利用 OCTAVIUS 4D 模型测量视丘和腮腺器官的剂量:鼻咽癌治疗的动态 IMRT 方法

Laya Karimkhani , Elham Saeedzadeh , Dariush Sardari , Seied Rabi Mahdavi
{"title":"利用 OCTAVIUS 4D 模型测量视丘和腮腺器官的剂量:鼻咽癌治疗的动态 IMRT 方法","authors":"Laya Karimkhani ,&nbsp;Elham Saeedzadeh ,&nbsp;Dariush Sardari ,&nbsp;Seied Rabi Mahdavi","doi":"10.1016/j.imu.2024.101479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques, although the dose conformity increases, the out-of-field doses would not decrease. This study aimed to assess the dose error calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) in the out-of-field regions using the dynamic IMRT (D-IMRT) method in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The out-of-field doses were measured for the chiasm and parotid organs using the D-IMRT technique (6 MV energy) with Monaco TPS. Computed tomography (CT) images of 10 NPC patients (54–77 years, mean: 61.6 ± 12.2 years) were considered and countered using 7-field and 11-field methods. The OCTAVIUS 4D phantom was utilized for dose assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>According to the OCTAVIUS measurements, the Monaco TPS dose errors ranged from −58.8 to 105.5%. The average dose error for optic chiasm and parotid organs was −25% and 8.5%, respectively, with several cases falling within tolerance (±5%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There were considerable dose calculation errors by Monaco TPS for organs located in out-of-field regions (optic chiasm and parotid) during IMRT for NPC patients. Therefore, accurate dose estimation in the out-of-field regions should be considered in clinical practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13953,"journal":{"name":"Informatics in Medicine Unlocked","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 101479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352914824000352/pdfft?md5=b9aec1cd6136252ad6eb04c8bd722b45&pid=1-s2.0-S2352914824000352-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose measurement of optic chiasm and parotid organs using OCTAVIUS 4D phantom: a dynamic IMRT method for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment\",\"authors\":\"Laya Karimkhani ,&nbsp;Elham Saeedzadeh ,&nbsp;Dariush Sardari ,&nbsp;Seied Rabi Mahdavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.imu.2024.101479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques, although the dose conformity increases, the out-of-field doses would not decrease. This study aimed to assess the dose error calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) in the out-of-field regions using the dynamic IMRT (D-IMRT) method in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The out-of-field doses were measured for the chiasm and parotid organs using the D-IMRT technique (6 MV energy) with Monaco TPS. Computed tomography (CT) images of 10 NPC patients (54–77 years, mean: 61.6 ± 12.2 years) were considered and countered using 7-field and 11-field methods. The OCTAVIUS 4D phantom was utilized for dose assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>According to the OCTAVIUS measurements, the Monaco TPS dose errors ranged from −58.8 to 105.5%. The average dose error for optic chiasm and parotid organs was −25% and 8.5%, respectively, with several cases falling within tolerance (±5%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There were considerable dose calculation errors by Monaco TPS for organs located in out-of-field regions (optic chiasm and parotid) during IMRT for NPC patients. Therefore, accurate dose estimation in the out-of-field regions should be considered in clinical practices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informatics in Medicine Unlocked\",\"volume\":\"46 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352914824000352/pdfft?md5=b9aec1cd6136252ad6eb04c8bd722b45&pid=1-s2.0-S2352914824000352-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informatics in Medicine Unlocked\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352914824000352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics in Medicine Unlocked","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352914824000352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 在调强放射治疗(IMRT)技术中,虽然剂量符合性会增加,但场外剂量不会减少。本研究旨在评估治疗计划系统(TPS)在鼻咽癌患者中使用动态 IMRT(D-IMRT)方法计算出的场外区域剂量误差。采用 7 场和 11 场方法对 10 名鼻咽癌患者(54-77 岁,平均 61.6 ± 12.2 岁)的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像进行了研究和对比。结果根据 OCTAVIUS 的测量结果,摩纳哥 TPS 的剂量误差在 -58.8% 到 105.5% 之间。结论在对鼻咽癌患者进行 IMRT 时,Monaco TPS 对位于场外区域(视丘和腮腺)的器官的剂量计算存在相当大的误差。因此,在临床实践中应考虑精确估算场外区域的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dose measurement of optic chiasm and parotid organs using OCTAVIUS 4D phantom: a dynamic IMRT method for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment

Introduction

In intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques, although the dose conformity increases, the out-of-field doses would not decrease. This study aimed to assess the dose error calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) in the out-of-field regions using the dynamic IMRT (D-IMRT) method in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients.

Methods

The out-of-field doses were measured for the chiasm and parotid organs using the D-IMRT technique (6 MV energy) with Monaco TPS. Computed tomography (CT) images of 10 NPC patients (54–77 years, mean: 61.6 ± 12.2 years) were considered and countered using 7-field and 11-field methods. The OCTAVIUS 4D phantom was utilized for dose assessment.

Results

According to the OCTAVIUS measurements, the Monaco TPS dose errors ranged from −58.8 to 105.5%. The average dose error for optic chiasm and parotid organs was −25% and 8.5%, respectively, with several cases falling within tolerance (±5%).

Conclusion

There were considerable dose calculation errors by Monaco TPS for organs located in out-of-field regions (optic chiasm and parotid) during IMRT for NPC patients. Therefore, accurate dose estimation in the out-of-field regions should be considered in clinical practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
282
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Informatics in Medicine Unlocked (IMU) is an international gold open access journal covering a broad spectrum of topics within medical informatics, including (but not limited to) papers focusing on imaging, pathology, teledermatology, public health, ophthalmological, nursing and translational medicine informatics. The full papers that are published in the journal are accessible to all who visit the website.
期刊最新文献
Usability and accessibility in mHealth stroke apps: An empirical assessment Spatiotemporal chest wall movement analysis using depth sensor imaging for detecting respiratory asynchrony Regression and classification of Windkessel parameters from non-invasive cardiovascular quantities using a fully connected neural network Patient2Trial: From patient to participant in clinical trials using large language models Structural modification of Naproxen; physicochemical, spectral, medicinal, and pharmacological evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1