T. T. Hoang, J. Reid, C. Galorport, Brian Bressler, Y. Leung, G. Rosenfeld
{"title":"加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省在炎症性肠病治疗中强制将英夫利西单抗转为生物仿制药的结果","authors":"T. T. Hoang, J. Reid, C. Galorport, Brian Bressler, Y. Leung, G. Rosenfeld","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwae011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Despite infliximab biosimilars becoming widely used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, real-world non-medical switching is sparse. A biosimilar non-medical switch was launched in British Columbia in 2019, the first Canadian province to do so, from Remicade to an approved biosimilar (CT-P13 or SB2).\n \n \n \n This study aims to obtain real-world evidence evaluating the clinical outcomes of non-medical switching from Remicade to the infliximab biosimilars.\n \n \n \n This is a retrospective observational study of stable IBD patients from the IBD Centre of BC who underwent the non-medical infliximab switch. The primary outcome is treatment continuation at 12 ± 2 months post-switch. Secondary outcomes include frequency of loss of response, adverse events, and immunogenicity within the first 12 months post-switch. A control group of patients maintained on the originator served as a comparison.\n \n \n \n Patients in the biosimilar switch group (n = 264) and originator group (n = 99), show similar demographics and disease characteristics. There was no difference in infliximab continuation between the biosimilar group (94.9%) and the originator group (90.1%) (P = 0.18). Reasons for discontinuation of infliximab included loss of response (4.04% vs 4.91%), immunogenicity (1.01% vs 0.75%), or adverse effect (1.01% vs 2.3%) in the infliximab originator vs biosimilar switch group, respectively. Similarly, no differences in safety or efficacy were observed between patients switched to CT-P13 or SB2.\n \n \n \n Non-medical biosimilar switch of infliximab demonstrates similar clinical outcomes compared to originator molecule continuation for therapy of IBD. These data support the safety and efficacy of non-medical infliximab switching in IBD patients.\n","PeriodicalId":17263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of a mandatory non-medical switch of infliximab to a biosimilar for inflammatory bowel disease in British Columbia, Canada\",\"authors\":\"T. T. Hoang, J. Reid, C. Galorport, Brian Bressler, Y. Leung, G. Rosenfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jcag/gwae011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Despite infliximab biosimilars becoming widely used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, real-world non-medical switching is sparse. A biosimilar non-medical switch was launched in British Columbia in 2019, the first Canadian province to do so, from Remicade to an approved biosimilar (CT-P13 or SB2).\\n \\n \\n \\n This study aims to obtain real-world evidence evaluating the clinical outcomes of non-medical switching from Remicade to the infliximab biosimilars.\\n \\n \\n \\n This is a retrospective observational study of stable IBD patients from the IBD Centre of BC who underwent the non-medical infliximab switch. The primary outcome is treatment continuation at 12 ± 2 months post-switch. Secondary outcomes include frequency of loss of response, adverse events, and immunogenicity within the first 12 months post-switch. A control group of patients maintained on the originator served as a comparison.\\n \\n \\n \\n Patients in the biosimilar switch group (n = 264) and originator group (n = 99), show similar demographics and disease characteristics. There was no difference in infliximab continuation between the biosimilar group (94.9%) and the originator group (90.1%) (P = 0.18). Reasons for discontinuation of infliximab included loss of response (4.04% vs 4.91%), immunogenicity (1.01% vs 0.75%), or adverse effect (1.01% vs 2.3%) in the infliximab originator vs biosimilar switch group, respectively. Similarly, no differences in safety or efficacy were observed between patients switched to CT-P13 or SB2.\\n \\n \\n \\n Non-medical biosimilar switch of infliximab demonstrates similar clinical outcomes compared to originator molecule continuation for therapy of IBD. These data support the safety and efficacy of non-medical infliximab switching in IBD patients.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":17263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwae011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwae011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of a mandatory non-medical switch of infliximab to a biosimilar for inflammatory bowel disease in British Columbia, Canada
Despite infliximab biosimilars becoming widely used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, real-world non-medical switching is sparse. A biosimilar non-medical switch was launched in British Columbia in 2019, the first Canadian province to do so, from Remicade to an approved biosimilar (CT-P13 or SB2).
This study aims to obtain real-world evidence evaluating the clinical outcomes of non-medical switching from Remicade to the infliximab biosimilars.
This is a retrospective observational study of stable IBD patients from the IBD Centre of BC who underwent the non-medical infliximab switch. The primary outcome is treatment continuation at 12 ± 2 months post-switch. Secondary outcomes include frequency of loss of response, adverse events, and immunogenicity within the first 12 months post-switch. A control group of patients maintained on the originator served as a comparison.
Patients in the biosimilar switch group (n = 264) and originator group (n = 99), show similar demographics and disease characteristics. There was no difference in infliximab continuation between the biosimilar group (94.9%) and the originator group (90.1%) (P = 0.18). Reasons for discontinuation of infliximab included loss of response (4.04% vs 4.91%), immunogenicity (1.01% vs 0.75%), or adverse effect (1.01% vs 2.3%) in the infliximab originator vs biosimilar switch group, respectively. Similarly, no differences in safety or efficacy were observed between patients switched to CT-P13 or SB2.
Non-medical biosimilar switch of infliximab demonstrates similar clinical outcomes compared to originator molecule continuation for therapy of IBD. These data support the safety and efficacy of non-medical infliximab switching in IBD patients.