机构性虐待儿童中的陈规定型观念和无意识偏见:识别、报告和预防的障碍

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse Review Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1002/car.2865
Suzanne Arnold, Elizabeth L. Jeglic
{"title":"机构性虐待儿童中的陈规定型观念和无意识偏见:识别、报告和预防的障碍","authors":"Suzanne Arnold,&nbsp;Elizabeth L. Jeglic","doi":"10.1002/car.2865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Child sexual abuse within institutional settings has been a major concern for governments around the world for many years. Consequently, prevention policies have been developed, and institutional child abuse laws have been strengthened in many jurisdictions. Legislation is important to prevent reoffending, however, the majority of childhood sexual abuse remains unreported and undetected. While awareness of the failings of institutions to properly identify and respond to child abuse has grown in recent years, barriers to reporting institutional abuse remain understudied, impacting the ability to prevent abuse. One possible reason that prevents workers from identifying and reporting child sexual abuse is that their judgements are vulnerable to stereotypes and unconscious biases about who perpetrates and is victimised by sexual crimes and what constitutes warning signs of sexually abusive behaviours. Research in psychology provides key insights into human reasoning processes that can lead to bias, so workers fail to identify, respond and prevent grooming and child abuse in an organisational context. This paper reviews what is known about the development and maintenance of stereotypes and unconscious bias, their role in institutional sexual abuse, and concludes with a discussion of measures that can be taken to mitigate unconscious bias to prevent child abuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":47371,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse Review","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotypes and unconscious bias in institutional child sexual abuse: Barriers to identification, reporting and prevention\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne Arnold,&nbsp;Elizabeth L. Jeglic\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/car.2865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Child sexual abuse within institutional settings has been a major concern for governments around the world for many years. Consequently, prevention policies have been developed, and institutional child abuse laws have been strengthened in many jurisdictions. Legislation is important to prevent reoffending, however, the majority of childhood sexual abuse remains unreported and undetected. While awareness of the failings of institutions to properly identify and respond to child abuse has grown in recent years, barriers to reporting institutional abuse remain understudied, impacting the ability to prevent abuse. One possible reason that prevents workers from identifying and reporting child sexual abuse is that their judgements are vulnerable to stereotypes and unconscious biases about who perpetrates and is victimised by sexual crimes and what constitutes warning signs of sexually abusive behaviours. Research in psychology provides key insights into human reasoning processes that can lead to bias, so workers fail to identify, respond and prevent grooming and child abuse in an organisational context. This paper reviews what is known about the development and maintenance of stereotypes and unconscious bias, their role in institutional sexual abuse, and concludes with a discussion of measures that can be taken to mitigate unconscious bias to prevent child abuse.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Abuse Review\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Abuse Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/car.2865\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/car.2865","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多年来,机构环境中的儿童性虐待问题一直是世界各国政府关注的主要问题。因此,许多司法管辖区制定了预防政策,并加强了机构虐待儿童的法律。立法对于防止再次犯罪非常重要,然而,大多数儿童性虐待事件仍未被报告和发现。虽然近年来人们对机构未能正确识别和应对虐待儿童行为的认识有所提高,但对报告机构虐待行为的障碍仍然研究不足,这影响了预防虐待行为的能力。阻碍工作人员识别和报告儿童性虐待的一个可能原因是,他们的判断很容易受到陈规定型观念和无意识偏见的影响,即谁会实施性犯罪,谁会成为性犯罪的受害者,以及什么是性虐待行为的警示信号。心理学研究提供了有关人类推理过程的重要见解,这些推理过程可能会导致偏见,从而使工作人员无法在组织环境中识别、应对和预防诱拐和虐待儿童行为。本文回顾了有关陈规定型观念和无意识偏见的形成和维持及其在机构性虐待中的作用的已知知识,最后讨论了可以采取哪些措施来减轻无意识偏见以防止虐待儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stereotypes and unconscious bias in institutional child sexual abuse: Barriers to identification, reporting and prevention

Child sexual abuse within institutional settings has been a major concern for governments around the world for many years. Consequently, prevention policies have been developed, and institutional child abuse laws have been strengthened in many jurisdictions. Legislation is important to prevent reoffending, however, the majority of childhood sexual abuse remains unreported and undetected. While awareness of the failings of institutions to properly identify and respond to child abuse has grown in recent years, barriers to reporting institutional abuse remain understudied, impacting the ability to prevent abuse. One possible reason that prevents workers from identifying and reporting child sexual abuse is that their judgements are vulnerable to stereotypes and unconscious biases about who perpetrates and is victimised by sexual crimes and what constitutes warning signs of sexually abusive behaviours. Research in psychology provides key insights into human reasoning processes that can lead to bias, so workers fail to identify, respond and prevent grooming and child abuse in an organisational context. This paper reviews what is known about the development and maintenance of stereotypes and unconscious bias, their role in institutional sexual abuse, and concludes with a discussion of measures that can be taken to mitigate unconscious bias to prevent child abuse.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child Abuse Review
Child Abuse Review Multiple-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Child Abuse Review provides a forum for all professionals working in the field of child protection, giving them access to the latest research findings, practice developments, training initiatives and policy issues. The Journal"s remit includes all forms of maltreatment, whether they occur inside or outside the family environment. Papers are written in a style appropriate for a multidisciplinary audience and those from outside Britain are welcomed. The Journal maintains a practice orientated focus and authors of research papers are encouraged to examine and discuss implications for practitioners.
期刊最新文献
An analysis of child safeguarding cases managed by National Governing Bodies of sport across England and Wales The intersection of child protection and healthcare: Paediatric social admissions Proactive and reactive sibling aggression and their mediating effects on the relationship between exposure to parental violence and adulthood intimate partner violence perpetration Does money motivate prospective foster parents? Are responses from high vs. low-income towns different? Evidence from Google advertising A thematic analysis of the involvement of children and families in Child Safeguarding Practice Reviews in England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1