间质性肺病患者的体育锻炼指导:随机对照试验。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Chronic Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/14799731241235231
Sofie Breuls, Tamara Zlamalova, Katerina Raisova, Astrid Blondeel, Marieke Wuyts, Martin Dvoracek, Monika Zurkova, Jonas Yserbyt, Wim Janssens, Wim Wuyts, Thierry Troosters, Heleen Demeyer
{"title":"间质性肺病患者的体育锻炼指导:随机对照试验。","authors":"Sofie Breuls, Tamara Zlamalova, Katerina Raisova, Astrid Blondeel, Marieke Wuyts, Martin Dvoracek, Monika Zurkova, Jonas Yserbyt, Wim Janssens, Wim Wuyts, Thierry Troosters, Heleen Demeyer","doi":"10.1177/14799731241235231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Physical activity is reduced in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and physical inactivity is related to poor health outcomes. We investigated the effect of a telecoaching intervention to improve physical activity in patients with ILD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty patients with ILD were randomized into the intervention or control group. Patients in the intervention group received a 12-week telecoaching program including a step counter, a patient-tailored smartphone application, and coaching calls. Patients in the control group received usual care. Physical activity (primary outcome), physical fitness and quality of life were measured at baseline and 12 weeks later with an accelerometer, 6-min walking test and quadriceps muscle force and the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participation in telecoaching did not improve physical activity: between-group differences for step count: 386 ± 590 steps/day, <i>p</i> = .52; sedentary time: 4 ± 18 min/day, <i>p</i> = .81; movement intensity: 0.04 ± 0.05 m/s<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = .45). Between-group differences for the 6-min walking test, quadriceps muscle force and K-BILD were 14 ± 10 m, <i>p</i> = .16; 2 ± 3% predicted, <i>p</i> = .61; 0.8 ± 1.7 points, <i>p</i> = .62 respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Twelve weeks of telecoaching did not improve physical activity, physical fitness or quality of life in patients with ILD. Future physical or behavioural interventions are needed for these patients to improve physical activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10956148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical activity coaching in patients with interstitial lung diseases: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sofie Breuls, Tamara Zlamalova, Katerina Raisova, Astrid Blondeel, Marieke Wuyts, Martin Dvoracek, Monika Zurkova, Jonas Yserbyt, Wim Janssens, Wim Wuyts, Thierry Troosters, Heleen Demeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14799731241235231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Physical activity is reduced in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and physical inactivity is related to poor health outcomes. We investigated the effect of a telecoaching intervention to improve physical activity in patients with ILD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty patients with ILD were randomized into the intervention or control group. Patients in the intervention group received a 12-week telecoaching program including a step counter, a patient-tailored smartphone application, and coaching calls. Patients in the control group received usual care. Physical activity (primary outcome), physical fitness and quality of life were measured at baseline and 12 weeks later with an accelerometer, 6-min walking test and quadriceps muscle force and the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participation in telecoaching did not improve physical activity: between-group differences for step count: 386 ± 590 steps/day, <i>p</i> = .52; sedentary time: 4 ± 18 min/day, <i>p</i> = .81; movement intensity: 0.04 ± 0.05 m/s<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = .45). Between-group differences for the 6-min walking test, quadriceps muscle force and K-BILD were 14 ± 10 m, <i>p</i> = .16; 2 ± 3% predicted, <i>p</i> = .61; 0.8 ± 1.7 points, <i>p</i> = .62 respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Twelve weeks of telecoaching did not improve physical activity, physical fitness or quality of life in patients with ILD. Future physical or behavioural interventions are needed for these patients to improve physical activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10956148/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731241235231\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731241235231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:间质性肺病(ILD)患者的体力活动减少,而缺乏体力活动与不良的健康后果有关。我们研究了远程教学干预对改善 ILD 患者体育锻炼的效果:80名ILD患者被随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组患者接受为期 12 周的远程指导计划,包括计步器、为患者量身定制的智能手机应用程序和指导电话。对照组患者接受常规护理。在基线和12周后,使用加速度计、6分钟步行测试、股四头肌肌力和国王间质性肺病简明问卷(K-BILD)测量体力活动(主要结果)、体能和生活质量:结果:参加远程教学并没有提高体力活动量:步数的组间差异为 386 ± 590 步/天:386 ± 590 步/天,p = .52;久坐时间:4 ± 18 分钟/天,p = .52:4 ± 18 分钟/天,p = .81;运动强度:0.04 ± 0.05 m/s2,p = .45)。6 分钟步行测试、股四头肌肌力和 K-BILD 的组间差异分别为:14 ± 10 米,p = .16;2 ± 3% 预测值,p = .61;0.8 ± 1.7 分,p = .62:为期 12 周的远程指导并未改善 ILD 患者的体育活动、体能或生活质量。今后需要对这些患者进行身体或行为干预,以改善他们的体育锻炼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physical activity coaching in patients with interstitial lung diseases: A randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: Physical activity is reduced in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and physical inactivity is related to poor health outcomes. We investigated the effect of a telecoaching intervention to improve physical activity in patients with ILD.

Methods: Eighty patients with ILD were randomized into the intervention or control group. Patients in the intervention group received a 12-week telecoaching program including a step counter, a patient-tailored smartphone application, and coaching calls. Patients in the control group received usual care. Physical activity (primary outcome), physical fitness and quality of life were measured at baseline and 12 weeks later with an accelerometer, 6-min walking test and quadriceps muscle force and the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD).

Results: Participation in telecoaching did not improve physical activity: between-group differences for step count: 386 ± 590 steps/day, p = .52; sedentary time: 4 ± 18 min/day, p = .81; movement intensity: 0.04 ± 0.05 m/s2, p = .45). Between-group differences for the 6-min walking test, quadriceps muscle force and K-BILD were 14 ± 10 m, p = .16; 2 ± 3% predicted, p = .61; 0.8 ± 1.7 points, p = .62 respectively.

Conclusions: Twelve weeks of telecoaching did not improve physical activity, physical fitness or quality of life in patients with ILD. Future physical or behavioural interventions are needed for these patients to improve physical activity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
期刊最新文献
Quantifying uptake and completion of pulmonary rehabilitation programs in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease known to tertiary care. Navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences and self-management approaches adopted by people with interstitial lung disease. Relationship between dust allergen sensitization and cardiac autonomic function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respiratory impairments in patients suffering from Fabry disease - A cross-sectional study. Two-year diffusion capacity trajectory in COVID-19 pneumonia survivors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1