电阻点焊接头,因为它们在应用中不会受到扭转。法向、剪切和/或剥离载荷通常是主要应力。根据 Kunsmann 的论文进行的广泛科学研究可追溯到 50 多年前。这些研究仍然是 ISO 17653 和德国 DVS 2916-1 指南的基础。最近的科学研究只使用了扭转试验,但没有说明使用扭转试验的原因。与其他标准化破坏性试验方法相比,扭转试验的决定性优势在于发生断裂的模式类型和断裂面的特性。扭转加载会导致界面断裂或按钮拉伸断裂模式。韧性钢和高级高强度钢的断裂表面不会出现材料残留。因此,在测量焊缝直径时只需最小的限制,从而减少了变异性,有利于对点焊进行客观评估。本文通过采用统计方法对各种破坏性测试方法进行比较分析,对这些特性进行了描述。此外,文章还阐述了所开发的对点焊缝进行扭转测试的钻机的设计理念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study on precise weld diameter validations by comparing destructive testing methods in resistance spot welding

The torsion test is rarely used for resistance spot-welded joints since they are not subjected to torsion in applications. Normal, shear, and/or peel loads are usually the main stresses. Extensive scientific investigations in the context of Kunsmann’s dissertation date back more than 50 years. These investigations are still the basis of ISO 17653 and the German guideline DVS 2916-1. Recent scientific investigations only use torsion tests, but do not describe the reason for its use. A decisive advantage of the torsion test over the other standardized destructive testing methods lies in the types of fracture modes that occur and the properties of the fracture surfaces. Torsional loading results in either interfacial or button-pulled fracture modes. No material residues occur on the fracture surfaces for ductile and advanced high-strength steels. Hence, the measurement of weld diameter is achievable with minimal constraints, resulting in reduced variability and facilitating objective assessments of spot welds. This article delineates these attributes through a comparative analysis of various destructive testing methods employing statistical approaches. Additionally, the article expounds on the design concept of the developed rig for conducting torsion tests on spot welds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Welding in the World
Welding in the World METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Welding in the World publishes authoritative papers on every aspect of materials joining, including welding, brazing, soldering, cutting, thermal spraying and allied joining and fabrication techniques.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility study on machine learning methods for prediction of process-related parameters during WAAM process using SS-316L filler material Publisher Correction: Novel approach for in-line process monitoring during ultrasonic metal welding of dissimilar wire/terminal joints based on the thermoelectric effect Life cycle assessment in additive manufacturing of copper alloys—comparison between laser and electron beam Effect of Cr addition on microstructure, mechanical properties, and corrosion behavior of weld metal in weathering steel of high-speed train bogie Influence of travel speed on porosity and liquation cracking in cold wire pulsed gas metal arc welding of aa7075-t651 aluminum alloy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1