叶马语相对从句中的主语和非主语协议

Mitike Asrat
{"title":"叶马语相对从句中的主语和非主语协议","authors":"Mitike Asrat","doi":"10.22363/2521-442x-2024-8-1-115-126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to elucidate the subject and non-subject agreement mechanisms within Yemsa relative clauses, an area not comprehensively covered by existing research. By analysing these agreement forms, the study seeks to bridge the identified gap in the understanding of Yemsa’s syntactic structures. The research questions guiding this study focus on the mechanisms through which subject agreements are manifested in Yemsa's relative clauses and the morphological markers they employ, alongside an examination of how non-subject agreements within these clauses diverge from subject agreements. The data were collected through the elicitation technique through informant interviews about subject and non-subject agreements in the Yemsa relative clauses. The data were analysed using a descriptive approach. The person-marker inventories are suffixes. Siewierska’s Prominence Hierarchy works in Yemsa. The order of the suffixes is modifier > head. Person markers simultaneously indicate masculine and feminine referents and numbers. Siewierska’s Predicate Hierarchy works on Yemsa. The suffix element -nà appears in the relative verbs. The word order in the relative clause is (O)VS. The nominative case is unmarked, whereas the accusative case is marked. The subject argument is expressed in the same manner as an independent clause. The description of the subject and the non-subject agreement in the Yemsa relative clauses has significant implications for developing the general features of Omotic and Afroasiatic languages. The study will serve as an input for the preparation of pedagogical materials in the language.","PeriodicalId":36167,"journal":{"name":"Training, Language and Culture","volume":" 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The subject and non-subject agreements in the Yemsa relative clauses\",\"authors\":\"Mitike Asrat\",\"doi\":\"10.22363/2521-442x-2024-8-1-115-126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to elucidate the subject and non-subject agreement mechanisms within Yemsa relative clauses, an area not comprehensively covered by existing research. By analysing these agreement forms, the study seeks to bridge the identified gap in the understanding of Yemsa’s syntactic structures. The research questions guiding this study focus on the mechanisms through which subject agreements are manifested in Yemsa's relative clauses and the morphological markers they employ, alongside an examination of how non-subject agreements within these clauses diverge from subject agreements. The data were collected through the elicitation technique through informant interviews about subject and non-subject agreements in the Yemsa relative clauses. The data were analysed using a descriptive approach. The person-marker inventories are suffixes. Siewierska’s Prominence Hierarchy works in Yemsa. The order of the suffixes is modifier > head. Person markers simultaneously indicate masculine and feminine referents and numbers. Siewierska’s Predicate Hierarchy works on Yemsa. The suffix element -nà appears in the relative verbs. The word order in the relative clause is (O)VS. The nominative case is unmarked, whereas the accusative case is marked. The subject argument is expressed in the same manner as an independent clause. The description of the subject and the non-subject agreement in the Yemsa relative clauses has significant implications for developing the general features of Omotic and Afroasiatic languages. The study will serve as an input for the preparation of pedagogical materials in the language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Training, Language and Culture\",\"volume\":\" 38\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Training, Language and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442x-2024-8-1-115-126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Training, Language and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442x-2024-8-1-115-126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在阐明叶姆萨语相对从句中的主语和非主语一致机制,这是一个现有研究尚未全面覆盖的领域。通过分析这些协议形式,本研究试图弥补在理解叶姆萨句法结构方面发现的差距。指导本研究的研究问题主要集中在叶马语相对从句中主语一致的表现机制及其使用的形态标记,同时还考察了这些从句中的非主语一致与主语一致之间的差异。研究采用诱导技术,通过对信息提供者进行访谈,收集有关叶姆萨语相对从句中主语和非主语协议的数据。数据采用描述性方法进行分析。人称标记清单是后缀。Siewierska's Prominence Hierarchy 在 Yemsa 中起作用。后缀的顺序是修饰语 > 头。人称标记同时表示阳性和阴性指代物和数字。Siewierska 的 "谓词层次结构 "在叶姆萨语中有效。后缀元素 -nà 出现在相对动词中。相对从句的词序是 (O)VS。名词性态是无标记的,而指称性态是有标记的。主语分论点的表达方式与独立分句相同。对 Yemsa 语相对从句中主语和非主语一致的描述对发展 Omotic 和 Afroasiatic 语言的一般特征具有重要意义。这项研究将为编写该语言的教学材料提供素材。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The subject and non-subject agreements in the Yemsa relative clauses
This study aims to elucidate the subject and non-subject agreement mechanisms within Yemsa relative clauses, an area not comprehensively covered by existing research. By analysing these agreement forms, the study seeks to bridge the identified gap in the understanding of Yemsa’s syntactic structures. The research questions guiding this study focus on the mechanisms through which subject agreements are manifested in Yemsa's relative clauses and the morphological markers they employ, alongside an examination of how non-subject agreements within these clauses diverge from subject agreements. The data were collected through the elicitation technique through informant interviews about subject and non-subject agreements in the Yemsa relative clauses. The data were analysed using a descriptive approach. The person-marker inventories are suffixes. Siewierska’s Prominence Hierarchy works in Yemsa. The order of the suffixes is modifier > head. Person markers simultaneously indicate masculine and feminine referents and numbers. Siewierska’s Predicate Hierarchy works on Yemsa. The suffix element -nà appears in the relative verbs. The word order in the relative clause is (O)VS. The nominative case is unmarked, whereas the accusative case is marked. The subject argument is expressed in the same manner as an independent clause. The description of the subject and the non-subject agreement in the Yemsa relative clauses has significant implications for developing the general features of Omotic and Afroasiatic languages. The study will serve as an input for the preparation of pedagogical materials in the language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Training, Language and Culture
Training, Language and Culture Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Code switching patterns in Kazakh-Russian hybrid language practice: An empirical study Hikikomori and Sōshokukei-danshi: A semantic analysis of Japan’s social deviants Russian culture through the prism of English, Finnish and Japanese languages: Reflections or refractions? Empirical application of sentiment analysis and emotions in Spanish: A post-cognitivist approach French medical memes: Themes, language, functions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1