急性背痛 - 注射技术和手术的作用:WFNS 脊柱委员会建议

Q1 Medicine World Neurosurgery: X Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100315
Nikolay Peev , Corinna Zygourakis , Christoph Sippl , G. Grasso , Joachim Oertel , Salman Sharif
{"title":"急性背痛 - 注射技术和手术的作用:WFNS 脊柱委员会建议","authors":"Nikolay Peev ,&nbsp;Corinna Zygourakis ,&nbsp;Christoph Sippl ,&nbsp;G. Grasso ,&nbsp;Joachim Oertel ,&nbsp;Salman Sharif","doi":"10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Lower back pain is a significant cause of morbidity, and despite a range of interventions available, there is a lack of consensus on the most efficacious treatments. The aim of this systematic review is to formulate a list of recommendations for the role of spinal injections and surgery in the treatment of acute back pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature search from 2012 to 2022 was conducted on Pubmed, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for papers focusing on the role of injections and surgery for the management of acute lower back pain. Inclusion criteria included randomised controlled trials, as well as prospective and retrospective studies reporting primary outcomes (pain improvement (VAS score) and back-specific functional status) and secondary outcomes (post-procedure complications). These data were reviewed, presented, and voted on by an expert panel consisting of 14 attending spine surgeons from 14 countries at the consensus meeting of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine Committee. A two-round consensus-based Delphi method was used to generate consensus, and topics with &gt;66% agreement were categorized as having reached consensus.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>100 studies met inclusion criteria. Of these, 20 were selected by the committee for full text review and presented at the consensus meeting. The committee voted on 8 statements and achieved consensus on the following 7 statements: (1) Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) show significant benefit to discogenic back pain; (2) A lateral approach is superior to a midline approach for ESIs; (3) Short-term (&lt;1 week) effect of ESIs is similar between steroids; (4) ESIs have a variety of potential complications; (5) CT or fluoroscopy guidance can be used for lumbar medial branch blocks; (6) Lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablations can be performed on patients with recurrent pain after a successful ESI, and (7) Acute lower back pain is usually self-limiting, resolves in &lt;6 weeks, and does not require surgical intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Given significant treatment heterogeneity, we provide the latest, evidence-based recommendations for management of acute lower back pain. ESIs are effective at short-term pain relief, and surgical intervention should be reserved for patients failing conservative measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37134,"journal":{"name":"World Neurosurgery: X","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724000462/pdfft?md5=4fe584a882a09407590ba544a6938afa&pid=1-s2.0-S2590139724000462-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute back pain – Role of injection techniques and surgery: WFNS spine committee recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Nikolay Peev ,&nbsp;Corinna Zygourakis ,&nbsp;Christoph Sippl ,&nbsp;G. Grasso ,&nbsp;Joachim Oertel ,&nbsp;Salman Sharif\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Lower back pain is a significant cause of morbidity, and despite a range of interventions available, there is a lack of consensus on the most efficacious treatments. The aim of this systematic review is to formulate a list of recommendations for the role of spinal injections and surgery in the treatment of acute back pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature search from 2012 to 2022 was conducted on Pubmed, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for papers focusing on the role of injections and surgery for the management of acute lower back pain. Inclusion criteria included randomised controlled trials, as well as prospective and retrospective studies reporting primary outcomes (pain improvement (VAS score) and back-specific functional status) and secondary outcomes (post-procedure complications). These data were reviewed, presented, and voted on by an expert panel consisting of 14 attending spine surgeons from 14 countries at the consensus meeting of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine Committee. A two-round consensus-based Delphi method was used to generate consensus, and topics with &gt;66% agreement were categorized as having reached consensus.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>100 studies met inclusion criteria. Of these, 20 were selected by the committee for full text review and presented at the consensus meeting. The committee voted on 8 statements and achieved consensus on the following 7 statements: (1) Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) show significant benefit to discogenic back pain; (2) A lateral approach is superior to a midline approach for ESIs; (3) Short-term (&lt;1 week) effect of ESIs is similar between steroids; (4) ESIs have a variety of potential complications; (5) CT or fluoroscopy guidance can be used for lumbar medial branch blocks; (6) Lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablations can be performed on patients with recurrent pain after a successful ESI, and (7) Acute lower back pain is usually self-limiting, resolves in &lt;6 weeks, and does not require surgical intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Given significant treatment heterogeneity, we provide the latest, evidence-based recommendations for management of acute lower back pain. ESIs are effective at short-term pain relief, and surgical intervention should be reserved for patients failing conservative measures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Neurosurgery: X\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724000462/pdfft?md5=4fe584a882a09407590ba544a6938afa&pid=1-s2.0-S2590139724000462-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Neurosurgery: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724000462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Neurosurgery: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724000462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 下背痛是发病的一个重要原因,尽管存在一系列干预措施,但人们对最有效的治疗方法缺乏共识。方法 在 Pubmed、Medline 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 上对 2012 年至 2022 年的文献进行了系统性检索,重点检索有关注射和手术治疗急性下背痛作用的论文。纳入标准包括随机对照试验,以及报告主要结果(疼痛改善(VAS 评分)和背部特异性功能状态)和次要结果(术后并发症)的前瞻性和回顾性研究。在世界神经外科学会联合会(WFNS)脊柱委员会的共识会议上,由来自 14 个国家的 14 位脊柱外科医生组成的专家小组对这些数据进行了审查、展示和投票。为了达成共识,专家组采用了两轮基于共识的德尔菲法,并将达成 66% 一致意见的主题归类为已达成共识。其中,委员会选择了 20 项研究进行全文审阅,并在共识会议上进行了介绍。委员会就 8 项声明进行了投票,并就以下 7 项声明达成了共识:(1) 硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)对椎间盘源性背痛有显著疗效;(2) 外侧入路优于中线入路;(3) 类固醇注射的短期(<1 周)疗效相似;(4) ESI 有多种潜在并发症;(5)腰椎内侧支阻滞可使用 CT 或透视引导;(6)ESI 成功后,可对疼痛反复发作的患者进行腰椎内侧支射频消融术;(7)急性下背痛通常具有自限性,可在 6 周内缓解,且无需手术干预。结论鉴于治疗方法的显著异质性,我们为急性下背痛的治疗提供了最新的循证建议。ESI能有效缓解短期疼痛,手术干预应保留给保守治疗无效的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acute back pain – Role of injection techniques and surgery: WFNS spine committee recommendations

