{"title":"互联网协议语音传输中各种排队技术下 G.711 和 G.729 编解码方案的性能分析","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jeee.03.02.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advancements in internet technology have enabled the integration of different traffic types i.e. data, video, and voice into a single network. This technology offers many benefits but also presents some challenges. Real-time traffic services such as VoIP require a certain Quality of Service (QoS) which cannot be guaranteed on the Internet therefore, key performance metrics become all the more important. The choice of codecs and queuing techniques becomes crucial for ensuring optimal performance, especially in networks with diverse traffic types. This research therefore compared the effects of the combinations of these tools (i.e. queuing techniques and codec schemes) on the quality of VoIP. A simulation approach using the OPNET Modeler 14.5 tool has been used to simulate a network supporting three different types of traffic namely: FTP traffic, Video conferencing traffic, and VoIP traffic. While maintaining the same topology and traffic of the network, different types of codec schemes and queuing techniques have been tested through the measurement of parameters such as delay and throughput. The custom Queuing technique showed the best performance overall while FIFO suffered the highest delay. The graphs were observed to follow the same pattern regardless of the codec scheme used however, G729 performed the better of the two as it received higher amounts of voice traffic and slightly lower delays compared to G711.","PeriodicalId":515574,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electrical Electronics Engineering","volume":"53 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Analysis of G.711 and G.729 Codec Schemes under Various Queuing Techniques in Voice over Internet Protocol Transmissions\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/jeee.03.02.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Advancements in internet technology have enabled the integration of different traffic types i.e. data, video, and voice into a single network. This technology offers many benefits but also presents some challenges. Real-time traffic services such as VoIP require a certain Quality of Service (QoS) which cannot be guaranteed on the Internet therefore, key performance metrics become all the more important. The choice of codecs and queuing techniques becomes crucial for ensuring optimal performance, especially in networks with diverse traffic types. This research therefore compared the effects of the combinations of these tools (i.e. queuing techniques and codec schemes) on the quality of VoIP. A simulation approach using the OPNET Modeler 14.5 tool has been used to simulate a network supporting three different types of traffic namely: FTP traffic, Video conferencing traffic, and VoIP traffic. While maintaining the same topology and traffic of the network, different types of codec schemes and queuing techniques have been tested through the measurement of parameters such as delay and throughput. The custom Queuing technique showed the best performance overall while FIFO suffered the highest delay. The graphs were observed to follow the same pattern regardless of the codec scheme used however, G729 performed the better of the two as it received higher amounts of voice traffic and slightly lower delays compared to G711.\",\"PeriodicalId\":515574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electrical Electronics Engineering\",\"volume\":\"53 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electrical Electronics Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/jeee.03.02.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electrical Electronics Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jeee.03.02.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
互联网技术的进步使得数据、视频和语音等不同类型的流量能够整合到一个网络中。这种技术带来了许多好处,但也带来了一些挑战。VoIP 等实时流量服务需要一定的服务质量(QoS),而这在互联网上是无法保证的,因此,关键性能指标变得更加重要。编解码器和队列技术的选择对于确保最佳性能至关重要,尤其是在具有不同流量类型的网络中。因此,这项研究比较了这些工具(即队列技术和编解码器方案)的组合对 VoIP 质量的影响。使用 OPNET Modeler 14.5 工具的仿真方法模拟了一个支持三种不同流量类型的网络,即 FTP 流量、视频会议流量和音频流量:FTP 流量、视频会议流量和 VoIP 流量。在保持网络拓扑和流量不变的情况下,通过测量延迟和吞吐量等参数,测试了不同类型的编解码方案和队列技术。自定义队列技术的整体性能最佳,而先进先出技术的延迟最高。无论使用哪种编解码器方案,观察到的曲线图都遵循相同的模式,但 G729 的表现更好,因为与 G711 相比,它接收的语音流量更大,延迟也略低。
Performance Analysis of G.711 and G.729 Codec Schemes under Various Queuing Techniques in Voice over Internet Protocol Transmissions
Advancements in internet technology have enabled the integration of different traffic types i.e. data, video, and voice into a single network. This technology offers many benefits but also presents some challenges. Real-time traffic services such as VoIP require a certain Quality of Service (QoS) which cannot be guaranteed on the Internet therefore, key performance metrics become all the more important. The choice of codecs and queuing techniques becomes crucial for ensuring optimal performance, especially in networks with diverse traffic types. This research therefore compared the effects of the combinations of these tools (i.e. queuing techniques and codec schemes) on the quality of VoIP. A simulation approach using the OPNET Modeler 14.5 tool has been used to simulate a network supporting three different types of traffic namely: FTP traffic, Video conferencing traffic, and VoIP traffic. While maintaining the same topology and traffic of the network, different types of codec schemes and queuing techniques have been tested through the measurement of parameters such as delay and throughput. The custom Queuing technique showed the best performance overall while FIFO suffered the highest delay. The graphs were observed to follow the same pattern regardless of the codec scheme used however, G729 performed the better of the two as it received higher amounts of voice traffic and slightly lower delays compared to G711.