边缘型人格障碍从青春期到成年早期的过程:五年跟踪研究

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Comprehensive psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152478
Mie Sedoc Jørgensen , Lise Møller , Sune Bo , Mickey Kongerslev , Lene Halling Hastrup , Andrew Chanen , Ole Jakob Storebø , Stig Poulsen , Emma Beck , Erik Simonsen
{"title":"边缘型人格障碍从青春期到成年早期的过程:五年跟踪研究","authors":"Mie Sedoc Jørgensen ,&nbsp;Lise Møller ,&nbsp;Sune Bo ,&nbsp;Mickey Kongerslev ,&nbsp;Lene Halling Hastrup ,&nbsp;Andrew Chanen ,&nbsp;Ole Jakob Storebø ,&nbsp;Stig Poulsen ,&nbsp;Emma Beck ,&nbsp;Erik Simonsen","doi":"10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Studies of the medium- to long-term clinical and functional course for treatment-seeking adolescents with borderline personality disorder (BPD) are lacking. This study aims to outline the psychopathological and functional status of participants, five years after being diagnosed with BPD during adolescence.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants were originally enrolled in a randomized clinical trial that compared mentalization-based group treatment with treatment as usual for adolescents with BPD. Semi-structured interview assessments at five-year follow-up included the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), alcohol, substance and tobacco use, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), complex PTSD, and general functioning were assessed using self-report instruments.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>97 of the original sample of 111 participants (87%) participated. They were aged 19–23 years. The most prevalent disorders were ADHD (59%), any personality disorder (47%) of which half continued to meet criteria for BPD (24%), anxiety disorders (37%), depressive disorders (32%), PTSD or complex PTSD (20%), schizophrenia (16%), and eating disorders (13%). Only 16% did not meet criteria for any mental disorder. Approximately half of the sample were in psychological and/or psychopharmacological treatment at the time of follow-up. Their general functioning remained impaired, with 36% not engaged in education, employment or training (NEET), which is nearly four times the rate of NEET in the same age group in the general population.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although stability of the categorical BPD diagnosis is modest, adolescents meeting diagnostic criteria for BPD show a broad range of poor outcomes at five-year follow-up. BPD appears to be a marker of general maladjustment during adolescence and a harbinger of severe problems during the transition to young adulthood. Early intervention programs for adolescents diagnosed with BPD should focus upon a broad range of functional and psychopathological outcomes, especially social and vocational support, rather than the narrow BPD diagnosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10554,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive psychiatry","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 152478"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X24000294/pdfft?md5=5035205a3b801ccdc3e809ace5ed18cb&pid=1-s2.0-S0010440X24000294-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The course of borderline personality disorder from adolescence to early adulthood: A 5-year follow-up study\",\"authors\":\"Mie Sedoc Jørgensen ,&nbsp;Lise Møller ,&nbsp;Sune Bo ,&nbsp;Mickey Kongerslev ,&nbsp;Lene Halling Hastrup ,&nbsp;Andrew Chanen ,&nbsp;Ole Jakob Storebø ,&nbsp;Stig Poulsen ,&nbsp;Emma Beck ,&nbsp;Erik Simonsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Studies of the medium- to long-term clinical and functional course for treatment-seeking adolescents with borderline personality disorder (BPD) are lacking. This study aims to outline the psychopathological and functional status of participants, five years after being diagnosed with BPD during adolescence.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants were originally enrolled in a randomized clinical trial that compared mentalization-based group treatment with treatment as usual for adolescents with BPD. Semi-structured interview assessments at five-year follow-up included the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), alcohol, substance and tobacco use, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), complex PTSD, and general functioning were assessed using self-report instruments.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>97 of the original sample of 111 participants (87%) participated. They were aged 19–23 years. The most prevalent disorders were ADHD (59%), any personality disorder (47%) of which half continued to meet criteria for BPD (24%), anxiety disorders (37%), depressive disorders (32%), PTSD or complex PTSD (20%), schizophrenia (16%), and eating disorders (13%). Only 16% did not meet criteria for any mental disorder. Approximately half of the sample were in psychological and/or psychopharmacological treatment at the time of follow-up. Their general functioning remained impaired, with 36% not engaged in education, employment or training (NEET), which is nearly four times the rate of NEET in the same age group in the general population.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although stability of the categorical BPD diagnosis is modest, adolescents meeting diagnostic criteria for BPD show a broad range of poor outcomes at five-year follow-up. BPD appears to be a marker of general maladjustment during adolescence and a harbinger of severe problems during the transition to young adulthood. Early intervention programs for adolescents diagnosed with BPD should focus upon a broad range of functional and psychopathological outcomes, especially social and vocational support, rather than the narrow BPD diagnosis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comprehensive psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X24000294/pdfft?md5=5035205a3b801ccdc3e809ace5ed18cb&pid=1-s2.0-S0010440X24000294-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comprehensive psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X24000294\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X24000294","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景缺乏对寻求治疗的边缘型人格障碍(BPD)青少年中长期临床和功能状况的研究。本研究旨在概述参与者在青春期被诊断出患有边缘型人格障碍五年后的精神病理学和功能状况。方法参与者最初参加了一项随机临床试验,该试验比较了对患有边缘型人格障碍的青少年进行的以精神化为基础的小组治疗和常规治疗。五年随访时的半结构化访谈评估包括神经精神病学临床评估表和DSM-5人格障碍结构化临床访谈。使用自我报告工具对注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)、酒精、药物和烟草使用、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、复杂创伤后应激障碍和一般功能进行了评估。他们的年龄在 19-23 岁之间。最常见的疾病是多动症(59%)、任何人格障碍(47%),其中半数仍符合 BPD 标准(24%)、焦虑症(37%)、抑郁症(32%)、创伤后应激障碍或复合型创伤后应激障碍(20%)、精神分裂症(16%)和进食障碍(13%)。只有 16% 的人不符合任何精神障碍的标准。在随访时,约有一半的样本正在接受心理和/或精神药物治疗。结论虽然BPD分类诊断的稳定性不高,但符合BPD诊断标准的青少年在五年随访中表现出广泛的不良后果。BPD似乎是青少年时期普遍适应不良的标志,也是向青年期过渡时出现严重问题的先兆。针对被诊断为BPD的青少年的早期干预计划应侧重于广泛的功能和心理病理结果,特别是社会和职业支持,而不是狭隘的BPD诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The course of borderline personality disorder from adolescence to early adulthood: A 5-year follow-up study

