大流行期间公立儿童和青少年精神病科的心理远程保健:定性实施研究。

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medwave Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.5867/medwave.2024.02.2777
Francisca García, Melannie Klagges, Fanny Leyton, Ingrid Nogales, Carolina Mickman, Claudio Martínez, Alemka Tomicic
{"title":"大流行期间公立儿童和青少年精神病科的心理远程保健:定性实施研究。","authors":"Francisca García, Melannie Klagges, Fanny Leyton, Ingrid Nogales, Carolina Mickman, Claudio Martínez, Alemka Tomicic","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2024.02.2777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic led to a prompt implementation of remote care, especially in mental health care. The evidence supporting this modality of care is still emerging, with few qualitative studies describing its implementation in Latin American countries. This study aims to understand the perspectives of therapists and patients regarding the use of telehealth in a child and adolescent mental health unit of a Chilean public service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a qualitative study. Two focus groups were defined with 14 professionals, and 16 in-depth interviews were conducted with users of an outpatient child and adolescent psychiatry unit. The data were analyzed using the grounded theory model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the group of therapists, four main categories emerged: background of mental telehealth, implementation, mental telehealth from the therapist's position, and projections. Three main categories emerged in the patient's group: implementation, evaluation of mental telehealth users, and projections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are elements in common between the opinions of patients and therapists. Something to note within the patient's group is that, despite accepting remote care and recognizing its positive aspects, aside from the pandemic context, they prefer face-to-face or mixed care.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental telehealth in a public child and adolescent psychiatry unit during the pandemic: a qualitative implementation study.\",\"authors\":\"Francisca García, Melannie Klagges, Fanny Leyton, Ingrid Nogales, Carolina Mickman, Claudio Martínez, Alemka Tomicic\",\"doi\":\"10.5867/medwave.2024.02.2777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic led to a prompt implementation of remote care, especially in mental health care. The evidence supporting this modality of care is still emerging, with few qualitative studies describing its implementation in Latin American countries. This study aims to understand the perspectives of therapists and patients regarding the use of telehealth in a child and adolescent mental health unit of a Chilean public service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a qualitative study. Two focus groups were defined with 14 professionals, and 16 in-depth interviews were conducted with users of an outpatient child and adolescent psychiatry unit. The data were analyzed using the grounded theory model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the group of therapists, four main categories emerged: background of mental telehealth, implementation, mental telehealth from the therapist's position, and projections. Three main categories emerged in the patient's group: implementation, evaluation of mental telehealth users, and projections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are elements in common between the opinions of patients and therapists. Something to note within the patient's group is that, despite accepting remote care and recognizing its positive aspects, aside from the pandemic context, they prefer face-to-face or mixed care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medwave\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medwave\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2024.02.2777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medwave","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2024.02.2777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:COVID-19 大流行导致远程医疗的迅速实施,尤其是在精神医疗方面。支持这种护理方式的证据仍在不断涌现,很少有定性研究描述其在拉丁美洲国家的实施情况。本研究旨在了解治疗师和患者对远程医疗在智利公共服务机构儿童和青少年心理健康部门的使用情况的看法:这是一项定性研究。对 14 名专业人员进行了两次焦点小组讨论,对儿童和青少年精神科门诊部的用户进行了 16 次深入访谈。研究采用基础理论模式对数据进行了分析:在治疗师群体中,出现了四个主要类别:心理远程保健的背景、实施情况、从治疗师的立场看心理远程保健以及预测。患者组中出现了三个主要类别:实施、对心理远程保健用户的评价和预测:患者和治疗师的观点有一些共同点。值得注意的是,在患者群体中,尽管他们接受远程医疗并承认其积极的一面,但除了大流行病的情况外,他们更倾向于面对面或混合式医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mental telehealth in a public child and adolescent psychiatry unit during the pandemic: a qualitative implementation study.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a prompt implementation of remote care, especially in mental health care. The evidence supporting this modality of care is still emerging, with few qualitative studies describing its implementation in Latin American countries. This study aims to understand the perspectives of therapists and patients regarding the use of telehealth in a child and adolescent mental health unit of a Chilean public service.

Methods: This is a qualitative study. Two focus groups were defined with 14 professionals, and 16 in-depth interviews were conducted with users of an outpatient child and adolescent psychiatry unit. The data were analyzed using the grounded theory model.

Results: In the group of therapists, four main categories emerged: background of mental telehealth, implementation, mental telehealth from the therapist's position, and projections. Three main categories emerged in the patient's group: implementation, evaluation of mental telehealth users, and projections.

Conclusions: There are elements in common between the opinions of patients and therapists. Something to note within the patient's group is that, despite accepting remote care and recognizing its positive aspects, aside from the pandemic context, they prefer face-to-face or mixed care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medwave
Medwave MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medwave is a peer-reviewed, biomedical and public health journal. Since its foundation in 2001 (Volume 1) it has always been an online only, open access publication that does not charge subscription or reader fees. Since January 2011 (Volume 11, Number 1), all articles are peer-reviewed. Without losing sight of the importance of evidence-based approach and methodological soundness, the journal accepts for publication articles that focus on providing updates for clinical practice, review and analysis articles on topics such as ethics, public health and health policy; clinical, social and economic health determinants; clinical and health research findings from all of the major disciplines of medicine, medical science and public health. The journal does not publish basic science manuscripts or experiments conducted on animals. Until March 2013, Medwave was publishing 11-12 numbers a year. Each issue would be posted on the homepage on day 1 of each month, except for Chile’s summer holiday when the issue would cover two months. Starting from April 2013, Medwave adopted the continuous mode of publication, which means that the copyedited accepted articles are posted on the journal’s homepage as they are ready. They are then collated in the respective issue and included in the Past Issues section.
期刊最新文献
Translation and cultural adaptation of the Long Coronavirus Disease (COVID) Symptom and Impact Tools for the Chilean population. Forensic and legal medicine in Chile: Cinderella without a prince. Preventive behaviors for COVID-19 in Chile: Lessons from a population follow-up for 2021 and 2022. Correction to: Daily compliance of the ABCDEF liberation bundle for patients in the intensive care unit: A retrospective descriptive study. Obesogenicity perception of food environments in adults: A cross-sectional study in urban areas of Santiago, Chile.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1