择期手术患者术前注射布比卡因与术后注射布比卡因的术后平均疼痛评分比较

International journal of pharmacy and pharmaceutical research Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-30
Muhammad Bilal Akbar, Babar Hameed
{"title":"择期手术患者术前注射布比卡因与术后注射布比卡因的术后平均疼痛评分比较","authors":"Muhammad Bilal Akbar, Babar Hameed","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The most important concern after the surgical intervention is pain which needs to be addressed for better compliance and early mobilization to avoid other complications. The need for a better analgesic and time of administration is the key to success.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the mean post-operative pain score with pre-incisional versus post-operative injection of bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This Randomized controlled trial was conducted in the General surgery department, National Hospital & Medical Centre, Lahore from 24-02-20 to 24-11-20. Data was collected through Non-probability consecutive sampling. The cases of both genders with an age range of 18-60 years undergoing elective surgeries were selected. They were divided into two groups. The cases in group A were given pre-incision bupivacaine and group B with post-operative bupivacaine and were assessed 1 hour after surgery regarding pain on VAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the present study there were a total of 64 cases with 32 in each group. The mean age in group A was 47.56±7.51 years while in group B was 49.13±8.03 years. There were 19 (59.37%) males in group A vs 18 (56.25%) in group B. The mean post-operative pain in group A was 3.07±0.67 vs 3.59±0.91 in group B on VAS with p= 0.03. Mean post-operative pain in males was 3.12±0.65 vs 3.47±0.86 and in females, it was 3.21±0.66 vs 3.53±0.90 in groups A and B with p values of 0.21 and 0.23 respectively. Mean Post-operative pain was 3.11±0.66 vs 3.44±0.83 in the age group 18-39 years and 3.08±0.68 vs 3.47±0.88 in age group 40 to 60 years in group A and B with p values of 0.25 and 0.20 respectively. There was a significant difference in terms of postoperative pain in cases undergoing open cholecystectomy where pain was 3.21±0.78 vs 3.86±1.02 in group A and B respectively with p= 0.01. Whereas no difference was seen in the rest of the variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mean post-operative pain is significantly better in cases treated with pre-incisional bupivacaine as compared to post-operative bupivacaine and this difference was also seen as significantly high in cases undergoing open cholecystectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":92533,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pharmacy and pharmaceutical research","volume":"28 1","pages":"23-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Mean Post-Operative Pain Score with Pre-Incisional Versus Postoperative Injection of Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Bilal Akbar, Babar Hameed\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The most important concern after the surgical intervention is pain which needs to be addressed for better compliance and early mobilization to avoid other complications. The need for a better analgesic and time of administration is the key to success.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the mean post-operative pain score with pre-incisional versus post-operative injection of bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This Randomized controlled trial was conducted in the General surgery department, National Hospital & Medical Centre, Lahore from 24-02-20 to 24-11-20. Data was collected through Non-probability consecutive sampling. The cases of both genders with an age range of 18-60 years undergoing elective surgeries were selected. They were divided into two groups. The cases in group A were given pre-incision bupivacaine and group B with post-operative bupivacaine and were assessed 1 hour after surgery regarding pain on VAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the present study there were a total of 64 cases with 32 in each group. The mean age in group A was 47.56±7.51 years while in group B was 49.13±8.03 years. There were 19 (59.37%) males in group A vs 18 (56.25%) in group B. The mean post-operative pain in group A was 3.07±0.67 vs 3.59±0.91 in group B on VAS with p= 0.03. Mean post-operative pain in males was 3.12±0.65 vs 3.47±0.86 and in females, it was 3.21±0.66 vs 3.53±0.90 in groups A and B with p values of 0.21 and 0.23 respectively. Mean Post-operative pain was 3.11±0.66 vs 3.44±0.83 in the age group 18-39 years and 3.08±0.68 vs 3.47±0.88 in age group 40 to 60 years in group A and B with p values of 0.25 and 0.20 respectively. There was a significant difference in terms of postoperative pain in cases undergoing open cholecystectomy where pain was 3.21±0.78 vs 3.86±1.02 in group A and B respectively with p= 0.01. Whereas no difference was seen in the rest of the variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mean post-operative pain is significantly better in cases treated with pre-incisional bupivacaine as compared to post-operative bupivacaine and this difference was also seen as significantly high in cases undergoing open cholecystectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of pharmacy and pharmaceutical research\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"23-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of pharmacy and pharmaceutical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pharmacy and pharmaceutical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术治疗后最重要的问题是疼痛,这需要得到解决,以提高患者的依从性和早期活动能力,避免其他并发症。需要更好的镇痛剂和给药时间是成功的关键:比较择期手术患者术前与术后注射布比卡因的平均术后疼痛评分:这项随机对照试验于 20 年 2 月 24 日至 20 年 11 月 24 日在拉合尔国立医院和医疗中心普外科进行。数据通过非概率连续抽样收集。选取了 18-60 岁接受择期手术的男女病例。他们被分为两组。A 组病例在手术前使用布比卡因,B 组病例在手术后使用布比卡因,并在手术后 1 小时根据 VAS 对疼痛进行评估:本研究共有 64 例病例,每组 32 例。A 组的平均年龄为(47.56±7.51)岁,B 组为(49.13±8.03)岁。A 组有 19 名男性(59.37%),B 组有 18 名男性(56.25%)。术后疼痛 VAS 平均值为 3.07±0.67,B 组为 3.59±0.91,P= 0.03。A 组和 B 组男性术后平均疼痛为 3.12±0.65 vs 3.47±0.86,女性术后平均疼痛为 3.21±0.66 vs 3.53±0.90,P 值分别为 0.21 和 0.23。A 组和 B 组 18-39 岁年龄组的平均术后疼痛为 3.11±0.66 vs 3.44±0.83,40-60 岁年龄组的平均术后疼痛为 3.08±0.68 vs 3.47±0.88,P 值分别为 0.25 和 0.20。接受开腹胆囊切除术的患者术后疼痛明显不同,A 组和 B 组分别为 3.21±0.78 对 3.86±1.02,P= 0.01。结论:A 组和 B 组的术后平均疼痛明显优于 A 组和 B 组,P= 0.01:结论:使用切口前布比卡因治疗的病例术后平均疼痛明显优于术后布比卡因治疗的病例,这种差异在开腹胆囊切除术病例中也明显较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Mean Post-Operative Pain Score with Pre-Incisional Versus Postoperative Injection of Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery.