Background

Studies of the medium- to long-term clinical and functional course for treatment-seeking adolescents with borderline personality disorder (BPD) are lacking. This study aims to outline the psychopathological and functional status of participants, five years after being diagnosed with BPD during adolescence.

Methods

Participants were originally enrolled in a randomized clinical trial that compared mentalization-based group treatment with treatment as usual for adolescents with BPD. Semi-structured interview assessments at five-year follow-up included the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), alcohol, substance and tobacco use, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), complex PTSD, and general functioning were assessed using self-report instruments.

Results

97 of the original sample of 111 participants (87%) participated. They were aged 19–23 years. The most prevalent disorders were ADHD (59%), any personality disorder (47%) of which half continued to meet criteria for BPD (24%), anxiety disorders (37%), depressive disorders (32%), PTSD or complex PTSD (20%), schizophrenia (16%), and eating disorders (13%). Only 16% did not meet criteria for any mental disorder. Approximately half of the sample were in psychological and/or psychopharmacological treatment at the time of follow-up. Their general functioning remained impaired, with 36% not engaged in education, employment or training (NEET), which is nearly four times the rate of NEET in the same age group in the general population.

Conclusions

Although stability of the categorical BPD diagnosis is modest, adolescents meeting diagnostic criteria for BPD show a broad range of poor outcomes at five-year follow-up. BPD appears to be a marker of general maladjustment during adolescence and a harbinger of severe problems during the transition to young adulthood. Early intervention programs for adolescents diagnosed with BPD should focus upon a broad range of functional and psychopathological outcomes, especially social and vocational support, rather than the narrow BPD diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comprehensive psychiatry
Comprehensive psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: "Comprehensive Psychiatry" is an open access, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the field of psychiatry and mental health. Its primary mission is to share the latest advancements in knowledge to enhance patient care and deepen the understanding of mental illnesses. The journal is supported by a diverse team of international editors and peer reviewers, ensuring the publication of high-quality research with a strong focus on clinical relevance and the implications for psychopathology. "Comprehensive Psychiatry" encourages authors to present their research in an accessible manner, facilitating engagement with clinicians, policymakers, and the broader public. By embracing an open access policy, the journal aims to maximize the global impact of its content, making it readily available to a wide audience and fostering scientific collaboration and public awareness beyond the traditional academic community. This approach is designed to promote a more inclusive and informed dialogue on mental health, contributing to the overall progress in the field.
期刊最新文献
Adequacy of treatment in outpatients with obsessive-compulsive disorder A comparison of firefighter mental health education programs: A descriptive thematic analysis of firefighter experiences Acceptability, tolerability and safety of the BRIGhTMIND trial: Connectivity-guided intermittent theta-burst stimulation versus F3- repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression Exercise moderates longitudinal group psychopathology networks in individuals with eating disorders The deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii) as a model organism to explore the naturalistic psychobiological mechanisms contributing to compulsive-like rigidity: A narrative overview of advances and opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1