开发手机应用程序,优化牙科临床教学的组织和评估

IF 2.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH E-Learning and Digital Media Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1177/20427530241239403
Simona Schick, Lydia Eberhard, Luis Wettach, Shila Fazeli, Andreas Heberle, Rainer Neumann, Jörg Miebach, Stefan Titz, Jennifer Fuchs, Sinan Sen, Christopher Lux, Cornelia Frese
{"title":"开发手机应用程序,优化牙科临床教学的组织和评估","authors":"Simona Schick, Lydia Eberhard, Luis Wettach, Shila Fazeli, Andreas Heberle, Rainer Neumann, Jörg Miebach, Stefan Titz, Jennifer Fuchs, Sinan Sen, Christopher Lux, Cornelia Frese","doi":"10.1177/20427530241239403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the current study was to develop an application for mobile devices that can improve the organization and documentation of clinical teaching in dental schools. The app should include a calendar to organize treatments, an overview of all treatments including the treatment stages, a digital waiting-list for the teacher’s assessment, and a standardized recording of all assessment results. Students and members of a Medical Faculty and a Faculty of Computer Science and Business Information Systems jointly developed the app. Twenty-three students tested the usability after 4 weeks. Next, the new app was tried and tested by n = 79 forth-year students who used it for 2 months during their clinical course. Fifth-year students of the same clinical course who did not use the app constituted the control group. Afterwards, the app was standard implemented in both integrated clinical courses and evaluated after 1 year by the same students both in winter and summer semester. After usability test, the majority of students (81%, n = 18) said they would recommend the app and gave it a mean overall score of 2.0 ± 0.6. Next, course organization and assessment was evaluated by n = 75 fourth-year students (95%) who used the app and by n = 40 control students (74%) who did not use the app. Students who used the app reported significantly better organization of treatment ( p = .002), documentation of treatment ( p = .001), waiting for the teacher’s assessment ( p = .038), overview of treatment sessions ( p = .040), and transparency of grading and assessment ( p = .012). After 12 months, the now fifth-year students still gave very good ratings for the organization of the treatment and the transparency of the grading in both evaluations, so that no significant changes were detectable (organization p = .959 and the rating p = .751). The newly created app improves the organization and evaluation of clinical education and even after 1 year of service, the students still perceive the consistently high advantages of digitization.","PeriodicalId":29943,"journal":{"name":"E-Learning and Digital Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a mobile app to optimize organization and assessment for clinical teaching in dentistry\",\"authors\":\"Simona Schick, Lydia Eberhard, Luis Wettach, Shila Fazeli, Andreas Heberle, Rainer Neumann, Jörg Miebach, Stefan Titz, Jennifer Fuchs, Sinan Sen, Christopher Lux, Cornelia Frese\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20427530241239403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the current study was to develop an application for mobile devices that can improve the organization and documentation of clinical teaching in dental schools. The app should include a calendar to organize treatments, an overview of all treatments including the treatment stages, a digital waiting-list for the teacher’s assessment, and a standardized recording of all assessment results. Students and members of a Medical Faculty and a Faculty of Computer Science and Business Information Systems jointly developed the app. Twenty-three students tested the usability after 4 weeks. Next, the new app was tried and tested by n = 79 forth-year students who used it for 2 months during their clinical course. Fifth-year students of the same clinical course who did not use the app constituted the control group. Afterwards, the app was standard implemented in both integrated clinical courses and evaluated after 1 year by the same students both in winter and summer semester. After usability test, the majority of students (81%, n = 18) said they would recommend the app and gave it a mean overall score of 2.0 ± 0.6. Next, course organization and assessment was evaluated by n = 75 fourth-year students (95%) who used the app and by n = 40 control students (74%) who did not use the app. Students who used the app reported significantly better organization of treatment ( p = .002), documentation of treatment ( p = .001), waiting for the teacher’s assessment ( p = .038), overview of treatment sessions ( p = .040), and transparency of grading and assessment ( p = .012). After 12 months, the now fifth-year students still gave very good ratings for the organization of the treatment and the transparency of the grading in both evaluations, so that no significant changes were detectable (organization p = .959 and the rating p = .751). The newly created app improves the organization and evaluation of clinical education and even after 1 year of service, the students still perceive the consistently high advantages of digitization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"E-Learning and Digital Media\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"E-Learning and Digital Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241239403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E-Learning and Digital Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241239403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是开发一款移动设备应用程序,以改善牙科学校临床教学的组织和记录。该应用程序应包括组织治疗的日历、包括治疗阶段在内的所有治疗概览、教师评估的数字候诊名单以及所有评估结果的标准化记录。医学系和计算机科学与商业信息系统系的学生和成员共同开发了这款应用程序。23 名学生在 4 周后进行了可用性测试。接下来,n = 79 名四年级学生在临床课程中试用并测试了这款新应用,他们使用了 2 个月。未使用该应用程序的五年级学生组成对照组。之后,该应用程序在两门综合临床课程中标准实施,并在一年后由相同的学生在冬季和夏季学期进行评估。经过可用性测试,大多数学生(81%,n = 18)表示会推荐该应用程序,并给出了 2.0 ± 0.6 的平均总分。接下来,使用该应用程序的四年级学生 n = 75 人(95%)和未使用该应用程序的对照组学生 n = 40 人(74%)对课程组织和评估进行了评估。使用该应用程序的学生在治疗组织(p = .002)、治疗记录(p = .001)、等待教师评估(p = .038)、治疗课程概览(p = .040)以及评分和评估透明度(p = .012)方面均有明显改善。12 个月后,现在的五年级学生在两次评价中对治疗的组织性和评分的透明度仍然给予了很好的评价,因此没有发现明显的变化(组织性 p = .959,评分 p = .751)。新创建的应用程序改进了临床教学的组织和评估,即使在使用一年后,学生们仍能感受到数字化一贯的高优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a mobile app to optimize organization and assessment for clinical teaching in dentistry
The aim of the current study was to develop an application for mobile devices that can improve the organization and documentation of clinical teaching in dental schools. The app should include a calendar to organize treatments, an overview of all treatments including the treatment stages, a digital waiting-list for the teacher’s assessment, and a standardized recording of all assessment results. Students and members of a Medical Faculty and a Faculty of Computer Science and Business Information Systems jointly developed the app. Twenty-three students tested the usability after 4 weeks. Next, the new app was tried and tested by n = 79 forth-year students who used it for 2 months during their clinical course. Fifth-year students of the same clinical course who did not use the app constituted the control group. Afterwards, the app was standard implemented in both integrated clinical courses and evaluated after 1 year by the same students both in winter and summer semester. After usability test, the majority of students (81%, n = 18) said they would recommend the app and gave it a mean overall score of 2.0 ± 0.6. Next, course organization and assessment was evaluated by n = 75 fourth-year students (95%) who used the app and by n = 40 control students (74%) who did not use the app. Students who used the app reported significantly better organization of treatment ( p = .002), documentation of treatment ( p = .001), waiting for the teacher’s assessment ( p = .038), overview of treatment sessions ( p = .040), and transparency of grading and assessment ( p = .012). After 12 months, the now fifth-year students still gave very good ratings for the organization of the treatment and the transparency of the grading in both evaluations, so that no significant changes were detectable (organization p = .959 and the rating p = .751). The newly created app improves the organization and evaluation of clinical education and even after 1 year of service, the students still perceive the consistently high advantages of digitization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
E-Learning and Digital Media
E-Learning and Digital Media EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing E-learning in higher education: Lessons learned from the pandemic How much ICT literacy is required? The epistemic perceptual framework of Iranian university faculty members during the COVID-19 pandemic AI in the language classroom: Insights from pre-service English teachers The challenges of implementing digital learning platforms in the ministry of information and digitalization in Malawi Enhancing student experience in remote computer programming course practice: A case of the Java language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1