令人费解的斯蒂芬-玻尔兹曼定律:经典物理学还是量子物理学

IF 1.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Fluctuation and Noise Letters Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1142/s0219477524310011
Lino Reggiani, Eleonora Alfinito
{"title":"令人费解的斯蒂芬-玻尔兹曼定律:经典物理学还是量子物理学","authors":"Lino Reggiani, Eleonora Alfinito","doi":"10.1142/s0219477524310011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stefan–Boltzmann law, stating the fourth power temperature dependence of the radiation emission by a black-body, was empirically formulated by Stefan in 1874 by fitting existing experiments and theoretically validated by Boltzmann in 1884 on the basis of a classical physical model involving thermodynamics principles and the radiation pressure predicted by Maxwell equations. At first sight the electromagnetic (EM) gas assumed by Boltzmann and following Rayleigh (1900) identifiable as an ensemble of <i>N</i> classical normal-modes, looks like an extension of the classical model of the massive ideal-gas. Accordingly, for this EM gas the internal total energy, <i>U</i>, was assumed to be function of volume <i>V</i> and temperature <i>T</i> as <span><math altimg=\"eq-00001.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><mi>U</mi><mo>=</mo><mi>U</mi><mo stretchy=\"false\">(</mo><mi>V</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>T</mi><mo stretchy=\"false\">)</mo></math></span><span></span>, and the equation of state was given by <span><math altimg=\"eq-00002.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><mi>U</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>3</mn><mi>P</mi><mi>V</mi></math></span><span></span>, with <i>P</i> the radiation pressure. In addition, Boltzmann implicitly assumed that, for given values of <i>V</i> and <i>T</i>, <i>U</i> and the number of modes <i>N</i> would take finite values. However, from one hand these assumptions are not justified by Maxwell equations and classical statistics since, in vacuum (i.e., far from the EM sources), the values of <i>N</i> and <i>U</i> diverge, the so-called ultraviolet catastrophe introduced by Ehrenfest in 1911. From another hand, Boltzmann derivation of Stefan law is found to be macroscopically compatible with its derivation from quantum statistics announced by Planck in 1901. In this paper, we present a justification of this puzzling classical/quantum compatibility by noticing that the implicit assumptions made by Boltzmann is fully justified by Planck quantum statistics. Furthermore, we shed new light on the interpretation of recent classical simulations of a black body carried out by Wang, Casati, and Benenti in 2022 who found an analogous puzzling consistency between Stefan–Boltzmann law and their simulations to induce speculations on classical physics and black body radiation that are claimed to require a critical reconsideration of the role of classical physics for the understanding of quantum mechanics.</p>","PeriodicalId":55155,"journal":{"name":"Fluctuation and Noise Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Puzzling of Stefan–Boltzmann Law: Classical or Quantum Physics\",\"authors\":\"Lino Reggiani, Eleonora Alfinito\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s0219477524310011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Stefan–Boltzmann law, stating the fourth power temperature dependence of the radiation emission by a black-body, was empirically formulated by Stefan in 1874 by fitting existing experiments and theoretically validated by Boltzmann in 1884 on the basis of a classical physical model involving thermodynamics principles and the radiation pressure predicted by Maxwell equations. At first sight the electromagnetic (EM) gas assumed by Boltzmann and following Rayleigh (1900) identifiable as an ensemble of <i>N</i> classical normal-modes, looks like an extension of the classical model of the massive ideal-gas. Accordingly, for this EM gas the internal total energy, <i>U</i>, was assumed to be function of volume <i>V</i> and temperature <i>T</i> as <span><math altimg=\\\"eq-00001.gif\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><mi>U</mi><mo>=</mo><mi>U</mi><mo stretchy=\\\"false\\\">(</mo><mi>V</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>T</mi><mo stretchy=\\\"false\\\">)</mo></math></span><span></span>, and the equation of state was given by <span><math altimg=\\\"eq-00002.gif\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><mi>U</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>3</mn><mi>P</mi><mi>V</mi></math></span><span></span>, with <i>P</i> the radiation pressure. In addition, Boltzmann implicitly assumed that, for given values of <i>V</i> and <i>T</i>, <i>U</i> and the number of modes <i>N</i> would take finite values. However, from one hand these assumptions are not justified by Maxwell equations and classical statistics since, in vacuum (i.e., far from the EM sources), the values of <i>N</i> and <i>U</i> diverge, the so-called ultraviolet catastrophe introduced by Ehrenfest in 1911. From another hand, Boltzmann derivation of Stefan law is found to be macroscopically compatible with its derivation from quantum statistics announced by Planck in 1901. In this paper, we present a justification of this puzzling classical/quantum compatibility by noticing that the implicit assumptions made by Boltzmann is fully justified by Planck quantum statistics. Furthermore, we shed new light on the interpretation of recent classical simulations of a black body carried out by Wang, Casati, and Benenti in 2022 who found an analogous puzzling consistency between Stefan–Boltzmann law and their simulations to induce speculations on classical physics and black body radiation that are claimed to require a critical reconsideration of the role of classical physics for the understanding of quantum mechanics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fluctuation and Noise Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fluctuation and Noise Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219477524310011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluctuation and Noise Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219477524310011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

