联合生产中的劳动力价值和生产价格

Georg Stamatis
{"title":"联合生产中的劳动力价值和生产价格","authors":"Georg Stamatis","doi":"10.1177/00194662241235500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we show that in joint production, both labour values and production prices are positive but not unambiguously determined. Usually, the former is determined under the implicit presupposition that labour productivity in the production of each commodity is the same in all production processes that produce this commodity, and the latter is determined under the indirect presupposition that the capital productivity in the production of each commodity is the same in all production processes, with the consequence that this also applies to the maximum profit rate. This presupposition is equivalent to a transformation of joint into single production—not in the ‘space’ of material quantities but in that of corresponding nominal quantities in terms of labour values or production prices, respectively. The same presupposition is not only arbitrary but also, in the case of separable technique, contradicts the technical data of the given production technique. The same applies to the above transformation of joint into simple production, which is made possible under this presupposition. Consequently, either no theory of joint production based on nominal quantities is possible, or, when it is possible, it is based on an arbitrary and, in some cases, contradictory presupposition. JEL Codes: B50, B51, B59","PeriodicalId":509033,"journal":{"name":"The Indian Economic Journal","volume":" 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Labour Values and Production Prices \\u2028in Joint Production\",\"authors\":\"Georg Stamatis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00194662241235500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we show that in joint production, both labour values and production prices are positive but not unambiguously determined. Usually, the former is determined under the implicit presupposition that labour productivity in the production of each commodity is the same in all production processes that produce this commodity, and the latter is determined under the indirect presupposition that the capital productivity in the production of each commodity is the same in all production processes, with the consequence that this also applies to the maximum profit rate. This presupposition is equivalent to a transformation of joint into single production—not in the ‘space’ of material quantities but in that of corresponding nominal quantities in terms of labour values or production prices, respectively. The same presupposition is not only arbitrary but also, in the case of separable technique, contradicts the technical data of the given production technique. The same applies to the above transformation of joint into simple production, which is made possible under this presupposition. Consequently, either no theory of joint production based on nominal quantities is possible, or, when it is possible, it is based on an arbitrary and, in some cases, contradictory presupposition. JEL Codes: B50, B51, B59\",\"PeriodicalId\":509033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Indian Economic Journal\",\"volume\":\" 31\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Indian Economic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662241235500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662241235500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们将说明在联合生产中,劳动价值和生产价格都是正值,但并不是明确确定的。通常,前者是在生产每种商品的劳动生产率在生产该商品的所有生产过程中都相同这一隐含前提下确定的,而后者是在生产每种商品的资本生产率在所有生产过程中都相同这一间接前提下确定的,其结果也适用于最高利润率。这一预设等同于把联合生产转化为单一生产--不是在物质数量的 "空间 "中,而是在分别以劳动价值或生产价格表示的相应名义数量的 "空间 "中。同样的预设不仅是任意的,而且在可分离技术的情况下,还与特定生产技术的技术数据相矛盾。上述把联合生产转化为简单生产的情况也是如此,这种转化是在这种预设条件下实现的。因此,要么不可能有以名义数量为基础的联合生产理论,要么即使有可能,它也是以任意的、在某些情况下是相互矛盾的预设为基础的。JEL Codes:B50, B51, B59
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Labour Values and Production Prices 
in Joint Production
In this article, we show that in joint production, both labour values and production prices are positive but not unambiguously determined. Usually, the former is determined under the implicit presupposition that labour productivity in the production of each commodity is the same in all production processes that produce this commodity, and the latter is determined under the indirect presupposition that the capital productivity in the production of each commodity is the same in all production processes, with the consequence that this also applies to the maximum profit rate. This presupposition is equivalent to a transformation of joint into single production—not in the ‘space’ of material quantities but in that of corresponding nominal quantities in terms of labour values or production prices, respectively. The same presupposition is not only arbitrary but also, in the case of separable technique, contradicts the technical data of the given production technique. The same applies to the above transformation of joint into simple production, which is made possible under this presupposition. Consequently, either no theory of joint production based on nominal quantities is possible, or, when it is possible, it is based on an arbitrary and, in some cases, contradictory presupposition. JEL Codes: B50, B51, B59
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ICT Diffusion, Trade Openness and Growth: Empirical Evidence from Asian Countries Making Global Pharma Supply Chain Resilient: Will the PLI Scheme of India make it a Reliable Alternative to China for the Supply of APIs? Technology Intensification and 
Farmers’ Welfare: A Case 
Study from Karnataka, 
a Semi-arid State of India International Remittances and Household Expenditure Patterns in Bangladesh Political Economy of Fertiliser Use in Agriculture: A Study of Two Districts of West Bengal*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1