提出问题:什么是哺乳动物的跨代表观遗传?

IF 2.9 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Epigenetics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1080/15592294.2024.2333586
Hasan Khatib, Jessica Townsend, Melissa A Konkel, Gabi Conidi, Julia A Hasselkus
{"title":"提出问题:什么是哺乳动物的跨代表观遗传?","authors":"Hasan Khatib, Jessica Townsend, Melissa A Konkel, Gabi Conidi, Julia A Hasselkus","doi":"10.1080/15592294.2024.2333586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While transgenerational epigenetic inheritance has been extensively documented in plants, nematodes, and fruit flies, its existence in mammals remains controversial. Several factors have contributed to this debate, including the lack of a clear distinction between intergenerational and transgenerational epigenetic inheritance (TEI), the inconsistency of some studies, the potential confounding effects of in-utero vs. epigenetic factors, and, most importantly, the biological challenge of epigenetic reprogramming. Two waves of epigenetic reprogramming occur: in the primordial germ cells and the developing embryo after fertilization, characterized by global erasure of DNA methylation and remodelling of histone modifications. Consequently, TEI can only occur if specific genetic regions evade this reprogramming and persist through embryonic development. These challenges have revived the long-standing debate about the possibility of inheriting acquired traits, which has been strongly contested since the Lamarckian and Darwinian eras. As a result, coupled with the absence of universally accepted criteria for transgenerational epigenetic studies, a vast body of literature has emerged claiming evidence of TEI. Therefore, the goal of this study is to advocate for establishing fundamental criteria that must be met for a study to qualify as evidence of TEI. We identified five criteria based on the consensus of studies that critically evaluated TEI. To assess whether published original research papers adhere to these criteria, we examined 80 studies that either claimed or were cited as supporting TEI. The findings of this analysis underscore the widespread confusion in this field and highlight the urgent need for a unified scientific consensus on TEI requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":11767,"journal":{"name":"Epigenetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10965103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calling the question: what is mammalian transgenerational epigenetic inheritance?\",\"authors\":\"Hasan Khatib, Jessica Townsend, Melissa A Konkel, Gabi Conidi, Julia A Hasselkus\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15592294.2024.2333586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While transgenerational epigenetic inheritance has been extensively documented in plants, nematodes, and fruit flies, its existence in mammals remains controversial. Several factors have contributed to this debate, including the lack of a clear distinction between intergenerational and transgenerational epigenetic inheritance (TEI), the inconsistency of some studies, the potential confounding effects of in-utero vs. epigenetic factors, and, most importantly, the biological challenge of epigenetic reprogramming. Two waves of epigenetic reprogramming occur: in the primordial germ cells and the developing embryo after fertilization, characterized by global erasure of DNA methylation and remodelling of histone modifications. Consequently, TEI can only occur if specific genetic regions evade this reprogramming and persist through embryonic development. These challenges have revived the long-standing debate about the possibility of inheriting acquired traits, which has been strongly contested since the Lamarckian and Darwinian eras. As a result, coupled with the absence of universally accepted criteria for transgenerational epigenetic studies, a vast body of literature has emerged claiming evidence of TEI. Therefore, the goal of this study is to advocate for establishing fundamental criteria that must be met for a study to qualify as evidence of TEI. We identified five criteria based on the consensus of studies that critically evaluated TEI. To assess whether published original research papers adhere to these criteria, we examined 80 studies that either claimed or were cited as supporting TEI. The findings of this analysis underscore the widespread confusion in this field and highlight the urgent need for a unified scientific consensus on TEI requirements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epigenetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10965103/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epigenetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2024.2333586\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epigenetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2024.2333586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然转代表观遗传在植物、线虫和果蝇中得到了广泛的记录,但其在哺乳动物中的存在仍然存在争议。导致这一争论的因素有很多,包括缺乏对代际遗传和跨代表观遗传(TEI)的明确区分、一些研究的不一致性、胎内因素与表观遗传因素的潜在混杂效应,以及最重要的表观遗传重编程的生物学挑战。表观遗传重编程有两波:原始生殖细胞和受精后发育的胚胎,其特点是 DNA 甲基化的全面清除和组蛋白修饰的重塑。因此,只有当特定基因区域逃避这种重编程并在胚胎发育过程中持续存在时,才能发生 TEI。这些挑战再次引发了关于后天性状遗传可能性的长期争论,这一争论自拉马克和达尔文时代以来就一直存在。因此,加上跨代表观遗传研究缺乏公认的标准,出现了大量声称有 TEI 证据的文献。因此,本研究的目标是倡导建立基本标准,一项研究必须符合这些标准才有资格成为 TEI 的证据。我们根据批判性评估 TEI 的研究共识,确定了五项标准。为了评估已发表的原创研究论文是否符合这些标准,我们研究了 80 项声称或被引用为支持 TEI 的研究。这项分析的结果凸显了该领域普遍存在的混乱现象,并强调了就 TEI 要求达成统一科学共识的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Calling the question: what is mammalian transgenerational epigenetic inheritance?

While transgenerational epigenetic inheritance has been extensively documented in plants, nematodes, and fruit flies, its existence in mammals remains controversial. Several factors have contributed to this debate, including the lack of a clear distinction between intergenerational and transgenerational epigenetic inheritance (TEI), the inconsistency of some studies, the potential confounding effects of in-utero vs. epigenetic factors, and, most importantly, the biological challenge of epigenetic reprogramming. Two waves of epigenetic reprogramming occur: in the primordial germ cells and the developing embryo after fertilization, characterized by global erasure of DNA methylation and remodelling of histone modifications. Consequently, TEI can only occur if specific genetic regions evade this reprogramming and persist through embryonic development. These challenges have revived the long-standing debate about the possibility of inheriting acquired traits, which has been strongly contested since the Lamarckian and Darwinian eras. As a result, coupled with the absence of universally accepted criteria for transgenerational epigenetic studies, a vast body of literature has emerged claiming evidence of TEI. Therefore, the goal of this study is to advocate for establishing fundamental criteria that must be met for a study to qualify as evidence of TEI. We identified five criteria based on the consensus of studies that critically evaluated TEI. To assess whether published original research papers adhere to these criteria, we examined 80 studies that either claimed or were cited as supporting TEI. The findings of this analysis underscore the widespread confusion in this field and highlight the urgent need for a unified scientific consensus on TEI requirements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epigenetics
Epigenetics 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Epigenetics publishes peer-reviewed original research and review articles that provide an unprecedented forum where epigenetic mechanisms and their role in diverse biological processes can be revealed, shared, and discussed. Epigenetics research studies heritable changes in gene expression caused by mechanisms others than the modification of the DNA sequence. Epigenetics therefore plays critical roles in a variety of biological systems, diseases, and disciplines. Topics of interest include (but are not limited to): DNA methylation Nucleosome positioning and modification Gene silencing Imprinting Nuclear reprogramming Chromatin remodeling Non-coding RNA Non-histone chromosomal elements Dosage compensation Nuclear organization Epigenetic therapy and diagnostics Nutrition and environmental epigenetics Cancer epigenetics Neuroepigenetics
期刊最新文献
WGBS of embryonic gonads revealed that long non-coding RNAs in the MHM region might be involved in cell autonomous sex identity and female gonadal development in chickens. Imprinted gene alterations in the kidneys of growth restricted offspring may be mediated by a long non-coding RNA. N6-methyladenosine methylation analysis of long noncoding RNAs and mRNAs in 5-FU-resistant colon cancer cells. History of exposure to copper influences transgenerational gene expression responses in Daphnia magna. Plasma methylated GNB4 and Riplet as a novel dual-marker panel for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1