斯特凡-玻尔兹曼定律说明了黑体辐射发射的四次方温度依赖性,1874 年由斯特凡通过拟合现有实验从经验上提出,1884 年由玻尔兹曼在涉及热力学原理和麦克斯韦方程预测的辐射压力的经典物理模型基础上从理论上进行了验证。乍一看,玻尔兹曼假定的电磁气体(EM)和瑞利(1900 年)假定的可识别的 N 个经典正交模态的集合,就像是大质量理想气体经典模型的延伸。因此,对于这种电磁气体,内部总能量 U 被假定为体积 V 和温度 T 的函数,即 U=U(V,T),状态方程为 U=3PV,P 为辐射压力。此外,玻尔兹曼还隐含地假定,对于给定的 V 和 T 值,U 和模式数 N 将取有限值。然而,一方面,麦克斯韦方程组和经典统计学并不能证明这些假设是正确的,因为在真空中(即远离电磁源),N 和 U 的值会发散,这就是艾伦费斯特(Ehrenfest)在 1911 年提出的所谓紫外线灾难。另一方面,玻尔兹曼对斯蒂芬定律的推导与普朗克 1901 年宣布的量子统计推导在宏观上是一致的。在本文中,我们注意到玻尔兹曼所做的隐含假设完全符合普朗克量子统计,从而为这一令人费解的经典/量子兼容性提出了解释。此外,我们还对 Wang、Casati 和 Benenti 最近于 2022 年进行的黑体经典模拟的解释进行了新的阐释,他们发现斯蒂芬-玻尔兹曼定律与他们的模拟之间存在类似的令人费解的一致性,从而引发了对经典物理学和黑体辐射的猜测,这些猜测被认为需要对经典物理学在理解量子力学方面的作用进行批判性的重新考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Puzzling of Stefan–Boltzmann Law: Classical or Quantum Physics

Stefan–Boltzmann law, stating the fourth power temperature dependence of the radiation emission by a black-body, was empirically formulated by Stefan in 1874 by fitting existing experiments and theoretically validated by Boltzmann in 1884 on the basis of a classical physical model involving thermodynamics principles and the radiation pressure predicted by Maxwell equations. At first sight the electromagnetic (EM) gas assumed by Boltzmann and following Rayleigh (1900) identifiable as an ensemble of N classical normal-modes, looks like an extension of the classical model of the massive ideal-gas. Accordingly, for this EM gas the internal total energy, U, was assumed to be function of volume V and temperature T as U=U(V,T), and the equation of state was given by U=3PV, with P the radiation pressure. In addition, Boltzmann implicitly assumed that, for given values of V and T, U and the number of modes N would take finite values. However, from one hand these assumptions are not justified by Maxwell equations and classical statistics since, in vacuum (i.e., far from the EM sources), the values of N and U diverge, the so-called ultraviolet catastrophe introduced by Ehrenfest in 1911. From another hand, Boltzmann derivation of Stefan law is found to be macroscopically compatible with its derivation from quantum statistics announced by Planck in 1901. In this paper, we present a justification of this puzzling classical/quantum compatibility by noticing that the implicit assumptions made by Boltzmann is fully justified by Planck quantum statistics. Furthermore, we shed new light on the interpretation of recent classical simulations of a black body carried out by Wang, Casati, and Benenti in 2022 who found an analogous puzzling consistency between Stefan–Boltzmann law and their simulations to induce speculations on classical physics and black body radiation that are claimed to require a critical reconsideration of the role of classical physics for the understanding of quantum mechanics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fluctuation and Noise Letters
Fluctuation and Noise Letters 工程技术-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
22.20%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Fluctuation and Noise Letters (FNL) is unique. It is the only specialist journal for fluctuations and noise, and it covers that topic throughout the whole of science in a completely interdisciplinary way. High standards of refereeing and editorial judgment are guaranteed by the selection of Editors from among the leading scientists of the field. FNL places equal emphasis on both fundamental and applied science and the name "Letters" is to indicate speed of publication, rather than a limitation on the lengths of papers. The journal uses on-line submission and provides for immediate on-line publication of accepted papers. FNL is interested in interdisciplinary articles on random fluctuations, quite generally. For example: noise enhanced phenomena including stochastic resonance; 1/f noise; shot noise; fluctuation-dissipation; cardiovascular dynamics; ion channels; single molecules; neural systems; quantum fluctuations; quantum computation; classical and quantum information; statistical physics; degradation and aging phenomena; percolation systems; fluctuations in social systems; traffic; the stock market; environment and climate; etc.
期刊最新文献
Intelligent adaptive networks for chaos analysis in stochastic SIS differential epidemic model with the impact of unpredictable environmental factors Sentiment Analysis for Stock Market Prediction Using Recursive Deep Neural Networks Research and application of two-dimensional time-delayed tri-stable stochastic resonance system for bearing fault detection Multi-Response Bridge Regularization Parameter Selection via Multivariate Generalized Information Criterion Sustainable Development: Impact of FDI and Corruption Mitigation Within BRI Nations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1