关节镜下 Bankart 与开放式 Latarjet;复发性肩关节前脱位患者的中短期复发结果和患者自述结果

SurgiColl Pub Date : 2024-03-23 DOI:10.58616/001c.90553
Kassem Ghayyad, Peyman Mirghaderi, Meysam Akbarzadeh, Maryam Salami, M. Ebrahimzadeh, Amir Kachooei
{"title":"关节镜下 Bankart 与开放式 Latarjet;复发性肩关节前脱位患者的中短期复发结果和患者自述结果","authors":"Kassem Ghayyad, Peyman Mirghaderi, Meysam Akbarzadeh, Maryam Salami, M. Ebrahimzadeh, Amir Kachooei","doi":"10.58616/001c.90553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This retrospective comparative study compared the short to mid-term outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet procedures in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Patients who underwent either arthroscopic Bankart repair or open Latarjet procedures between 2008 and 2020, with at least one year of follow-up, were included. Arthroscopic Bankart repairs were performed on shoulders with minimal glenoid bone loss (<15%), and the Latarjet procedure was performed if the preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan showed a 15% bone loss on the glenoid side or 30-40% humeral head bone loss. Their surgery results and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). 133 patients were analyzed in Latarjet (n = 67) and Bankart groups (n = 66). Before surgery, the two groups of patients were similar regarding surgery side, hand dominance, education level, occupation difficulty level, and smoking (P>0.05). However, Latarjet’s patients were younger (32 vs. 35, P=0.04), had a higher proportion of males (96% vs. 82%, P=0.01), and had a significantly shorter follow-up period (3.2 vs. 6.4 years, P<0.001) than the Bankart group. There was no significant difference between the Latarjet and Bankart groups regarding the follow-up’s OSS score (37 vs. 36; P=0.94) and SPADI score (22 vs. 24, P=0.80). Dislocation was observed in only one patient (1.5%) in the Latarjet group (P=1.0). Subluxation was observed in 5 patients (7.5%) of the Latarjet group and three patients (4.5%) of the Bankart group (P=0.4). The overall instability rate was similar (P>0.05). Our findings suggest that both arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet are reliable techniques in short to mid-term follow-up based on the glenoid bone loss cut-off of 15%. Therapeutic Level III","PeriodicalId":512202,"journal":{"name":"SurgiColl","volume":" 58","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arthroscopic Bankart versus Open Latarjet; Short-to-Mid-Term Outcomes of Recurrence and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation\",\"authors\":\"Kassem Ghayyad, Peyman Mirghaderi, Meysam Akbarzadeh, Maryam Salami, M. Ebrahimzadeh, Amir Kachooei\",\"doi\":\"10.58616/001c.90553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This retrospective comparative study compared the short to mid-term outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet procedures in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Patients who underwent either arthroscopic Bankart repair or open Latarjet procedures between 2008 and 2020, with at least one year of follow-up, were included. Arthroscopic Bankart repairs were performed on shoulders with minimal glenoid bone loss (<15%), and the Latarjet procedure was performed if the preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan showed a 15% bone loss on the glenoid side or 30-40% humeral head bone loss. Their surgery results and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). 133 patients were analyzed in Latarjet (n = 67) and Bankart groups (n = 66). Before surgery, the two groups of patients were similar regarding surgery side, hand dominance, education level, occupation difficulty level, and smoking (P>0.05). However, Latarjet’s patients were younger (32 vs. 35, P=0.04), had a higher proportion of males (96% vs. 82%, P=0.01), and had a significantly shorter follow-up period (3.2 vs. 6.4 years, P<0.001) than the Bankart group. There was no significant difference between the Latarjet and Bankart groups regarding the follow-up’s OSS score (37 vs. 36; P=0.94) and SPADI score (22 vs. 24, P=0.80). Dislocation was observed in only one patient (1.5%) in the Latarjet group (P=1.0). Subluxation was observed in 5 patients (7.5%) of the Latarjet group and three patients (4.5%) of the Bankart group (P=0.4). The overall instability rate was similar (P>0.05). Our findings suggest that both arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet are reliable techniques in short to mid-term follow-up based on the glenoid bone loss cut-off of 15%. Therapeutic Level III\",\"PeriodicalId\":512202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SurgiColl\",\"volume\":\" 58\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SurgiColl\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58616/001c.90553\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SurgiColl","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58616/001c.90553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项回顾性比较研究比较了关节镜下Bankart修复术和开放式Latarjet手术对复发性肩关节前方不稳定患者的中短期疗效。研究纳入了2008年至2020年间接受关节镜下Bankart修复术或开放式Latarjet手术的患者,这些患者至少接受了一年的随访。接受关节镜Bankart修复术的患者肩关节盂骨损失极小(0.05)。然而,Latarjet 的患者更年轻(32 岁对 35 岁,P=0.04),男性比例更高(96% 对 82%,P=0.01),随访时间明显更短(3.2 年对 6.4 年,P0.05)。我们的研究结果表明,在中短期随访中,关节镜下Bankart修复术和开放式Latarjet都是可靠的技术,以盂骨丢失15%为临界值。三级治疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Arthroscopic Bankart versus Open Latarjet; Short-to-Mid-Term Outcomes of Recurrence and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation
This retrospective comparative study compared the short to mid-term outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet procedures in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Patients who underwent either arthroscopic Bankart repair or open Latarjet procedures between 2008 and 2020, with at least one year of follow-up, were included. Arthroscopic Bankart repairs were performed on shoulders with minimal glenoid bone loss (<15%), and the Latarjet procedure was performed if the preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan showed a 15% bone loss on the glenoid side or 30-40% humeral head bone loss. Their surgery results and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). 133 patients were analyzed in Latarjet (n = 67) and Bankart groups (n = 66). Before surgery, the two groups of patients were similar regarding surgery side, hand dominance, education level, occupation difficulty level, and smoking (P>0.05). However, Latarjet’s patients were younger (32 vs. 35, P=0.04), had a higher proportion of males (96% vs. 82%, P=0.01), and had a significantly shorter follow-up period (3.2 vs. 6.4 years, P<0.001) than the Bankart group. There was no significant difference between the Latarjet and Bankart groups regarding the follow-up’s OSS score (37 vs. 36; P=0.94) and SPADI score (22 vs. 24, P=0.80). Dislocation was observed in only one patient (1.5%) in the Latarjet group (P=1.0). Subluxation was observed in 5 patients (7.5%) of the Latarjet group and three patients (4.5%) of the Bankart group (P=0.4). The overall instability rate was similar (P>0.05). Our findings suggest that both arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet are reliable techniques in short to mid-term follow-up based on the glenoid bone loss cut-off of 15%. Therapeutic Level III
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Closed Midsubstance Rupture of the Biceps Brachii and Brachialis: A Case Report Recent developments on cells involved in bone repair and their potential clinical applications Periarticular Injections with Liposomal Bupivacaine in Comparison with Traditional (Bupivacaine/Ropivacaine) Periarticular Injections in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Arthroscopic Bankart versus Open Latarjet; Short-to-Mid-Term Outcomes of Recurrence and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation Below Elbow Amputation Due to Ischemic Complications after Radial Artery Cannulation: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1