评估 COVID-19 大流行对化脓性链球菌感染的发病率、临床表现和克林霉素耐药率的影响

IF 1.5 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES IJID regions Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.03.004
Daniel N. Marco , José Canela , Maria Brey , Alex Soriano , Cristina Pitart , Sabina Herrera
{"title":"评估 COVID-19 大流行对化脓性链球菌感染的发病率、临床表现和克林霉素耐药率的影响","authors":"Daniel N. Marco ,&nbsp;José Canela ,&nbsp;Maria Brey ,&nbsp;Alex Soriano ,&nbsp;Cristina Pitart ,&nbsp;Sabina Herrera","doi":"10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p><em>Streptococcus pyogenes</em> (group A <em>Streptococcus</em> [GAS]) is a prevalent cause of community-acquired bacterial infections, with invasive GAS (iGAS) infections presenting severe morbimortality. Clindamycin is generally used based on its antitoxin effect. This study investigates changes in iGAS incidence, clinical presentation, outcomes, and clindamycin resistance in an adult cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective analysis of <em>S. pyogenes</em> episodes from a tertiary adult hospital in Barcelona (Spain) between 2015 and 2023. The pre-pandemic period includes data from 2015-2019. The pandemic period, from 2020-2021, and post-pandemic period comprised 2022 to the first semester of 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The global incidence of GAS infections in the pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods were 2.62 and 2.92 cases per 10.000 hospital admissions, whereas for iGAS cases, they were 1.85 and 2.34. However, a transient decrease was observed during the pandemic period: 1.07 and 0.78 per 10.000 hospital admissions. There was a significant decrease in GAS and iGAS infections during the pandemic period compared with the pre-pandemic incidence (<em>P</em> &lt;0.001 for GAS infections and <em>P</em> = 0.001 for iGAS cases) and the post-pandemic incidence (<em>P</em> = 0.032 for GAS infections and <em>P</em> = 0.037 for iGAS cases). The most common source of infection was skin and soft tissue infections with 264 (54%) cases. Skin and soft tissue infections and cases of necrotizing fasciitis increased during the pandemic. Clindamycin resistance occurred in 13.5% of isolations during the pre-pandemic and 17.5% in post-pandemic period (<em>P</em> = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study revealed a temporary reduction in iGAS infections, followed by resurgence in the post-pandemic period. The observed rise in clindamycin resistance emphasizes the importance of monitoring local resistance patterns for tailored treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73335,"journal":{"name":"IJID regions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772707624000195/pdfft?md5=38a10c5bf19deb5afb683a67e1a225f7&pid=1-s2.0-S2772707624000195-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence, clinical presentation, and clindamycin resistance rates of Streptococcus pyogenes infections\",\"authors\":\"Daniel N. Marco ,&nbsp;José Canela ,&nbsp;Maria Brey ,&nbsp;Alex Soriano ,&nbsp;Cristina Pitart ,&nbsp;Sabina Herrera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p><em>Streptococcus pyogenes</em> (group A <em>Streptococcus</em> [GAS]) is a prevalent cause of community-acquired bacterial infections, with invasive GAS (iGAS) infections presenting severe morbimortality. Clindamycin is generally used based on its antitoxin effect. This study investigates changes in iGAS incidence, clinical presentation, outcomes, and clindamycin resistance in an adult cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective analysis of <em>S. pyogenes</em> episodes from a tertiary adult hospital in Barcelona (Spain) between 2015 and 2023. The pre-pandemic period includes data from 2015-2019. The pandemic period, from 2020-2021, and post-pandemic period comprised 2022 to the first semester of 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The global incidence of GAS infections in the pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods were 2.62 and 2.92 cases per 10.000 hospital admissions, whereas for iGAS cases, they were 1.85 and 2.34. However, a transient decrease was observed during the pandemic period: 1.07 and 0.78 per 10.000 hospital admissions. There was a significant decrease in GAS and iGAS infections during the pandemic period compared with the pre-pandemic incidence (<em>P</em> &lt;0.001 for GAS infections and <em>P</em> = 0.001 for iGAS cases) and the post-pandemic incidence (<em>P</em> = 0.032 for GAS infections and <em>P</em> = 0.037 for iGAS cases). The most common source of infection was skin and soft tissue infections with 264 (54%) cases. Skin and soft tissue infections and cases of necrotizing fasciitis increased during the pandemic. Clindamycin resistance occurred in 13.5% of isolations during the pre-pandemic and 17.5% in post-pandemic period (<em>P</em> = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study revealed a temporary reduction in iGAS infections, followed by resurgence in the post-pandemic period. The observed rise in clindamycin resistance emphasizes the importance of monitoring local resistance patterns for tailored treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJID regions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772707624000195/pdfft?md5=38a10c5bf19deb5afb683a67e1a225f7&pid=1-s2.0-S2772707624000195-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJID regions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772707624000195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJID regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772707624000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的化脓性链球菌(A 组链球菌 [GAS])是社区获得性细菌感染的常见病因,其中侵袭性 GAS(iGAS)感染会导致严重的死亡。克林霉素通常是基于其抗毒素作用而使用的。本研究调查了一个成人队列中 iGAS 发病率、临床表现、预后和克林霉素耐药性的变化。大流行前的时期包括 2015-2019 年的数据。大流行前和大流行后的全球 GAS 感染发病率分别为每 10,000 例住院病人中 2.62 例和 2.92 例,而 iGAS 病例的发病率分别为 1.85 例和 2.34 例。然而,在大流行期间出现了短暂的下降:每 10,000 例住院病例中分别有 1.07 例和 0.78 例。在大流行期间,GAS 和 iGAS 感染率与大流行前(GAS 感染率为 P <0.001,iGAS 病例为 P = 0.001)和大流行后(GAS 感染率为 P = 0.032,iGAS 病例为 P = 0.037)相比明显下降。最常见的感染源是皮肤和软组织感染,有 264 例(54%)。皮肤和软组织感染以及坏死性筋膜炎病例在大流行期间有所增加。大流行前,13.5% 的分离菌株对克林霉素产生耐药性,大流行后,17.5% 的分离菌株对克林霉素产生耐药性(P = 0.05)。观察到的克林霉素耐药性的上升强调了监测当地耐药性模式以进行有针对性治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence, clinical presentation, and clindamycin resistance rates of Streptococcus pyogenes infections

