利用相对积极影响指数(RPII)评估城市振兴的社会文化影响

Q1 Arts and Humanities Built Heritage Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1186/s43238-024-00118-3
Shahim Abdurahiman, A. K. Kasthurba, Afifa Nuzhat
{"title":"利用相对积极影响指数(RPII)评估城市振兴的社会文化影响","authors":"Shahim Abdurahiman, A. K. Kasthurba, Afifa Nuzhat","doi":"10.1186/s43238-024-00118-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban heritage is a vital resource that connects communities to their local identity. Unplanned developments and rapid urbanisation often harm the authenticity of historic areas, disrupting the cultural fabric and altering their character. This study introduces the Relative Positive Impact Index (RPII), a novel technique for assessing the socio-cultural impacts of urban revitalisation. The significance of RPII lies in its ability to quantitatively evaluate the impacts on the cultural fabric and integrity of historic urban areas, which is crucial for sustainable urban development. The study’s objective is to apply RPII in evaluating qualitative socio-cultural characteristics in historic urban areas, with a focus on four main criteria and 16 sub-criteria, in the case of the Kuttichira precinct. The methodology integrates the analysis of published literature, a quantitative survey mapping the stakeholders’ perception, and qualitative insights. This approach facilitates an in-depth understanding of how urban revitalisation affects local socio-cultural dynamics, preserving the authenticity and character of historic areas. The study reveals that the revitalisation project in Kuttichira positively impacts the socio-cultural fabric of the area, maintaining cultural integrity and addressing social challenges. These findings offer valuable insights for sustainable urban development and policymaking in historic areas. The study recommends the application of RPII in other urban precincts for comparative analysis and further development of urban development practices, contributing to informed urban policy and planning decisions.","PeriodicalId":33925,"journal":{"name":"Built Heritage","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the socio-cultural impact of urban revitalisation using Relative Positive Impact Index (RPII)\",\"authors\":\"Shahim Abdurahiman, A. K. Kasthurba, Afifa Nuzhat\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43238-024-00118-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Urban heritage is a vital resource that connects communities to their local identity. Unplanned developments and rapid urbanisation often harm the authenticity of historic areas, disrupting the cultural fabric and altering their character. This study introduces the Relative Positive Impact Index (RPII), a novel technique for assessing the socio-cultural impacts of urban revitalisation. The significance of RPII lies in its ability to quantitatively evaluate the impacts on the cultural fabric and integrity of historic urban areas, which is crucial for sustainable urban development. The study’s objective is to apply RPII in evaluating qualitative socio-cultural characteristics in historic urban areas, with a focus on four main criteria and 16 sub-criteria, in the case of the Kuttichira precinct. The methodology integrates the analysis of published literature, a quantitative survey mapping the stakeholders’ perception, and qualitative insights. This approach facilitates an in-depth understanding of how urban revitalisation affects local socio-cultural dynamics, preserving the authenticity and character of historic areas. The study reveals that the revitalisation project in Kuttichira positively impacts the socio-cultural fabric of the area, maintaining cultural integrity and addressing social challenges. These findings offer valuable insights for sustainable urban development and policymaking in historic areas. The study recommends the application of RPII in other urban precincts for comparative analysis and further development of urban development practices, contributing to informed urban policy and planning decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Built Heritage\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Built Heritage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00118-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00118-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市遗产是连接社区与地方特性的重要资源。无规划的开发和快速的城市化往往会损害历史区域的真实性,破坏其文化结构并改变其特征。本研究引入了相对积极影响指数(RPII),这是一种评估城市振兴对社会文化影响的新技术。RPII 的意义在于它能够定量评估对历史城区文化结构和完整性的影响,这对城市的可持续发展至关重要。本研究的目标是应用 RPII 对历史城区的社会文化特征进行定性评估,以库提奇拉街区为例,重点关注 4 项主要标准和 16 项次级标准。该方法综合了对已出版文献的分析、对利益相关者看法的定量调查以及定性见解。这种方法有助于深入了解城市振兴如何影响当地的社会文化动态,以及如何保护历史区域的真实性和特色。研究表明,库蒂奇拉的振兴项目对该地区的社会文化结构产生了积极影响,既保持了文化完整性,又应对了社会挑战。这些发现为历史区域的可持续城市发展和政策制定提供了宝贵的见解。研究建议在其他城市地区应用 RPII 进行比较分析,并进一步发展城市发展实践,为知情的城市政策和规划决策做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the socio-cultural impact of urban revitalisation using Relative Positive Impact Index (RPII)
Urban heritage is a vital resource that connects communities to their local identity. Unplanned developments and rapid urbanisation often harm the authenticity of historic areas, disrupting the cultural fabric and altering their character. This study introduces the Relative Positive Impact Index (RPII), a novel technique for assessing the socio-cultural impacts of urban revitalisation. The significance of RPII lies in its ability to quantitatively evaluate the impacts on the cultural fabric and integrity of historic urban areas, which is crucial for sustainable urban development. The study’s objective is to apply RPII in evaluating qualitative socio-cultural characteristics in historic urban areas, with a focus on four main criteria and 16 sub-criteria, in the case of the Kuttichira precinct. The methodology integrates the analysis of published literature, a quantitative survey mapping the stakeholders’ perception, and qualitative insights. This approach facilitates an in-depth understanding of how urban revitalisation affects local socio-cultural dynamics, preserving the authenticity and character of historic areas. The study reveals that the revitalisation project in Kuttichira positively impacts the socio-cultural fabric of the area, maintaining cultural integrity and addressing social challenges. These findings offer valuable insights for sustainable urban development and policymaking in historic areas. The study recommends the application of RPII in other urban precincts for comparative analysis and further development of urban development practices, contributing to informed urban policy and planning decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Built Heritage
Built Heritage Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Heritage, urban form and spatial resignification in the production of sustainable Olympic legacies: an urban design analysis of the Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games Industrial heritage in the hosting of mega-events: assessing the potential for urban redevelopment and social change? Evolving heritage in modern China: transforming religious sites for preservation and development The sound heritage of Kotagede: the evolving soundscape of a living museum The politics of heritage in a river-city: imperial, hyper-colonial, and globalising Tianjin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1