[波兰语版创伤后应激障碍 PTSD-8 测量问卷在四组医疗专业研究中的应用]。

Medycyna pracy Pub Date : 2024-03-22 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.13075/mp.5893.01465
Joanna Mazur, Alicja Kozakiewicz, Katarzyna Porwit, Zbigniew Izdebski
{"title":"[波兰语版创伤后应激障碍 PTSD-8 测量问卷在四组医疗专业研究中的应用]。","authors":"Joanna Mazur, Alicja Kozakiewicz, Katarzyna Porwit, Zbigniew Izdebski","doi":"10.13075/mp.5893.01465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are several techniques to diagnose post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms that correspond to the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (DSM) classification of mental disorders. This study aimed at testing the reliability and construct validity of the Polish version of the PTSD-8. The results obtained in four professional groups of healthcare workers (physicians, nurses, paramedics, other occupations) were compared.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The PTSD-8 questionnaire includes questions on stress reactions manifested by intrusion (4 items), avoidance (2 items), or hypervigilance (2 items). Respondents were asked about their reactions to the traumatic work-related experiences occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic. The nationwide survey conducted in 2022 included 2303 employees, among whom 746 had such an experience and completed the PTSD-8 questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results, it was shown that a single-factor model is acceptable, but under the condition of modification by correlation of random errors at selected observable variables. The reliability of this scale is very good (McDonald's Ω = 0.890), and the goodness-of-fit of the overall CFA model is confirmed by: CMIN/DF = 3.969, NFI = 0.982, RFI = 0.964, IFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.983, RMSEA = 0.063. The model estimated for female nurses has the best psychometric properties. In the study group of 2303 respondents, 16.76% met the criteria for PTSD, accounting for 52.74% of those who were traumatized by a work-related event. The PTSD-8 index is M±SD 20.01±5.55 pts (range: 8-32 pts). The PTSD-8 index is significantly higher in women than in men, and higher in nurses compared to other professions. However, the differences between professional groups are significant only for women, and the largest when comparing female physicians and nurses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analyses confirmed the rationale of further implementation of the PTSD-8 questionnaire in Poland, both as a tool for identifying PTSD and for studying the severity of the syndrome, its determinants and health effects. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2024;75(1):45-56.</p>","PeriodicalId":101460,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna pracy","volume":"75 1","pages":"45-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Polish version of the questionnaire for measuring post-traumatic stress disorders PTSD-8 in studies of four groups of medical professions].\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Mazur, Alicja Kozakiewicz, Katarzyna Porwit, Zbigniew Izdebski\",\"doi\":\"10.13075/mp.5893.01465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are several techniques to diagnose post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms that correspond to the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (DSM) classification of mental disorders. This study aimed at testing the reliability and construct validity of the Polish version of the PTSD-8. The results obtained in four professional groups of healthcare workers (physicians, nurses, paramedics, other occupations) were compared.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The PTSD-8 questionnaire includes questions on stress reactions manifested by intrusion (4 items), avoidance (2 items), or hypervigilance (2 items). Respondents were asked about their reactions to the traumatic work-related experiences occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic. The nationwide survey conducted in 2022 included 2303 employees, among whom 746 had such an experience and completed the PTSD-8 questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results, it was shown that a single-factor model is acceptable, but under the condition of modification by correlation of random errors at selected observable variables. The reliability of this scale is very good (McDonald's Ω = 0.890), and the goodness-of-fit of the overall CFA model is confirmed by: CMIN/DF = 3.969, NFI = 0.982, RFI = 0.964, IFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.983, RMSEA = 0.063. The model estimated for female nurses has the best psychometric properties. In the study group of 2303 respondents, 16.76% met the criteria for PTSD, accounting for 52.74% of those who were traumatized by a work-related event. The PTSD-8 index is M±SD 20.01±5.55 pts (range: 8-32 pts). The PTSD-8 index is significantly higher in women than in men, and higher in nurses compared to other professions. However, the differences between professional groups are significant only for women, and the largest when comparing female physicians and nurses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analyses confirmed the rationale of further implementation of the PTSD-8 questionnaire in Poland, both as a tool for identifying PTSD and for studying the severity of the syndrome, its determinants and health effects. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2024;75(1):45-56.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medycyna pracy\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"45-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medycyna pracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.01465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna pracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.01465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有几种诊断创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的技术与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)的精神疾病分类相一致。本研究旨在测试波兰语版 PTSD-8 的可靠性和结构有效性。研究比较了四个医护人员专业组(医生、护士、护理人员、其他职业)的调查结果:创伤后应激障碍-8 "调查问卷包括以入侵(4 个项目)、回避(2 个项目)或过度警觉(2 个项目)为表现形式的应激反应问题。受访者被问及他们对 COVID-19 大流行期间发生的与工作相关的创伤性经历的反应。2022 年进行的全国性调查包括 2303 名员工,其中 746 人有过此类经历并填写了 PTSD-8 问卷:根据确认性因素分析(CFA)的结果,单因素模型是可以接受的,但条件是所选可观测变量的随机误差的相关性。该量表的信度非常好(麦克唐纳Ω = 0.890),整个 CFA 模型的拟合优度由以下几点得到证实:cmin/df = 3.969,nfi = 0.982,rfi = 0.964,ifi = 0.986,tli = 0.983,rmsea = 0.063。为女护士估算的模型具有最好的心理测量特性。在 2303 名受访者中,有 16.76% 符合创伤后应激障碍的标准,占因工作相关事件而受到创伤者的 52.74%。PTSD-8 指数为 M±SD 20.01±5.55 pts(范围:8-32 pts)。女性的 PTSD-8 指数明显高于男性,护士的 PTSD-8 指数也高于其他职业。然而,不同职业群体之间的差异仅对女性有显著影响,而女医生和女护士之间的差异最大:分析结果证实了在波兰进一步实施 PTSD-8 问卷的合理性,该问卷既可作为识别创伤后应激障碍的工具,也可用于研究该综合征的严重程度、其决定因素和对健康的影响。Med Pr Work Health Saf.2024;75(1):45-56.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Polish version of the questionnaire for measuring post-traumatic stress disorders PTSD-8 in studies of four groups of medical professions].

