走向税收文化社会学

IF 3.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Socio-Economic Review Pub Date : 2024-03-23 DOI:10.1093/ser/mwae017
Ruth Braunstein
{"title":"走向税收文化社会学","authors":"Ruth Braunstein","doi":"10.1093/ser/mwae017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article advances calls for a cultural sociology of taxation by arguing that Zelizer’s theory of how monetary exchanges perform ‘relational work’ can be applied to taxpaying. Based on a review of research on taxpaying in the USA, I show this approach offers insight into a disparate set of puzzles about taxation including: why the USA continues to require income tax returns; why anti-tax sentiment persists even at low tax rates; why anti-government conservatives support some social spending; and whether linking taxpaying to citizenship promotes solidarity or racialized hierarchies. Recognizing that taxpaying involves relational work also reveals continuities with other forms of monetary exchange; and supplies evidence that relational work is performed at higher levels of relational abstraction than previously understood. While this article only gestures toward these possibilities, I hope it stimulates future research that fulfills the new fiscal sociology’s aspirations for a cultural sociology of taxation.","PeriodicalId":47947,"journal":{"name":"Socio-Economic Review","volume":"185 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a cultural sociology of taxation\",\"authors\":\"Ruth Braunstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ser/mwae017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article advances calls for a cultural sociology of taxation by arguing that Zelizer’s theory of how monetary exchanges perform ‘relational work’ can be applied to taxpaying. Based on a review of research on taxpaying in the USA, I show this approach offers insight into a disparate set of puzzles about taxation including: why the USA continues to require income tax returns; why anti-tax sentiment persists even at low tax rates; why anti-government conservatives support some social spending; and whether linking taxpaying to citizenship promotes solidarity or racialized hierarchies. Recognizing that taxpaying involves relational work also reveals continuities with other forms of monetary exchange; and supplies evidence that relational work is performed at higher levels of relational abstraction than previously understood. While this article only gestures toward these possibilities, I hope it stimulates future research that fulfills the new fiscal sociology’s aspirations for a cultural sociology of taxation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socio-Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"185 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socio-Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwae017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwae017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过论证泽利泽关于货币交换如何执行 "关系工作 "的理论可以应用于纳税,从而推动了对税收文化社会学的呼吁。基于对美国纳税问题研究的回顾,我表明这种方法能够深入揭示有关税收的一系列不同谜题,包括:为什么美国继续要求申报所得税;为什么即使税率很低,反税情绪依然存在;为什么反政府的保守派支持某些社会支出;以及将纳税与公民身份联系起来是促进团结还是种族等级制度。认识到纳税涉及关系工作,还揭示了与其他形式货币交换的连续性;并提供证据表明,关系工作是在比以往理解的更高的关系抽象水平上进行的。虽然本文只是对这些可能性做了一些姿态,但我希望它能激发未来的研究,以实现新财政社会学对税收文化社会学的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward a cultural sociology of taxation
This article advances calls for a cultural sociology of taxation by arguing that Zelizer’s theory of how monetary exchanges perform ‘relational work’ can be applied to taxpaying. Based on a review of research on taxpaying in the USA, I show this approach offers insight into a disparate set of puzzles about taxation including: why the USA continues to require income tax returns; why anti-tax sentiment persists even at low tax rates; why anti-government conservatives support some social spending; and whether linking taxpaying to citizenship promotes solidarity or racialized hierarchies. Recognizing that taxpaying involves relational work also reveals continuities with other forms of monetary exchange; and supplies evidence that relational work is performed at higher levels of relational abstraction than previously understood. While this article only gestures toward these possibilities, I hope it stimulates future research that fulfills the new fiscal sociology’s aspirations for a cultural sociology of taxation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.80%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Originating in the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics (SASE), Socio-Economic Review (SER) is part of a broader movement in the social sciences for the rediscovery of the socio-political foundations of the economy. Devoted to the advancement of socio-economics, it deals with the analytical, political and moral questions arising at the intersection between economy and society. Articles in SER explore how the economy is or should be governed by social relations, institutional rules, political decisions, and cultural values. They also consider how the economy in turn affects the society of which it is part, for example by breaking up old institutional forms and giving rise to new ones. The domain of the journal is deliberately broadly conceived, so new variations to its general theme may be discovered and editors can learn from the papers that readers submit. To enhance international dialogue, Socio-Economic Review accepts the submission of translated articles that are simultaneously published in a language other than English. In pursuit of its program, SER is eager to promote interdisciplinary dialogue between sociology, economics, political science and moral philosophy, through both empirical and theoretical work. Empirical papers may be qualitative as well as quantitative, and theoretical papers will not be confined to deductive model-building. Papers suggestive of more generalizable insights into the economy as a domain of social action will be preferred over narrowly specialized work. While firmly committed to the highest standards of scholarly excellence, Socio-Economic Review encourages discussion of the practical and ethical dimensions of economic action, with the intention to contribute to both the advancement of social science and the building of a good economy in a good society.
期刊最新文献
The labor of assetization: producing ‘hypergrowth’ inside a tech startup Where are inequalities produced? Comparing the variations of graduate employment between the UK’s districts and universities The moral accounting of debts: productivity, deservingness and the consensual creation of Chapter XIII bankruptcy Why right-wing governments restrict market competition: a demographic theory Countermovements from the core: the assetization of pharmaceuticals, transparency activism and the access to medicines movement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1