Noha Yahia Ebaid, Mostafa Mohamad Assy, Ahmed M Alaa Eldin
{"title":"简略乳腺 MRI 在诊断乳腺癌中的诊断有效性:使用 BI-RADS 与完整乳腺 MRI 方案的比较研究。","authors":"Noha Yahia Ebaid, Mostafa Mohamad Assy, Ahmed M Alaa Eldin","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2024.135474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This work aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast abbreviated protocol (AP) in diagnosing malignant breast lesions using BI-RADS compared with the diagnostic accuracy of the full diagnostic protocol (FDP).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective single-centre study was conducted. A total of 125 female patients with suspicious breast masses underwent MRI with the AP and the FDP. The images of AP and FDP were independently interpreted by 2 radiologists with 10 years of experience in breast imaging, and any disagreement was resolved with a third one. Using the histopathological examination as a reference test, the diagnostic effectiveness of both FDP and AP in breast cancer screening was calculated. ROC curve was utilised to estimate the optimal BI-RADS cut-off for prediction of malignancy. The difference in image interpretation time between both protocols was estimated using the Mann-Whitney test. Moreover, the inter-test agreement between both protocols was assessed using Cohen's κ test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 83 malignant and 42 benign lesions. AP indicated a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 90.5%, 96.4%, and 94.4%, while the FDP showed a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 92.9%, 100%, and 97.6%, respectively. BI-RADS 3 category was the best cut-off for prediction of malignancy. There was a significant difference between both protocols concerning the interpretation time (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was excellent agreement between both protocols, with a κ of 0.915.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Breast MRI AP may be employed instead of FDP to identify breast cancer with similar diagnostic performance. Moreover, it reduces the interpretation time and the scan cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10953509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic validity of abbreviated breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a comparative study to the full breast MRI protocol using BI-RADS.\",\"authors\":\"Noha Yahia Ebaid, Mostafa Mohamad Assy, Ahmed M Alaa Eldin\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjr.2024.135474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This work aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast abbreviated protocol (AP) in diagnosing malignant breast lesions using BI-RADS compared with the diagnostic accuracy of the full diagnostic protocol (FDP).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective single-centre study was conducted. A total of 125 female patients with suspicious breast masses underwent MRI with the AP and the FDP. The images of AP and FDP were independently interpreted by 2 radiologists with 10 years of experience in breast imaging, and any disagreement was resolved with a third one. Using the histopathological examination as a reference test, the diagnostic effectiveness of both FDP and AP in breast cancer screening was calculated. ROC curve was utilised to estimate the optimal BI-RADS cut-off for prediction of malignancy. The difference in image interpretation time between both protocols was estimated using the Mann-Whitney test. Moreover, the inter-test agreement between both protocols was assessed using Cohen's κ test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 83 malignant and 42 benign lesions. AP indicated a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 90.5%, 96.4%, and 94.4%, while the FDP showed a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 92.9%, 100%, and 97.6%, respectively. BI-RADS 3 category was the best cut-off for prediction of malignancy. There was a significant difference between both protocols concerning the interpretation time (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was excellent agreement between both protocols, with a κ of 0.915.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Breast MRI AP may be employed instead of FDP to identify breast cancer with similar diagnostic performance. Moreover, it reduces the interpretation time and the scan cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish journal of radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10953509/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish journal of radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2024.135474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2024.135474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在确定磁共振成像(MRI)乳腺简略方案(AP)在使用 BI-RADS 诊断乳腺恶性病变方面的诊断性能,并与完整诊断方案(FDP)的诊断准确性进行比较:进行了一项前瞻性单中心研究。共有 125 名患有可疑乳腺肿块的女性患者接受了 AP 和 FDP MRI 检查。AP和FDP图像由两名在乳腺成像领域有10年经验的放射科医生独立解读,如有分歧,则由第三名医生解决。以组织病理学检查为参考,计算了 FDP 和 AP 在乳腺癌筛查中的诊断效果。利用 ROC 曲线估算出预测恶性程度的最佳 BI-RADS 临界值。使用 Mann-Whitney 检验估计了两种方案在图像解读时间上的差异。此外,还使用 Cohen's κ 检验评估了两种方案之间的检验一致性:研究包括 83 个恶性病变和 42 个良性病变。AP的特异性、敏感性和准确性分别为90.5%、96.4%和94.4%,而FDP的特异性、敏感性和准确性分别为92.9%、100%和97.6%。BI-RADS 3 类是预测恶性肿瘤的最佳临界值。两种方案在判读时间上有明显差异(P < 0.001)。两种方案之间的一致性非常好,κ为0.915:乳腺磁共振成像 AP 可代替 FDP 来识别乳腺癌,诊断效果相似。此外,它还能减少判读时间和扫描成本。
Diagnostic validity of abbreviated breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a comparative study to the full breast MRI protocol using BI-RADS.
Purpose: This work aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast abbreviated protocol (AP) in diagnosing malignant breast lesions using BI-RADS compared with the diagnostic accuracy of the full diagnostic protocol (FDP).
Material and methods: A prospective single-centre study was conducted. A total of 125 female patients with suspicious breast masses underwent MRI with the AP and the FDP. The images of AP and FDP were independently interpreted by 2 radiologists with 10 years of experience in breast imaging, and any disagreement was resolved with a third one. Using the histopathological examination as a reference test, the diagnostic effectiveness of both FDP and AP in breast cancer screening was calculated. ROC curve was utilised to estimate the optimal BI-RADS cut-off for prediction of malignancy. The difference in image interpretation time between both protocols was estimated using the Mann-Whitney test. Moreover, the inter-test agreement between both protocols was assessed using Cohen's κ test.
Results: The study included 83 malignant and 42 benign lesions. AP indicated a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 90.5%, 96.4%, and 94.4%, while the FDP showed a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 92.9%, 100%, and 97.6%, respectively. BI-RADS 3 category was the best cut-off for prediction of malignancy. There was a significant difference between both protocols concerning the interpretation time (p < 0.001). There was excellent agreement between both protocols, with a κ of 0.915.
Conclusions: Breast MRI AP may be employed instead of FDP to identify breast cancer with similar diagnostic performance. Moreover, it reduces the interpretation time and the scan cost.