评估因 "Covid-19 "住院者的运动能力:出院后 30 天和 12 个月的比较

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.100615
Ana Carolina Vaz dos Santos , Daiane Roberta Viana , Lívia Maria Petilli Zopelari , Marielle Cristina Luciano , Maria Gabriela Colucci , Valéria Amorim Pires Di Lorenzo
{"title":"评估因 \"Covid-19 \"住院者的运动能力:出院后 30 天和 12 个月的比较","authors":"Ana Carolina Vaz dos Santos ,&nbsp;Daiane Roberta Viana ,&nbsp;Lívia Maria Petilli Zopelari ,&nbsp;Marielle Cristina Luciano ,&nbsp;Maria Gabriela Colucci ,&nbsp;Valéria Amorim Pires Di Lorenzo","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.100615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The 6-Minute Step Test (6MST) has been used to evaluate exercise capacity and physiological responses during the test in different populations, to assess physical performance for the activity of stepping up and down a step, as well as check for possible symptoms that the individual may present during the test. The use of 6MST to evaluate the exercise capacity of individuals who were hospitalized for COVID-19 can identify the persistence of symptoms and exercise intolerance.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare the exercise capacity and physiological responses of individuals hospitalized for COVID-19 using the 6MST, at 30 days and 12 months after hospital discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A longitudinal study was conducted with individuals hospitalized for COVID-19 and evaluated at two-time points: 30 days after hospital discharge and 12 months after hospital discharge. The 6MST was applied with monitoring of vital signs (blood pressure - BP, heart rate - HR, and peripheral oxygen saturation - SpO2) and recording of perceived pain/fatigue in the lower limbs and respiratory fatigue. At the end of the test, the number of steps executed was recorded to establish the individual's exercise capacity and to identify the percentage of the number of steps achieved according to predicted values for sex, age, height, and weight.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-three individuals were evaluated, and a significant difference was found in the 6MST performance (p≤0.05), with a higher number of steps recorded in the evaluation after 12 months of hospital discharge in 82.6% of individuals. Regarding vital signs, there was a statistically significant difference (p≤0.05) in SpO2 at the peak of the 6MST, with better saturation in the evaluation performed after 12 months of hospital discharge. There was a moderate positive correlation (R=0.420, p≤0.046) between a worse 6MST performance (evaluated by the number of steps) in individuals who required intensive care. There was no statistically significant difference (p≤0.05) in HR and SpO2 at the peak of the test and in the first minute of recovery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The exercise capacity verified by the 6MST performance in individuals who were hospitalized and received intensive care due to COVID-19 is significantly lower in the first days after hospital discharge, compared to a period of 12 months after discharge. The 6MST performance was better after 12 months of hospital discharge, indicating improvement in exercise tolerance in 82.6% of individuals. The mean SpO2 measured at the peak of the 6MST was lower in the evaluation at 30 days compared to the assessment at 12 months after hospital discharge. It may be related to lower exercise capacity in individuals affected by COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>It is necessary to monitor these individuals affected by COVID-19, and when indicated, they should be included in a pulmonary rehabilitation program with individualized physical training prescription, promoting improvement in exercise capacity and reduction of persistent symptoms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100615"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ASSESSMENT OF EXERCISE CAPACITY IN INDIVIDUALS HOSPITALIZED FOR COVID-19: COMPARISON BETWEEN 30 DAYS AND 12 MONTHS AFTER HOSPITAL DISCHARGE\",\"authors\":\"Ana Carolina Vaz dos Santos ,&nbsp;Daiane Roberta Viana ,&nbsp;Lívia Maria Petilli Zopelari ,&nbsp;Marielle Cristina Luciano ,&nbsp;Maria Gabriela Colucci ,&nbsp;Valéria Amorim Pires Di Lorenzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.100615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The 6-Minute Step Test (6MST) has been used to evaluate exercise capacity and physiological responses during the test in different populations, to assess physical performance for the activity of stepping up and down a step, as well as check for possible symptoms that the individual may present during the test. The use of 6MST to evaluate the exercise capacity of individuals who were hospitalized for COVID-19 can identify the persistence of symptoms and exercise intolerance.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare the exercise capacity and physiological responses of individuals hospitalized for COVID-19 using the 6MST, at 30 days and 12 months after hospital discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A longitudinal study was conducted with individuals hospitalized for COVID-19 and evaluated at two-time points: 30 days after hospital discharge and 12 months after hospital discharge. The 6MST was applied with monitoring of vital signs (blood pressure - BP, heart rate - HR, and peripheral oxygen saturation - SpO2) and recording of perceived pain/fatigue in the lower limbs and respiratory fatigue. At the end of the test, the number of steps executed was recorded to establish the individual's exercise capacity and to identify the percentage of the number of steps achieved according to predicted values for sex, age, height, and weight.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-three individuals were evaluated, and a significant difference was found in the 6MST performance (p≤0.05), with a higher number of steps recorded in the evaluation after 12 months of hospital discharge in 82.6% of individuals. Regarding vital signs, there was a statistically significant difference (p≤0.05) in SpO2 at the peak of the 6MST, with better saturation in the evaluation performed after 12 months of hospital discharge. There was a moderate positive correlation (R=0.420, p≤0.046) between a worse 6MST performance (evaluated by the number of steps) in individuals who required intensive care. There was no statistically significant difference (p≤0.05) in HR and SpO2 at the peak of the test and in the first minute of recovery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The exercise capacity verified by the 6MST performance in individuals who were hospitalized and received intensive care due to COVID-19 is significantly lower in the first days after hospital discharge, compared to a period of 12 months after discharge. The 6MST performance was better after 12 months of hospital discharge, indicating improvement in exercise tolerance in 82.6% of individuals. The mean SpO2 measured at the peak of the 6MST was lower in the evaluation at 30 days compared to the assessment at 12 months after hospital discharge. It may be related to lower exercise capacity in individuals affected by COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>It is necessary to monitor these individuals affected by COVID-19, and when indicated, they should be included in a pulmonary rehabilitation program with individualized physical training prescription, promoting improvement in exercise capacity and reduction of persistent symptoms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524000261\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524000261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景6分钟台阶试验(6MST)已被用于评估不同人群的运动能力和试验期间的生理反应,以评估上下台阶活动的体能表现,并检查个人在试验期间可能出现的症状。使用 6MST 评估因 COVID-19 而住院的患者的运动能力,可以识别症状的持续性和运动不耐受性。方法 对因 COVID-19 而住院的患者进行纵向研究,并在两个时间点进行评估:对 COVID-19 患者进行了纵向研究,并在出院后 30 天和出院后 12 个月这两个时间点进行了评估。在进行 6MST 测试的同时监测生命体征(血压、心率和外周血氧饱和度),并记录下肢疼痛/疲劳感和呼吸疲劳感。在测试结束时,记录所完成的步数,以确定个人的运动能力,并根据性别、年龄、身高和体重的预测值确定所完成步数的百分比。结果有 23 人接受了评估,发现 6MST 的表现存在显著差异(P≤0.05),82.6% 的人在出院 12 个月后的评估中记录的步数更高。在生命体征方面,6MST 峰值时的 SpO2 有显著统计学差异(p≤0.05),出院 12 个月后进行的评估中饱和度更高。需要重症监护的患者的 6MST 表现(以步数评估)较差,两者之间存在中度正相关(R=0.420,p≤0.046)。结论与出院后 12 个月相比,因 COVID-19 住院并接受重症监护的患者出院后最初几天的 6MST 运动能力明显较低。出院 12 个月后的 6MST 表现更好,表明 82.6% 的患者的运动耐量有所改善。与出院后 12 个月的评估结果相比,在出院 30 天的评估中,6MST 峰值时测得的平均 SpO2 值较低。这可能与受 COVID-19 影响的患者运动能力较低有关。暗示有必要对这些受 COVID-19 影响的患者进行监测,如有必要,应将其纳入肺康复计划,并为其开具个性化的体能训练处方,以促进运动能力的提高和持续症状的减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ASSESSMENT OF EXERCISE CAPACITY IN INDIVIDUALS HOSPITALIZED FOR COVID-19: COMPARISON BETWEEN 30 DAYS AND 12 MONTHS AFTER HOSPITAL DISCHARGE

