对未参加综合治疗的成人肥胖症患者进行低负担的自我称重干预,以防止体重增加。

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Science & Practice Pub Date : 2024-03-20 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1002/osp4.745
Megan A McVay, Montserrat Carrera Seoane, Melinda Rajoria, Marissa Dye, Natalie Marshall, Sofia Muenyi, Anas Alkanderi, Kellie B Scotti, Jaime Ruiz, Corrine I Voils, Kathryn M Ross
{"title":"对未参加综合治疗的成人肥胖症患者进行低负担的自我称重干预,以防止体重增加。","authors":"Megan A McVay, Montserrat Carrera Seoane, Melinda Rajoria, Marissa Dye, Natalie Marshall, Sofia Muenyi, Anas Alkanderi, Kellie B Scotti, Jaime Ruiz, Corrine I Voils, Kathryn M Ross","doi":"10.1002/osp4.745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For individuals who are eligible but unlikely to join comprehensive weight loss programs, a low burden self-weighing intervention may be a more acceptable approach to weight management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-arm feasibility trial of a 12-month self-weighing intervention. Participants were healthcare patients with a BMI ≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> with a weight-related comorbidity or a BMI >30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> who reported lack of interest in joining a comprehensive weight loss program, or did not enroll in a comprehensive program after being provided program information. In the self-weighing intervention, participants were asked to weigh themselves daily on a cellular connected scale and were sent text messages every other week with tailored weight change feedback, including messages encouraging use of comprehensive programs if weight gain occurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 86 eligible patients, 39 enrolled (45.3%) in the self-weighing intervention. Self-weighing occurred on average 4.6 days/week (SD = 1.4). At 12 months, 12 participants (30.8%) lost ≥3% baseline weight, 11 (28.2%) experienced weight stability (±3% baseline), 6 (15.4%) gained ≥3% of baseline weight, and 10 (25.6%) did not have available weight data to evaluate. Three participants reported joining a weight loss program during the intervention (7.7%). Participants reported high intervention satisfaction in quantitative ratings (4.1 of 5), and qualitative interviews identified areas of satisfaction (e.g., timing and content of text messages) and areas for improvement (e.g., increasing personalization of text messages).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A low-burden self-weighing intervention can reach adults with overweight/obesity who would be unlikely to engage in comprehensive weight loss programs; the efficacy of this intervention for preventing weight gain should be further evaluated in a randomized trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"10 2","pages":"e745"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10951869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A low-burden, self-weighing intervention to prevent weight gain in adults with obesity who do not enroll in comprehensive treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Megan A McVay, Montserrat Carrera Seoane, Melinda Rajoria, Marissa Dye, Natalie Marshall, Sofia Muenyi, Anas Alkanderi, Kellie B Scotti, Jaime Ruiz, Corrine I Voils, Kathryn M Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/osp4.745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For individuals who are eligible but unlikely to join comprehensive weight loss programs, a low burden self-weighing intervention may be a more acceptable approach to weight management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-arm feasibility trial of a 12-month self-weighing intervention. Participants were healthcare patients with a BMI ≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> with a weight-related comorbidity or a BMI >30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> who reported lack of interest in joining a comprehensive weight loss program, or did not enroll in a comprehensive program after being provided program information. In the self-weighing intervention, participants were asked to weigh themselves daily on a cellular connected scale and were sent text messages every other week with tailored weight change feedback, including messages encouraging use of comprehensive programs if weight gain occurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 86 eligible patients, 39 enrolled (45.3%) in the self-weighing intervention. Self-weighing occurred on average 4.6 days/week (SD = 1.4). At 12 months, 12 participants (30.8%) lost ≥3% baseline weight, 11 (28.2%) experienced weight stability (±3% baseline), 6 (15.4%) gained ≥3% of baseline weight, and 10 (25.6%) did not have available weight data to evaluate. Three participants reported joining a weight loss program during the intervention (7.7%). Participants reported high intervention satisfaction in quantitative ratings (4.1 of 5), and qualitative interviews identified areas of satisfaction (e.g., timing and content of text messages) and areas for improvement (e.g., increasing personalization of text messages).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A low-burden self-weighing intervention can reach adults with overweight/obesity who would be unlikely to engage in comprehensive weight loss programs; the efficacy of this intervention for preventing weight gain should be further evaluated in a randomized trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Science & Practice\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"e745\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10951869/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Science & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于符合条件但不太可能参加综合减肥计划的人来说,低负担的自我称重干预可能是一种更容易接受的体重管理方法:这是一项为期 12 个月的自我称重干预的单臂可行性试验。参与者为体重指数(BMI)≥25 kg/m2且合并体重相关疾病或体重指数(BMI)>30 kg/m2的医护人员,他们表示对参加综合减肥计划缺乏兴趣,或在获得计划信息后未参加综合计划。在自我称重干预中,要求参与者每天用手机连接的体重秤称重,并每隔一周发送一次短信,提供量身定制的体重变化反馈,包括在体重增加时鼓励使用综合计划的信息:在 86 名符合条件的患者中,39 人(45.3%)参加了自我称重干预。平均每周自我称重 4.6 天(SD = 1.4)。12 个月时,12 名参与者(30.8%)体重下降≥3%,11 名参与者(28.2%)体重稳定(±3%),6 名参与者(15.4%)体重增加≥3%,10 名参与者(25.6%)没有可用的体重数据可供评估。有 3 名参与者表示在干预期间参加了减肥计划(7.7%)。在定量评分中,参与者对干预的满意度较高(4.1 分,满分为 5 分),定性访谈则指出了满意的方面(如短信的时间和内容)和需要改进的方面(如增加短信的个性化):低负担的自我称重干预措施可以帮助那些不太可能参与全面减肥计划的超重/肥胖成年人;这种干预措施在防止体重增加方面的效果应在随机试验中进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A low-burden, self-weighing intervention to prevent weight gain in adults with obesity who do not enroll in comprehensive treatment.

