某些植物提取物对储藏产品害虫红面粉甲虫 Tribolium Confusum (Jacquelin Du Val) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) 成虫的功效

Abdullah Ahmady, Ahmad Jawid Moahid, Mohammad Raees Mukhles, Fahim Andar, Abdul Jamil Ahmadi
{"title":"某些植物提取物对储藏产品害虫红面粉甲虫 Tribolium Confusum (Jacquelin Du Val) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) 成虫的功效","authors":"Abdullah Ahmady, Ahmad Jawid Moahid, Mohammad Raees Mukhles, Fahim Andar, Abdul Jamil Ahmadi","doi":"10.47191/ijcsrr/v7-i3-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficacy of five plant extracts, Lantana camara, Ruta chalepensis, Rhazya stricta, Heliotropium bacciferum and Marrubium vulgare against Tribolium confusum ware investigated by admixing plant extract with wheat grains. Mortality (%) increased with increasing concentrations, exposure periods and varying from plant to plant. L.camara and R. chalepensis induced the highest percent of mortalities (95.4 and 93.8%) at 500 ppm after 6 days of exposure respectively, for T. confusum, followed by Rh. Stricta, M. vulgare and H. baccifirum. (91.4, 84.5 and 83,3%) respectively. The lowest LC50s were for L. camara and R. chalepensis (114.61 and 117.78 ppm), after 6 days from exposure respectively, followed by Rh. Stricta, M. vulgare and H. bacciferum (175.48, 251.99 and 309.67 ppm respectively. The rate of repellency increased with increase of dose level. L. camara had the lead in repellent action where repellent percentage was 100 % at 500 ppm followed by R. chalepensiswith, 91%. The repellency rates of other plant extracts were between 50.22 -66.54 at the same concentration which had a moderate repellent action. Statistical analysis showed that all plant extracts revealed significant deference except between H. bacciferum and M. vulgare. Among all the plant extracts L.camara and R. chalepensi were generally more toxic than other plant extracts against T. confusum.","PeriodicalId":503135,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Science Research and Review","volume":"112 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Some Plant Extracts Against Stored-Product Pest Red Flour Beetle, Tribolium Confusum (Jacquelin Du Val) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) Adults\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Ahmady, Ahmad Jawid Moahid, Mohammad Raees Mukhles, Fahim Andar, Abdul Jamil Ahmadi\",\"doi\":\"10.47191/ijcsrr/v7-i3-30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The efficacy of five plant extracts, Lantana camara, Ruta chalepensis, Rhazya stricta, Heliotropium bacciferum and Marrubium vulgare against Tribolium confusum ware investigated by admixing plant extract with wheat grains. Mortality (%) increased with increasing concentrations, exposure periods and varying from plant to plant. L.camara and R. chalepensis induced the highest percent of mortalities (95.4 and 93.8%) at 500 ppm after 6 days of exposure respectively, for T. confusum, followed by Rh. Stricta, M. vulgare and H. baccifirum. (91.4, 84.5 and 83,3%) respectively. The lowest LC50s were for L. camara and R. chalepensis (114.61 and 117.78 ppm), after 6 days from exposure respectively, followed by Rh. Stricta, M. vulgare and H. bacciferum (175.48, 251.99 and 309.67 ppm respectively. The rate of repellency increased with increase of dose level. L. camara had the lead in repellent action where repellent percentage was 100 % at 500 ppm followed by R. chalepensiswith, 91%. The repellency rates of other plant extracts were between 50.22 -66.54 at the same concentration which had a moderate repellent action. Statistical analysis showed that all plant extracts revealed significant deference except between H. bacciferum and M. vulgare. Among all the plant extracts L.camara and R. chalepensi were generally more toxic than other plant extracts against T. confusum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Current Science Research and Review\",\"volume\":\"112 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Current Science Research and Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v7-i3-30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Science Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v7-i3-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过将植物提取物与小麦粒混合,研究了 Lantana camara、Ruta chalepensis、Rhazya stricta、Heliotropium bacciferum 和 Marrubium vulgare 五种植物提取物对褐飞虱的功效。死亡率(%)随着浓度和暴露期的增加而增加,并且因植物而异。在暴露 6 天后,当浓度为 500 ppm 时,L.camara 和 R. chalepensis 对 confusum 的致死率最高(分别为 95.4% 和 93.8%),其次是 Rh.Stricta、M. vulgare 和 H. baccifirum。(分别为 91.4%、84.5% 和 83.3%)。暴露 6 天后,L. camara 和 R. chalepensis 的半数致死浓度最低,分别为 114.61 和 117.78 ppm,其次是 Rh.Stricta、M. vulgare 和 H. bacciferum(分别为 175.48、251.99 和 309.67 ppm)。驱避率随着剂量水平的增加而增加。L. camara 的驱避率最高,在 500 ppm 时为 100%,其次是 R. chalepensis,为 91%。在相同浓度下,其他植物提取物的驱避率在 50.22 -66.54 之间,驱避作用适中。统计分析表明,除 H. bacciferum 和 M. vulgare 外,所有植物提取物都显示出显著的差异。在所有植物提取物中,L.camara 和 R. chalepensi 对 T. confusum 的毒性普遍高于其他植物提取物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Some Plant Extracts Against Stored-Product Pest Red Flour Beetle, Tribolium Confusum (Jacquelin Du Val) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) Adults
The efficacy of five plant extracts, Lantana camara, Ruta chalepensis, Rhazya stricta, Heliotropium bacciferum and Marrubium vulgare against Tribolium confusum ware investigated by admixing plant extract with wheat grains. Mortality (%) increased with increasing concentrations, exposure periods and varying from plant to plant. L.camara and R. chalepensis induced the highest percent of mortalities (95.4 and 93.8%) at 500 ppm after 6 days of exposure respectively, for T. confusum, followed by Rh. Stricta, M. vulgare and H. baccifirum. (91.4, 84.5 and 83,3%) respectively. The lowest LC50s were for L. camara and R. chalepensis (114.61 and 117.78 ppm), after 6 days from exposure respectively, followed by Rh. Stricta, M. vulgare and H. bacciferum (175.48, 251.99 and 309.67 ppm respectively. The rate of repellency increased with increase of dose level. L. camara had the lead in repellent action where repellent percentage was 100 % at 500 ppm followed by R. chalepensiswith, 91%. The repellency rates of other plant extracts were between 50.22 -66.54 at the same concentration which had a moderate repellent action. Statistical analysis showed that all plant extracts revealed significant deference except between H. bacciferum and M. vulgare. Among all the plant extracts L.camara and R. chalepensi were generally more toxic than other plant extracts against T. confusum.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stock Valuation Analysis of Technology Sector Companies Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in the Year 2018-2022 Impact of Sharia Inclusion and Financial Ratios on Stock Price: An Analysis of Companies Listed in the SRI-Kehati Index (2014-2023) Nanosponges Overview on Novel Drug Delivery Formulation The Interplay of Digital Maturity, Financial Performance, and Stock Returns in Indonesian Publicly Listed Banks Analysis of Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Theory on the Detection of Financial Statement Fraud in Service Companies Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) 2018-2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1