Objectives

Streptococcus pyogenes (group A Streptococcus [GAS]) is a prevalent cause of community-acquired bacterial infections, with invasive GAS (iGAS) infections presenting severe morbimortality. Clindamycin is generally used based on its antitoxin effect. This study investigates changes in iGAS incidence, clinical presentation, outcomes, and clindamycin resistance in an adult cohort.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of S. pyogenes episodes from a tertiary adult hospital in Barcelona (Spain) between 2015 and 2023. The pre-pandemic period includes data from 2015-2019. The pandemic period, from 2020-2021, and post-pandemic period comprised 2022 to the first semester of 2023.

Results

The global incidence of GAS infections in the pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods were 2.62 and 2.92 cases per 10.000 hospital admissions, whereas for iGAS cases, they were 1.85 and 2.34. However, a transient decrease was observed during the pandemic period: 1.07 and 0.78 per 10.000 hospital admissions. There was a significant decrease in GAS and iGAS infections during the pandemic period compared with the pre-pandemic incidence (P <0.001 for GAS infections and P = 0.001 for iGAS cases) and the post-pandemic incidence (P = 0.032 for GAS infections and P = 0.037 for iGAS cases). The most common source of infection was skin and soft tissue infections with 264 (54%) cases. Skin and soft tissue infections and cases of necrotizing fasciitis increased during the pandemic. Clindamycin resistance occurred in 13.5% of isolations during the pre-pandemic and 17.5% in post-pandemic period (P = 0.05).

Conclusions

Our study revealed a temporary reduction in iGAS infections, followed by resurgence in the post-pandemic period. The observed rise in clindamycin resistance emphasizes the importance of monitoring local resistance patterns for tailored treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IJID regions
IJID regions Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
64 days
期刊最新文献
Sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections by sex, methamphetamine use, and houselessness before, at, and after HIV diagnosis in Manitoba, Canada Editorial Board Etiology of exudative pleural effusion among adults: differentiating between tuberculous and other causes, a multicenter prospective cohort study The attributable mortality, length of stay, and health care costs of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in Singapore Inter-institutional laboratory standardization for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance through wastewater-based epidemiology applied to Mexico City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1