孕中期以后的腰痛与孕前母亲体育锻炼的关系:一项横断面研究

Rarinthip Boonpradit, Wanpanithan Sudsaneha, K. Khuancharee, K. Raungrongmorakot
{"title":"孕中期以后的腰痛与孕前母亲体育锻炼的关系:一项横断面研究","authors":"Rarinthip Boonpradit, Wanpanithan Sudsaneha, K. Khuancharee, K. Raungrongmorakot","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.20241047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: 1) To compare the proportions of low back pain (LBP) in pregnant women with adequate and inadequate physical activity (APA and IPA, respectively) prior to pregnancy. 2) To identify possible factors associated with LBP during pregnancy. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional analytic study was conducted. Pregnant women answered questions about their physical activity prior to and during pregnancy, using the Thai version of the short International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and assessed their lower back pain via the visual analog scale and the Thai version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: A total of 342 pregnant women were enrolled. APA and IPA prior to pregnancy were detected in 172 and 170 cases, respectively. The proportions of LBP during pregnancy in each group were 61.6% and 64.7%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (p-value=0.555). When adjusted with multiple factors in logistic regression model, APA prior to pregnancy decreased the risk of LBP during pregnancy (p-value=0.02), with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95% CI) of 0.51 (0.281–0.916). In contrast, APA during pregnancy (p-value=0.01), pelvic pain (p-value<0.001), and LBP in a previous pregnancy (p-value<0.001) increased the risk of LBP during pregnancy, with aORs (95% CI) of 2.53 (1.236–5.197), 4.83 (2.563–9.110), and 7.49 (3.390–16.570), respectively. Conclusion: APA prior to pregnancy and limiting some types of activity during pregnancy may have a protective effect on LBP during pregnancy.","PeriodicalId":36211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Low Back Pain Beyond Mid-Pregnancy with Maternal Physical Activity Prior to Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Rarinthip Boonpradit, Wanpanithan Sudsaneha, K. Khuancharee, K. Raungrongmorakot\",\"doi\":\"10.31584/jhsmr.20241047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: 1) To compare the proportions of low back pain (LBP) in pregnant women with adequate and inadequate physical activity (APA and IPA, respectively) prior to pregnancy. 2) To identify possible factors associated with LBP during pregnancy. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional analytic study was conducted. Pregnant women answered questions about their physical activity prior to and during pregnancy, using the Thai version of the short International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and assessed their lower back pain via the visual analog scale and the Thai version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: A total of 342 pregnant women were enrolled. APA and IPA prior to pregnancy were detected in 172 and 170 cases, respectively. The proportions of LBP during pregnancy in each group were 61.6% and 64.7%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (p-value=0.555). When adjusted with multiple factors in logistic regression model, APA prior to pregnancy decreased the risk of LBP during pregnancy (p-value=0.02), with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95% CI) of 0.51 (0.281–0.916). In contrast, APA during pregnancy (p-value=0.01), pelvic pain (p-value<0.001), and LBP in a previous pregnancy (p-value<0.001) increased the risk of LBP during pregnancy, with aORs (95% CI) of 2.53 (1.236–5.197), 4.83 (2.563–9.110), and 7.49 (3.390–16.570), respectively. Conclusion: APA prior to pregnancy and limiting some types of activity during pregnancy may have a protective effect on LBP during pregnancy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:1)比较怀孕前体力活动充足和体力活动不足(分别为 APA 和 IPA)的孕妇的腰背痛比例。2)确定与孕期腰背痛相关的可能因素。材料与方法:进行了一项横断面分析研究。孕妇使用泰语版的简短国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)回答了有关孕前和孕期体力活动的问题,并通过视觉模拟量表和泰语版的奥斯韦特里残疾指数(ODI)评估了她们的下背痛情况。结果共有 342 名孕妇参加了此次研究。分别有 172 例和 170 例孕妇在怀孕前发现了 APA 和 IPA。两组孕妇在怀孕期间患腰背痛的比例分别为 61.6% 和 64.7%。两组之间没有发现明显的统计学差异(P 值=0.555)。在逻辑回归模型中对多种因素进行调整后,孕前 APA 降低了孕期枸杞痛的风险(p 值=0.02),调整后的几率比(aOR)(95% CI)为 0.51(0.281-0.916)。相反,妊娠期 APA(p-value=0.01)、骨盆疼痛(p-value<0.001)和前次妊娠枸杞痛(p-value<0.001)会增加妊娠期枸杞痛的风险,其 aOR(95% CI)分别为 2.53(1.236-5.197)、4.83(2.563-9.110)和 7.49(3.390-16.570)。结论孕前进行 APA 并在孕期限制某些类型的活动可能对孕期腰痛有保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of Low Back Pain Beyond Mid-Pregnancy with Maternal Physical Activity Prior to Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study
Objective: 1) To compare the proportions of low back pain (LBP) in pregnant women with adequate and inadequate physical activity (APA and IPA, respectively) prior to pregnancy. 2) To identify possible factors associated with LBP during pregnancy. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional analytic study was conducted. Pregnant women answered questions about their physical activity prior to and during pregnancy, using the Thai version of the short International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and assessed their lower back pain via the visual analog scale and the Thai version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: A total of 342 pregnant women were enrolled. APA and IPA prior to pregnancy were detected in 172 and 170 cases, respectively. The proportions of LBP during pregnancy in each group were 61.6% and 64.7%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (p-value=0.555). When adjusted with multiple factors in logistic regression model, APA prior to pregnancy decreased the risk of LBP during pregnancy (p-value=0.02), with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95% CI) of 0.51 (0.281–0.916). In contrast, APA during pregnancy (p-value=0.01), pelvic pain (p-value<0.001), and LBP in a previous pregnancy (p-value<0.001) increased the risk of LBP during pregnancy, with aORs (95% CI) of 2.53 (1.236–5.197), 4.83 (2.563–9.110), and 7.49 (3.390–16.570), respectively. Conclusion: APA prior to pregnancy and limiting some types of activity during pregnancy may have a protective effect on LBP during pregnancy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hospital Food Waste Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Effectiveness of a Patient-Family-Shared Care Program on Delaying the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study Association between Retinal Morphology and Visual Functions in Eyes with Typical Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration: A Pilot Study Association of Online Learning Tools and Students’ Health: A Case Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic Comparative Efficacy of Oxitard Capsules and Immusante Tablets in Early Stages of Oral Submucous Fibrosis - A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1