人工智能鉴定大肠息肉:前瞻性多中心研究

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-03-18 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2261-2711
Glenn De Lange, Victor Prouvost, Gabriel Rahmi, Geoffroy Vanbiervliet, Catherine Le Berre, Sahar Mack, Thibaud Koessler, Emmanuel Coron
{"title":"人工智能鉴定大肠息肉:前瞻性多中心研究","authors":"Glenn De Lange, Victor Prouvost, Gabriel Rahmi, Geoffroy Vanbiervliet, Catherine Le Berre, Sahar Mack, Thibaud Koessler, Emmanuel Coron","doi":"10.1055/a-2261-2711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Optical diagnosis poses challenges to implementation of \"resect and discard\" strategies. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and performance of a new commercially available system for colorectal polyps. <b>Patients and methods</b> Nine expert endoscopists in three centers performed colonoscopies using artificial intelligence-equipped colonoscopes (CAD EYE, Fujifilm). Histology and predictions were compared, with hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated lesions grouped for analysis. <b>Results</b> Overall, 253 polyps in 119 patients were documented (n=152 adenomas, n=78 hyperplastic polyps, n=23 sessile serrated lesions). CAD EYE detected polyps before endoscopists in 81 of 253 cases (32%). The mean polyp size was 5.5 mm (SD 0.6 mm). Polyp morphology was Paris Ip (4 %), Is (28 %), IIa (60 %), and IIb (8 %). CAD EYE achieved a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 83%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 96%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 72%. Expert endoscopists had a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 83%, PPV of 96%, and NPV of 72%. Diagnostic accuracy was similar between CAD EYE (81%) and endoscopists (86%). However, sensitivity was greater with endoscopists as compared with CAD EYE ( <i>P</i> <0.05). CAD EYE classified sessile serrated lesions as hyperplasia in 22 of 23 cases, and endoscopists correctly classified 16 of 23 cases. <b>Conclusions</b> The CAD EYE system shows promise for detecting and characterizing colorectal polyps. Larger studies are needed, however, to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 3","pages":"E413-E418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10948273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence for characterization of colorectal polyps: Prospective multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Glenn De Lange, Victor Prouvost, Gabriel Rahmi, Geoffroy Vanbiervliet, Catherine Le Berre, Sahar Mack, Thibaud Koessler, Emmanuel Coron\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2261-2711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Optical diagnosis poses challenges to implementation of \\\"resect and discard\\\" strategies. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and performance of a new commercially available system for colorectal polyps. <b>Patients and methods</b> Nine expert endoscopists in three centers performed colonoscopies using artificial intelligence-equipped colonoscopes (CAD EYE, Fujifilm). Histology and predictions were compared, with hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated lesions grouped for analysis. <b>Results</b> Overall, 253 polyps in 119 patients were documented (n=152 adenomas, n=78 hyperplastic polyps, n=23 sessile serrated lesions). CAD EYE detected polyps before endoscopists in 81 of 253 cases (32%). The mean polyp size was 5.5 mm (SD 0.6 mm). Polyp morphology was Paris Ip (4 %), Is (28 %), IIa (60 %), and IIb (8 %). CAD EYE achieved a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 83%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 96%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 72%. Expert endoscopists had a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 83%, PPV of 96%, and NPV of 72%. Diagnostic accuracy was similar between CAD EYE (81%) and endoscopists (86%). However, sensitivity was greater with endoscopists as compared with CAD EYE ( <i>P</i> <0.05). CAD EYE classified sessile serrated lesions as hyperplasia in 22 of 23 cases, and endoscopists correctly classified 16 of 23 cases. <b>Conclusions</b> The CAD EYE system shows promise for detecting and characterizing colorectal polyps. Larger studies are needed, however, to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"E413-E418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10948273/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2261-2711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2261-2711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的 光学诊断为实施 "切除和抛弃 "策略带来了挑战。本研究旨在评估一种新型商业化结肠直肠息肉诊断系统的可行性和性能。患者和方法 三个中心的九名内镜专家使用配备人工智能的结肠镜(CAD EYE,富士胶片)进行结肠镜检查。对组织学和预测结果进行比较,并将增生性息肉和无柄锯齿状病变分组进行分析。结果 共记录了 119 名患者的 253 个息肉(152 个腺瘤,78 个增生性息肉,23 个无柄锯齿状病变)。在 253 个病例中,CAD EYE 比内镜医师先发现 81 个息肉(32%)。息肉的平均大小为 5.5 毫米(SD 0.6 毫米)。息肉形态为巴黎 Ip(4%)、Is(28%)、IIa(60%)和 IIb(8%)。CAD EYE 的灵敏度为 80%,特异性为 83%,阳性预测值 (PPV) 为 96%,阴性预测值 (NPV) 为 72%。内镜专家的敏感性为 88%,特异性为 83%,PPV 为 96%,NPV 为 72%。CAD EYE(81%)和内窥镜专家(86%)的诊断准确率相似。然而,与 CAD EYE 相比,内镜医师的灵敏度更高(P 结论 CAD EYE 系统有望检测出结直肠息肉并对其进行定性。不过,还需要更大规模的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial intelligence for characterization of colorectal polyps: Prospective multicenter study.

Background and study aims Optical diagnosis poses challenges to implementation of "resect and discard" strategies. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and performance of a new commercially available system for colorectal polyps. Patients and methods Nine expert endoscopists in three centers performed colonoscopies using artificial intelligence-equipped colonoscopes (CAD EYE, Fujifilm). Histology and predictions were compared, with hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated lesions grouped for analysis. Results Overall, 253 polyps in 119 patients were documented (n=152 adenomas, n=78 hyperplastic polyps, n=23 sessile serrated lesions). CAD EYE detected polyps before endoscopists in 81 of 253 cases (32%). The mean polyp size was 5.5 mm (SD 0.6 mm). Polyp morphology was Paris Ip (4 %), Is (28 %), IIa (60 %), and IIb (8 %). CAD EYE achieved a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 83%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 96%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 72%. Expert endoscopists had a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 83%, PPV of 96%, and NPV of 72%. Diagnostic accuracy was similar between CAD EYE (81%) and endoscopists (86%). However, sensitivity was greater with endoscopists as compared with CAD EYE ( P <0.05). CAD EYE classified sessile serrated lesions as hyperplasia in 22 of 23 cases, and endoscopists correctly classified 16 of 23 cases. Conclusions The CAD EYE system shows promise for detecting and characterizing colorectal polyps. Larger studies are needed, however, to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
New cholangiopancreatoscopy-assisted diagnosis of disconnected pancreatic cuct syndrome and bridging disconnected pancreatic duct. Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor. Complete extraction of main pancreatic duct residual and microstones using an 8-wire basket catheter. Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation. Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1