Background

The 6-Minute Step Test (6MST) has been used to evaluate exercise capacity and physiological responses during the test in different populations, to assess physical performance for the activity of stepping up and down a step, as well as check for possible symptoms that the individual may present during the test. The use of 6MST to evaluate the exercise capacity of individuals who were hospitalized for COVID-19 can identify the persistence of symptoms and exercise intolerance.

Objectives

To compare the exercise capacity and physiological responses of individuals hospitalized for COVID-19 using the 6MST, at 30 days and 12 months after hospital discharge.

Methods

A longitudinal study was conducted with individuals hospitalized for COVID-19 and evaluated at two-time points: 30 days after hospital discharge and 12 months after hospital discharge. The 6MST was applied with monitoring of vital signs (blood pressure - BP, heart rate - HR, and peripheral oxygen saturation - SpO2) and recording of perceived pain/fatigue in the lower limbs and respiratory fatigue. At the end of the test, the number of steps executed was recorded to establish the individual's exercise capacity and to identify the percentage of the number of steps achieved according to predicted values for sex, age, height, and weight.

Results

Twenty-three individuals were evaluated, and a significant difference was found in the 6MST performance (p≤0.05), with a higher number of steps recorded in the evaluation after 12 months of hospital discharge in 82.6% of individuals. Regarding vital signs, there was a statistically significant difference (p≤0.05) in SpO2 at the peak of the 6MST, with better saturation in the evaluation performed after 12 months of hospital discharge. There was a moderate positive correlation (R=0.420, p≤0.046) between a worse 6MST performance (evaluated by the number of steps) in individuals who required intensive care. There was no statistically significant difference (p≤0.05) in HR and SpO2 at the peak of the test and in the first minute of recovery.

Conclusion

The exercise capacity verified by the 6MST performance in individuals who were hospitalized and received intensive care due to COVID-19 is significantly lower in the first days after hospital discharge, compared to a period of 12 months after discharge. The 6MST performance was better after 12 months of hospital discharge, indicating improvement in exercise tolerance in 82.6% of individuals. The mean SpO2 measured at the peak of the 6MST was lower in the evaluation at 30 days compared to the assessment at 12 months after hospital discharge. It may be related to lower exercise capacity in individuals affected by COVID-19.

Implications

It is necessary to monitor these individuals affected by COVID-19, and when indicated, they should be included in a pulmonary rehabilitation program with individualized physical training prescription, promoting improvement in exercise capacity and reduction of persistent symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.
期刊最新文献
Psychological, disability, and somatosensory characteristics across different risk levels in individuals with low back pain: A cross-sectional study The experiences of physical therapists delivering a very low energy diet and exercise intervention for weight loss in people with knee osteoarthritis: A qualitative study “If by exercising I can conceive; I would like to exercise”. Exploring knowledge, perception, and practices about exercise among women with infertility: A qualitative study A Brazilian Association of Women´s Health Physical Therapy (ABRAFISM) guideline on the terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and assessment Reply to letter to editor for article: ‘‘Development, reliability, and validity of the mobility assessment scale in hospitalized patients (HMob).’’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1