Background: For individuals who are eligible but unlikely to join comprehensive weight loss programs, a low burden self-weighing intervention may be a more acceptable approach to weight management.

Methods: This was a single-arm feasibility trial of a 12-month self-weighing intervention. Participants were healthcare patients with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 with a weight-related comorbidity or a BMI >30 kg/m2 who reported lack of interest in joining a comprehensive weight loss program, or did not enroll in a comprehensive program after being provided program information. In the self-weighing intervention, participants were asked to weigh themselves daily on a cellular connected scale and were sent text messages every other week with tailored weight change feedback, including messages encouraging use of comprehensive programs if weight gain occurred.

Results: Of 86 eligible patients, 39 enrolled (45.3%) in the self-weighing intervention. Self-weighing occurred on average 4.6 days/week (SD = 1.4). At 12 months, 12 participants (30.8%) lost ≥3% baseline weight, 11 (28.2%) experienced weight stability (±3% baseline), 6 (15.4%) gained ≥3% of baseline weight, and 10 (25.6%) did not have available weight data to evaluate. Three participants reported joining a weight loss program during the intervention (7.7%). Participants reported high intervention satisfaction in quantitative ratings (4.1 of 5), and qualitative interviews identified areas of satisfaction (e.g., timing and content of text messages) and areas for improvement (e.g., increasing personalization of text messages).

Conclusion: A low-burden self-weighing intervention can reach adults with overweight/obesity who would be unlikely to engage in comprehensive weight loss programs; the efficacy of this intervention for preventing weight gain should be further evaluated in a randomized trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Behavioral weight loss interventions in college health centers: A qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators to implementation. A Novel and Comprehensive Wellness Assessment for Lifestyle-Based Interventions. Results of a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial using counseling to augment a digital weight loss program. Predictors of ongoing attendance at an Australian publicly funded specialist obesity service. The impact of weight self-stigma on weight-loss treatment engagement and outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1