Objective

Lower back pain is a significant cause of morbidity, and despite a range of interventions available, there is a lack of consensus on the most efficacious treatments. The aim of this systematic review is to formulate a list of recommendations for the role of spinal injections and surgery in the treatment of acute back pain.

Methods

A systematic literature search from 2012 to 2022 was conducted on Pubmed, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for papers focusing on the role of injections and surgery for the management of acute lower back pain. Inclusion criteria included randomised controlled trials, as well as prospective and retrospective studies reporting primary outcomes (pain improvement (VAS score) and back-specific functional status) and secondary outcomes (post-procedure complications). These data were reviewed, presented, and voted on by an expert panel consisting of 14 attending spine surgeons from 14 countries at the consensus meeting of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine Committee. A two-round consensus-based Delphi method was used to generate consensus, and topics with >66% agreement were categorized as having reached consensus.

Results

100 studies met inclusion criteria. Of these, 20 were selected by the committee for full text review and presented at the consensus meeting. The committee voted on 8 statements and achieved consensus on the following 7 statements: (1) Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) show significant benefit to discogenic back pain; (2) A lateral approach is superior to a midline approach for ESIs; (3) Short-term (<1 week) effect of ESIs is similar between steroids; (4) ESIs have a variety of potential complications; (5) CT or fluoroscopy guidance can be used for lumbar medial branch blocks; (6) Lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablations can be performed on patients with recurrent pain after a successful ESI, and (7) Acute lower back pain is usually self-limiting, resolves in <6 weeks, and does not require surgical intervention.

Conclusion

Given significant treatment heterogeneity, we provide the latest, evidence-based recommendations for management of acute lower back pain. ESIs are effective at short-term pain relief, and surgical intervention should be reserved for patients failing conservative measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Neurosurgery: X
World Neurosurgery: X Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
44 days
期刊最新文献
Comparative utility analysis of Chordoma search information between ChatGPT vs. Google Web Letter to the Editor regarding "Using the modified frailty index as a predictor of complications in adults undergoing transforaminal interbody lumbar fusion" Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for patients with 16 or more brain metastases: Retrospective single-institution analysis Trends in stroke-related mortality in California hospitals from 2010 to 2020: Have the large core stroke trials made a difference? Impact of body mass index on perioperative complications, radiographic outcomes, and pseudoarthrosis at one year after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1