Afek Chihaoui Mamlouk, Ibrahim Ouergui, Fatma Ben Waer, Fayçal Zarrouk, Nabil Gmada, Mohamed Younes, Ezdine Bouhlel
{"title":"从事力量和耐力训练的运动员的远端-副神经支配和心率变异性。","authors":"Afek Chihaoui Mamlouk, Ibrahim Ouergui, Fatma Ben Waer, Fayçal Zarrouk, Nabil Gmada, Mohamed Younes, Ezdine Bouhlel","doi":"10.1177/00315125241237045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The current study aimed to evaluate the telic-paratelic tendency and heart rate variability in athlete participants from different sports activities.<b>Methods:</b> We assigned 117 healthy participants (<i>M</i> age = 20, <i>SD</i> = 3 years) into three groups according to their training activity: power-trained (PT; n=43), endurance-trained (ET; n=36), and healthy untrained individuals (n=38). We assessed their telic-paratelic tendencies with the validated Telic Dominance Scale and their autonomic nervous system activity with heart rate variability (HRV) analyses.<b>Results:</b> Our findings revealed no significant differences in the telic-paratelic tendencies between ET and PT groups. However, significant differences were observed between athletes and untrained individuals (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Indeed, compared to untrained participants, ET and PT athletes had a greater telic tendency (both <i>p</i> = 0.001), were more focused on planning orientation (ET: <i>p</i> = 0.003; PT: <i>p</i>=0.001), and less often avoided arousal or activation (For ET 31% and for PT 26% of participants). The paratelic tendency was more important in untrained individuals, with most of these participants lacking in seriousmindedness and planning. In addition, we found higher HRV in paratelic ET athletes (SDNN <i>p</i> = 0.050, LF <i>p</i> = 0.022, and LF/HF <i>p</i> = 0.031) compared to their telic peers.<b>Conclusion:</b> our results suggest that sport activity did not influence the telic-paratelic tendency. Nevertheless, this tendency differentiates trained from untrained participants. HRV was higher among paratelic ET athletes, potentially reflecting less stress and more training adaptability in these athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"861-875"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telic-Paratelic Dominance and Heart Rate Variability in Athletes Engaged in Power and Endurance Training.\",\"authors\":\"Afek Chihaoui Mamlouk, Ibrahim Ouergui, Fatma Ben Waer, Fayçal Zarrouk, Nabil Gmada, Mohamed Younes, Ezdine Bouhlel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00315125241237045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The current study aimed to evaluate the telic-paratelic tendency and heart rate variability in athlete participants from different sports activities.<b>Methods:</b> We assigned 117 healthy participants (<i>M</i> age = 20, <i>SD</i> = 3 years) into three groups according to their training activity: power-trained (PT; n=43), endurance-trained (ET; n=36), and healthy untrained individuals (n=38). We assessed their telic-paratelic tendencies with the validated Telic Dominance Scale and their autonomic nervous system activity with heart rate variability (HRV) analyses.<b>Results:</b> Our findings revealed no significant differences in the telic-paratelic tendencies between ET and PT groups. However, significant differences were observed between athletes and untrained individuals (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Indeed, compared to untrained participants, ET and PT athletes had a greater telic tendency (both <i>p</i> = 0.001), were more focused on planning orientation (ET: <i>p</i> = 0.003; PT: <i>p</i>=0.001), and less often avoided arousal or activation (For ET 31% and for PT 26% of participants). The paratelic tendency was more important in untrained individuals, with most of these participants lacking in seriousmindedness and planning. In addition, we found higher HRV in paratelic ET athletes (SDNN <i>p</i> = 0.050, LF <i>p</i> = 0.022, and LF/HF <i>p</i> = 0.031) compared to their telic peers.<b>Conclusion:</b> our results suggest that sport activity did not influence the telic-paratelic tendency. Nevertheless, this tendency differentiates trained from untrained participants. HRV was higher among paratelic ET athletes, potentially reflecting less stress and more training adaptability in these athletes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perceptual and Motor Skills\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"861-875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perceptual and Motor Skills\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241237045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241237045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估不同运动项目运动员的端坐倾向和心率变异性:我们将 117 名健康参与者(中位年龄 = 20 岁,SD = 3 岁)按其训练活动分为三组:力量训练组(PT,43 人)、耐力训练组(ET,36 人)和未受过训练的健康人组(38 人)。我们用有效的 "远动优势量表 "评估了他们的远动-瘫痪倾向,并用心率变异性(HRV)分析评估了他们的自律神经系统活动:结果:我们的研究结果表明,ET 组和 PT 组之间的端坐倾向没有明显差异。但是,运动员和未受过训练的人之间存在明显差异(p = 0.001)。事实上,与未经训练的参与者相比,ET 和 PT 运动员的远视倾向更大(均为 p = 0.001),更专注于规划方向(ET:p = 0.003;PT:p=0.001),更少避免唤醒或激活(ET 31%的参与者和 PT 26%的参与者)。这种偏执倾向在未经训练的人身上表现得更为明显,因为这些人中的大多数人都缺乏严肃认真的态度和计划性。此外,我们还发现,与端坐型运动员相比,端坐型 ET 运动员的心率变异更高(SDNN p = 0.050,LF p = 0.022,LF/HF p = 0.031)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,体育锻炼并不会影响远动-旁动倾向,但这种倾向会将受过训练和未受过训练的参与者区分开来。心率变异在旁侧型 ET 运动员中更高,这可能反映出这些运动员的压力更小,对训练的适应能力更强。
Telic-Paratelic Dominance and Heart Rate Variability in Athletes Engaged in Power and Endurance Training.
Purpose: The current study aimed to evaluate the telic-paratelic tendency and heart rate variability in athlete participants from different sports activities.Methods: We assigned 117 healthy participants (M age = 20, SD = 3 years) into three groups according to their training activity: power-trained (PT; n=43), endurance-trained (ET; n=36), and healthy untrained individuals (n=38). We assessed their telic-paratelic tendencies with the validated Telic Dominance Scale and their autonomic nervous system activity with heart rate variability (HRV) analyses.Results: Our findings revealed no significant differences in the telic-paratelic tendencies between ET and PT groups. However, significant differences were observed between athletes and untrained individuals (p = 0.001). Indeed, compared to untrained participants, ET and PT athletes had a greater telic tendency (both p = 0.001), were more focused on planning orientation (ET: p = 0.003; PT: p=0.001), and less often avoided arousal or activation (For ET 31% and for PT 26% of participants). The paratelic tendency was more important in untrained individuals, with most of these participants lacking in seriousmindedness and planning. In addition, we found higher HRV in paratelic ET athletes (SDNN p = 0.050, LF p = 0.022, and LF/HF p = 0.031) compared to their telic peers.Conclusion: our results suggest that sport activity did not influence the telic-paratelic tendency. Nevertheless, this tendency differentiates trained from untrained participants. HRV was higher among paratelic ET athletes, potentially reflecting less stress and more training adaptability in these athletes.