{"title":"COVID-19 和澳大利亚私人医疗保险基金的效率、技术和生产力变化*","authors":"Andrew C. Worthington, Lan Nguyen","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We calculate efficiency change, technological progress and productivity growth in Australian private health insurance (PHI) funds using Malmquist indices from 2016/2017 to 2021/2022. Starting in January 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic and the various policy responses to it brought significant disruption to the PHI industry with restrictions placed on elective surgery, and hence insured hospital days, and the use of extras cover for dental, physiotherapy, optical and other services. Lockdowns also saw PHI funds implement work-from-home arrangements and invest to improve policyholder services; the share of Australians with PHI cover grew counter to trend; global financial markets experienced significant volatility, impacting PHI investment revenue and PHI funds delayed even refunded premiums to offset financial pressures on policyholders. We show that productivity declined during the first 18 months of the pandemic and then grew very strongly. We also find the typical PHI fund is 36.5% more productive at the end of the period than the beginning, with most gains being technological (38.3%), involving a large upward shift in the industry frontier, countering much smaller losses from scale (−0.2%) and pure technical (−1.1%) inefficiency. This suggests that the PHI industry responded well to the disruption associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":45208,"journal":{"name":"Economic Papers","volume":"43 2","pages":"169-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1759-3441.12412","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 and Efficiency, Technology and Productivity Change in Australian Private Health Insurance Funds*\",\"authors\":\"Andrew C. Worthington, Lan Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1759-3441.12412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We calculate efficiency change, technological progress and productivity growth in Australian private health insurance (PHI) funds using Malmquist indices from 2016/2017 to 2021/2022. Starting in January 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic and the various policy responses to it brought significant disruption to the PHI industry with restrictions placed on elective surgery, and hence insured hospital days, and the use of extras cover for dental, physiotherapy, optical and other services. Lockdowns also saw PHI funds implement work-from-home arrangements and invest to improve policyholder services; the share of Australians with PHI cover grew counter to trend; global financial markets experienced significant volatility, impacting PHI investment revenue and PHI funds delayed even refunded premiums to offset financial pressures on policyholders. We show that productivity declined during the first 18 months of the pandemic and then grew very strongly. We also find the typical PHI fund is 36.5% more productive at the end of the period than the beginning, with most gains being technological (38.3%), involving a large upward shift in the industry frontier, countering much smaller losses from scale (−0.2%) and pure technical (−1.1%) inefficiency. This suggests that the PHI industry responded well to the disruption associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Papers\",\"volume\":\"43 2\",\"pages\":\"169-183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1759-3441.12412\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1759-3441.12412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1759-3441.12412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
COVID-19 and Efficiency, Technology and Productivity Change in Australian Private Health Insurance Funds*
We calculate efficiency change, technological progress and productivity growth in Australian private health insurance (PHI) funds using Malmquist indices from 2016/2017 to 2021/2022. Starting in January 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic and the various policy responses to it brought significant disruption to the PHI industry with restrictions placed on elective surgery, and hence insured hospital days, and the use of extras cover for dental, physiotherapy, optical and other services. Lockdowns also saw PHI funds implement work-from-home arrangements and invest to improve policyholder services; the share of Australians with PHI cover grew counter to trend; global financial markets experienced significant volatility, impacting PHI investment revenue and PHI funds delayed even refunded premiums to offset financial pressures on policyholders. We show that productivity declined during the first 18 months of the pandemic and then grew very strongly. We also find the typical PHI fund is 36.5% more productive at the end of the period than the beginning, with most gains being technological (38.3%), involving a large upward shift in the industry frontier, countering much smaller losses from scale (−0.2%) and pure technical (−1.1%) inefficiency. This suggests that the PHI industry responded well to the disruption associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
期刊介绍:
Economic Papers is one of two journals published by the Economics Society of Australia. The journal features a balance of high quality research in applied economics and economic policy analysis which distinguishes it from other Australian journals. The intended audience is the broad range of economists working in business, government and academic communities within Australia and internationally who are interested in economic issues related to Australia and the Asia-Pacific region. Contributions are sought from economists working in these areas and should be written to be accessible to a wide section of our readership. All contributions are refereed.