冷冻解冻周期中双分裂期胚胎移植与单囊胚移植的回顾性比较研究

IF 1.6 Q4 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY Middle East Fertility Society Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1186/s43043-024-00177-7
Yun-Hsuen Lim, Poo Keen Sim, Prashant Nadkarni
{"title":"冷冻解冻周期中双分裂期胚胎移植与单囊胚移植的回顾性比较研究","authors":"Yun-Hsuen Lim, Poo Keen Sim, Prashant Nadkarni","doi":"10.1186/s43043-024-00177-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of day 3 double embryo transfer (DET) with single blastocyst transfer (SBT) during frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. A total of 999 women below the age of 38 years who underwent FET at Malaysia’s KL Fertility and Gynaecology Centre from January 2019 to December 2021 were analyzed. Patients with autologous eggs were recruited in the study. All the eggs were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The embryos were vitrified on day 3 cleavage-stage or blastocyst stage with Cryotop® method. The FET was performed following natural cycle (NC), modified natural cycle (m-NC), or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycles. The NC and m-NC groups received oral dydrogesterone for luteal phase support. There were no statistical differences in the rates of positive pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy between the two groups. However, implantation rates were significantly higher in the SBT group (50.1% versus 37.6%, p < 0.05). The day 3 DET group had significantly higher multiple pregnancy rates (28.7% versus 1.1%, p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis of embryo transfers performed following NC, m-NC, or HRT cycles showed similar results. This study suggests that SBT is the better choice for embryo transfers as it had higher implantation rates and its pregnancy rates were similar to day 3 DET. The SBT also significantly reduced the incidence of multiple pregnancies without compromising pregnancy rates.","PeriodicalId":18532,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Fertility Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective comparative study of double cleavage-stage embryo transfer versus single blastocyst in frozen-thawed cycles\",\"authors\":\"Yun-Hsuen Lim, Poo Keen Sim, Prashant Nadkarni\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43043-024-00177-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of day 3 double embryo transfer (DET) with single blastocyst transfer (SBT) during frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. A total of 999 women below the age of 38 years who underwent FET at Malaysia’s KL Fertility and Gynaecology Centre from January 2019 to December 2021 were analyzed. Patients with autologous eggs were recruited in the study. All the eggs were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The embryos were vitrified on day 3 cleavage-stage or blastocyst stage with Cryotop® method. The FET was performed following natural cycle (NC), modified natural cycle (m-NC), or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycles. The NC and m-NC groups received oral dydrogesterone for luteal phase support. There were no statistical differences in the rates of positive pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy between the two groups. However, implantation rates were significantly higher in the SBT group (50.1% versus 37.6%, p < 0.05). The day 3 DET group had significantly higher multiple pregnancy rates (28.7% versus 1.1%, p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis of embryo transfers performed following NC, m-NC, or HRT cycles showed similar results. This study suggests that SBT is the better choice for embryo transfers as it had higher implantation rates and its pregnancy rates were similar to day 3 DET. The SBT also significantly reduced the incidence of multiple pregnancies without compromising pregnancy rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Fertility Society Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Fertility Society Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-024-00177-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Fertility Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-024-00177-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项回顾性研究旨在比较冷冻胚胎移植(FET)周期中第3天双胚胎移植(DET)与单囊胚移植(SBT)的结果。研究分析了2019年1月至2021年12月期间在马来西亚吉隆坡生育与妇科中心接受FET的999名38岁以下女性。研究招募了拥有自体卵子的患者。所有卵子均通过卵胞浆内单精子注射进行人工授精。胚胎在第 3 天分裂期或囊胚期用 Cryotop® 方法进行玻璃化处理。胚胎移植是在自然周期(NC)、改良自然周期(m-NC)或激素替代疗法(HRT)周期后进行的。自然周期组和改良自然周期组均口服地屈孕酮以支持黄体期。两组在阳性妊娠率、临床妊娠率和持续妊娠率方面没有统计学差异。然而,SBT 组的植入率明显更高(50.1% 对 37.6%,P < 0.05)。第 3 天 DET 组的多胎妊娠率明显更高(28.7% 对 1.1%,P < 0.05)。对 NC、m-NC 或 HRT 周期后进行的胚胎移植进行的分组分析显示了相似的结果。这项研究表明,SBT 是胚胎移植的更好选择,因为它的植入率更高,妊娠率与第 3 天 DET 相似。SBT 还能显著降低多胎妊娠的发生率,同时不影响妊娠率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A retrospective comparative study of double cleavage-stage embryo transfer versus single blastocyst in frozen-thawed cycles
This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of day 3 double embryo transfer (DET) with single blastocyst transfer (SBT) during frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. A total of 999 women below the age of 38 years who underwent FET at Malaysia’s KL Fertility and Gynaecology Centre from January 2019 to December 2021 were analyzed. Patients with autologous eggs were recruited in the study. All the eggs were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The embryos were vitrified on day 3 cleavage-stage or blastocyst stage with Cryotop® method. The FET was performed following natural cycle (NC), modified natural cycle (m-NC), or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycles. The NC and m-NC groups received oral dydrogesterone for luteal phase support. There were no statistical differences in the rates of positive pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy between the two groups. However, implantation rates were significantly higher in the SBT group (50.1% versus 37.6%, p < 0.05). The day 3 DET group had significantly higher multiple pregnancy rates (28.7% versus 1.1%, p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis of embryo transfers performed following NC, m-NC, or HRT cycles showed similar results. This study suggests that SBT is the better choice for embryo transfers as it had higher implantation rates and its pregnancy rates were similar to day 3 DET. The SBT also significantly reduced the incidence of multiple pregnancies without compromising pregnancy rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the effectiveness and adverse effects of oral versus transdermal estradiol for endometrial preparation in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial The effect of vitamin D on the hormonal profile of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis Semen in the time of COVID-19: a narrative review of current evidence and implications for fertility and reproductive health From uncertain to certain—how to proceed with variants of uncertain significance Stigma and depression among obese infertile women: a cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1