透过压缩玻璃:语言复杂性和压缩字符串的语言结构

IF 1.1 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistics Vanguard Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1515/lingvan-2022-0140
Katharina Ehret
{"title":"透过压缩玻璃:语言复杂性和压缩字符串的语言结构","authors":"Katharina Ehret","doi":"10.1515/lingvan-2022-0140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Against the backdrop of the sociolinguistic-typological complexity debate which is all about measuring, comparing and explaining language complexity, this article investigates how Kolmogorov-based information theoretic complexity relates to linguistic structures. Specifically, the linguistic structure of text which has been compressed with the text compression algorithm <jats:italic>gzip</jats:italic> will be analysed. One implementation of Kolmogorov-based language complexity is the compression technique (Ehret, Katharina. 2021. An information-theoretic view on language complexity and register variation: Compressing naturalistic corpus data. <jats:italic>Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory</jats:italic> (2). 383–410) which employs <jats:italic>gzip</jats:italic> to measure language complexity in naturalistic text samples. In order to determine what type of structures compression algorithms like <jats:italic>gzip</jats:italic> capture, and how these compressed strings relate to linguistically meaningful structures, <jats:italic>gzip</jats:italic>’s lexicon output is retrieved and subjected to an in-depth analysis. As a case study, the compression technique is applied to the English version of Lewis Carroll’s <jats:italic>Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland</jats:italic> and its lexicon output is extracted. The results show that <jats:italic>gzip</jats:italic>-like algorithms sometimes capture linguistically meaningful structures which coincide, for instance, with lexical words or suffixes. However, many compressed sequences are linguistically unintelligible or simply do not coincide with any linguistically meaningful structures. Compression algorithms like <jats:italic>gzip</jats:italic> thus crucially capture purely formal structural regularities. As a consequence, information theoretic complexity, in this context, is a linguistically agnostic, purely structural measure of regularity and redundancy in texts.","PeriodicalId":55960,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics Vanguard","volume":"304 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Through the compression glass: language complexity and the linguistic structure of compressed strings\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Ehret\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/lingvan-2022-0140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Against the backdrop of the sociolinguistic-typological complexity debate which is all about measuring, comparing and explaining language complexity, this article investigates how Kolmogorov-based information theoretic complexity relates to linguistic structures. Specifically, the linguistic structure of text which has been compressed with the text compression algorithm <jats:italic>gzip</jats:italic> will be analysed. One implementation of Kolmogorov-based language complexity is the compression technique (Ehret, Katharina. 2021. An information-theoretic view on language complexity and register variation: Compressing naturalistic corpus data. <jats:italic>Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory</jats:italic> (2). 383–410) which employs <jats:italic>gzip</jats:italic> to measure language complexity in naturalistic text samples. In order to determine what type of structures compression algorithms like <jats:italic>gzip</jats:italic> capture, and how these compressed strings relate to linguistically meaningful structures, <jats:italic>gzip</jats:italic>’s lexicon output is retrieved and subjected to an in-depth analysis. As a case study, the compression technique is applied to the English version of Lewis Carroll’s <jats:italic>Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland</jats:italic> and its lexicon output is extracted. The results show that <jats:italic>gzip</jats:italic>-like algorithms sometimes capture linguistically meaningful structures which coincide, for instance, with lexical words or suffixes. However, many compressed sequences are linguistically unintelligible or simply do not coincide with any linguistically meaningful structures. Compression algorithms like <jats:italic>gzip</jats:italic> thus crucially capture purely formal structural regularities. As a consequence, information theoretic complexity, in this context, is a linguistically agnostic, purely structural measure of regularity and redundancy in texts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics Vanguard\",\"volume\":\"304 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics Vanguard\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0140\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics Vanguard","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会语言学与表型复杂性的争论涉及语言复杂性的测量、比较和解释,本文以这一争论为背景,研究基于科尔莫戈罗夫信息论的复杂性与语言结构的关系。