信息简化和默认选择可改善财务决策:信用卡账单实验。

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI:10.1016/j.socec.2024.102193
Jose M. Ortiz , Lucas I. Teixeira , Natália N.L. Falcão , Erika A. Soki , Raquel M. Almeida
{"title":"信息简化和默认选择可改善财务决策:信用卡账单实验。","authors":"Jose M. Ortiz ,&nbsp;Lucas I. Teixeira ,&nbsp;Natália N.L. Falcão ,&nbsp;Erika A. Soki ,&nbsp;Raquel M. Almeida","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We run a between-subjects experiment to test how better-organized credit card statements, written in simplified language and default choices, help people make better financial decisions. Participants were shown either a standard (control treatment), a simplified, or a simplified with anchored information statement of a credit card bill. While observing the bill, they were asked factual and decision-making questions. We find higher correct response rates and debt repayment levels in our simplified information and anchored treatments compared to the control treatment. Simplified information increases repayment levels by 3.13 %, on average, when participants can repay the total debt, and by 9.18 % when they can only repay 60 % of the total debt. We also provide evidence on the effect of default pre-filling payment choices on debt repayment. Participants were given a choice box filled with either the number zero or 100 % of the amount due. We find higher debt repayment levels when the default choice is the total amount due. Overall, a higher default amount increases repayment levels by 14.56 %, on average, when participants can repay the total debt, and by 3.14 % when they can only repay 60 % of the total debt.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information simplification and default choices improve financial decisions: A credit card statement experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Jose M. Ortiz ,&nbsp;Lucas I. Teixeira ,&nbsp;Natália N.L. Falcão ,&nbsp;Erika A. Soki ,&nbsp;Raquel M. Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We run a between-subjects experiment to test how better-organized credit card statements, written in simplified language and default choices, help people make better financial decisions. Participants were shown either a standard (control treatment), a simplified, or a simplified with anchored information statement of a credit card bill. While observing the bill, they were asked factual and decision-making questions. We find higher correct response rates and debt repayment levels in our simplified information and anchored treatments compared to the control treatment. Simplified information increases repayment levels by 3.13 %, on average, when participants can repay the total debt, and by 9.18 % when they can only repay 60 % of the total debt. We also provide evidence on the effect of default pre-filling payment choices on debt repayment. Participants were given a choice box filled with either the number zero or 100 % of the amount due. We find higher debt repayment levels when the default choice is the total amount due. Overall, a higher default amount increases repayment levels by 14.56 %, on average, when participants can repay the total debt, and by 3.14 % when they can only repay 60 % of the total debt.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000338\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们进行了一项主体间实验,以检验以简化语言和默认选项编写的、条理更清晰的信用卡账单如何帮助人们做出更好的财务决策。我们向参与者展示了标准(对照处理)、简化或带有锚定信息的简化信用卡账单。在观察账单的同时,我们向他们提出了一些事实性和决策性问题。我们发现,与对照组相比,简化信息和锚定处理的正确回答率和债务偿还水平更高。当参与者能够偿还全部债务时,简化信息平均提高了 3.13% 的偿还水平;当参与者只能偿还全部债务的 60% 时,简化信息平均提高了 9.18%。我们还提供了默认预填付款选择对债务偿还影响的证据。参与者会在选择框中填入零或到期金额的 100%。我们发现,当默认选择为到期总金额时,债务偿还水平较高。总体而言,当参与者能够偿还全部债务时,较高的违约金额会使还款水平平均提高 14.56%,而当他们只能偿还债务总额的 60% 时,则会提高 3.14%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Information simplification and default choices improve financial decisions: A credit card statement experiment.

We run a between-subjects experiment to test how better-organized credit card statements, written in simplified language and default choices, help people make better financial decisions. Participants were shown either a standard (control treatment), a simplified, or a simplified with anchored information statement of a credit card bill. While observing the bill, they were asked factual and decision-making questions. We find higher correct response rates and debt repayment levels in our simplified information and anchored treatments compared to the control treatment. Simplified information increases repayment levels by 3.13 %, on average, when participants can repay the total debt, and by 9.18 % when they can only repay 60 % of the total debt. We also provide evidence on the effect of default pre-filling payment choices on debt repayment. Participants were given a choice box filled with either the number zero or 100 % of the amount due. We find higher debt repayment levels when the default choice is the total amount due. Overall, a higher default amount increases repayment levels by 14.56 %, on average, when participants can repay the total debt, and by 3.14 % when they can only repay 60 % of the total debt.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.
期刊最新文献
Privacy during pandemics: Attitudes to public use of personal data Understanding inconsistencies in risk attitude elicitation games: Evidence from smallholder farmers in five African countries Inflation expectations in the wake of the war in Ukraine Asking for a friend: Reminders and incentives for crowdfunding college savings ‘Update Bias’: Manipulating past information based on the existing circumstances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1