Background: There are several techniques to diagnose post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms that correspond to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) classification of mental disorders. This study aimed at testing the reliability and construct validity of the Polish version of the PTSD-8. The results obtained in four professional groups of healthcare workers (physicians, nurses, paramedics, other occupations) were compared.

Material and methods: The PTSD-8 questionnaire includes questions on stress reactions manifested by intrusion (4 items), avoidance (2 items), or hypervigilance (2 items). Respondents were asked about their reactions to the traumatic work-related experiences occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic. The nationwide survey conducted in 2022 included 2303 employees, among whom 746 had such an experience and completed the PTSD-8 questionnaire.

Results: Based on confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results, it was shown that a single-factor model is acceptable, but under the condition of modification by correlation of random errors at selected observable variables. The reliability of this scale is very good (McDonald's Ω = 0.890), and the goodness-of-fit of the overall CFA model is confirmed by: CMIN/DF = 3.969, NFI = 0.982, RFI = 0.964, IFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.983, RMSEA = 0.063. The model estimated for female nurses has the best psychometric properties. In the study group of 2303 respondents, 16.76% met the criteria for PTSD, accounting for 52.74% of those who were traumatized by a work-related event. The PTSD-8 index is M±SD 20.01±5.55 pts (range: 8-32 pts). The PTSD-8 index is significantly higher in women than in men, and higher in nurses compared to other professions. However, the differences between professional groups are significant only for women, and the largest when comparing female physicians and nurses.

Conclusions: The analyses confirmed the rationale of further implementation of the PTSD-8 questionnaire in Poland, both as a tool for identifying PTSD and for studying the severity of the syndrome, its determinants and health effects. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2024;75(1):45-56.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Occupational anaphylaxis to food. [The changing epidemiology of tick-borne encephalitis: epidemic surveillance and disease prevention challenges]. [Exposure to bioaerosol in the residential environment]. [Assessment of the importance of teleradiology services in the opinion of electroradiologists in Poland]. [Breast cancer under control - risk calculators].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1