The most important concern after the surgical intervention is pain which needs to be addressed for better compliance and early mobilization to avoid other complications. The need for a better analgesic and time of administration is the key to success.

Objective: To compare the mean post-operative pain score with pre-incisional versus post-operative injection of bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective surgery.

Study design: This Randomized controlled trial was conducted in the General surgery department, National Hospital & Medical Centre, Lahore from 24-02-20 to 24-11-20. Data was collected through Non-probability consecutive sampling. The cases of both genders with an age range of 18-60 years undergoing elective surgeries were selected. They were divided into two groups. The cases in group A were given pre-incision bupivacaine and group B with post-operative bupivacaine and were assessed 1 hour after surgery regarding pain on VAS.

Results: In the present study there were a total of 64 cases with 32 in each group. The mean age in group A was 47.56±7.51 years while in group B was 49.13±8.03 years. There were 19 (59.37%) males in group A vs 18 (56.25%) in group B. The mean post-operative pain in group A was 3.07±0.67 vs 3.59±0.91 in group B on VAS with p= 0.03. Mean post-operative pain in males was 3.12±0.65 vs 3.47±0.86 and in females, it was 3.21±0.66 vs 3.53±0.90 in groups A and B with p values of 0.21 and 0.23 respectively. Mean Post-operative pain was 3.11±0.66 vs 3.44±0.83 in the age group 18-39 years and 3.08±0.68 vs 3.47±0.88 in age group 40 to 60 years in group A and B with p values of 0.25 and 0.20 respectively. There was a significant difference in terms of postoperative pain in cases undergoing open cholecystectomy where pain was 3.21±0.78 vs 3.86±1.02 in group A and B respectively with p= 0.01. Whereas no difference was seen in the rest of the variables.

Conclusion: Mean post-operative pain is significantly better in cases treated with pre-incisional bupivacaine as compared to post-operative bupivacaine and this difference was also seen as significantly high in cases undergoing open cholecystectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Mean Post-Operative Pain Score with Pre-Incisional Versus Postoperative Injection of Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery. Effect of Menoveda Akira Tablet against Anxiety; an In-Vivo Zebra Fish Model Study Phytochemical and Pharmacological Review of Turbud (Operculina turpethum) Traditional Uses, Biological Activities and Phyto Chemical Properties of Banafsha (Viola odorata Linn): A Review A Brief Review on Alzheimer’s Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1