具体来说,本文将分析使用文本压缩算法 gzip 压缩的文本的语言结构。基于柯尔莫哥洛夫的语言复杂性的一种实现方式是压缩技术(Ehret, Katharina.2021.语言复杂性和语域变异的信息论观点:压缩自然语料库数据。语料库语言学和语言学理论》(2)。383-410),它采用 gzip 来测量自然文本样本中的语言复杂性。为了确定像 gzip 这样的压缩算法能捕捉到哪些类型的结构,以及这些压缩字符串与语言意义结构之间的关系,我们检索了 gzip 的词典输出,并对其进行了深入分析。作为一项案例研究,我们将压缩技术应用于刘易斯-卡罗尔的《爱丽丝漫游奇境记》的英文版,并提取了其词典输出。结果表明,类似 gzip 的算法有时会捕捉到有语言意义的结构,这些结构与词汇或后缀等相吻合。然而,许多压缩序列在语言上是不可理解的,或者根本不与任何有语言意义的结构相吻合。因此,像 gzip 这样的压缩算法关键在于捕捉纯粹的形式结构规律性。因此,在这种情况下,信息论复杂性是一种与语言无关的、纯结构性的文本规则性和冗余性测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Through the compression glass: language complexity and the linguistic structure of compressed strings
Against the backdrop of the sociolinguistic-typological complexity debate which is all about measuring, comparing and explaining language complexity, this article investigates how Kolmogorov-based information theoretic complexity relates to linguistic structures. Specifically, the linguistic structure of text which has been compressed with the text compression algorithm gzip will be analysed. One implementation of Kolmogorov-based language complexity is the compression technique (Ehret, Katharina. 2021. An information-theoretic view on language complexity and register variation: Compressing naturalistic corpus data. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory (2). 383–410) which employs gzip to measure language complexity in naturalistic text samples. In order to determine what type of structures compression algorithms like gzip capture, and how these compressed strings relate to linguistically meaningful structures, gzip’s lexicon output is retrieved and subjected to an in-depth analysis. As a case study, the compression technique is applied to the English version of Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and its lexicon output is extracted. The results show that gzip-like algorithms sometimes capture linguistically meaningful structures which coincide, for instance, with lexical words or suffixes. However, many compressed sequences are linguistically unintelligible or simply do not coincide with any linguistically meaningful structures. Compression algorithms like gzip thus crucially capture purely formal structural regularities. As a consequence, information theoretic complexity, in this context, is a linguistically agnostic, purely structural measure of regularity and redundancy in texts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Linguistics Vanguard is a new channel for high quality articles and innovative approaches in all major fields of linguistics. This multimodal journal is published solely online and provides an accessible platform supporting both traditional and new kinds of publications. Linguistics Vanguard seeks to publish concise and up-to-date reports on the state of the art in linguistics as well as cutting-edge research papers. With its topical breadth of coverage and anticipated quick rate of production, it is one of the leading platforms for scientific exchange in linguistics. Its broad theoretical range, international scope, and diversity of article formats engage students and scholars alike. All topics within linguistics are welcome. The journal especially encourages submissions taking advantage of its new multimodal platform designed to integrate interactive content, including audio and video, images, maps, software code, raw data, and any other media that enhances the traditional written word. The novel platform and concise article format allows for rapid turnaround of submissions. Full peer review assures quality and enables authors to receive appropriate credit for their work. The journal publishes general submissions as well as special collections. Ideas for special collections may be submitted to the editors for consideration.
期刊最新文献
From sociolinguistic perception to strategic action in the study of social meaning. Sign recognition: the effect of parameters and features in sign mispronunciations. The use of the narrative final vowel -á by the Lingala-speaking youth of Kinshasa: from anterior to near/recent past Re-taking the field: resuming in-person fieldwork amid the COVID-19 pandemic Bibliographic bias and information-density sampling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1