找出导致 CSS 考试中英语作文、预习材料和作文失败的因素的调查

Kiran Gul, Waheed Shahzad, Ali Raza, Essam Said Hanandeh, R. A. Zitar, Khaled Aldiabat, R. Shboul, L. Abualigah
{"title":"找出导致 CSS 考试中英语作文、预习材料和作文失败的因素的调查","authors":"Kiran Gul, Waheed Shahzad, Ali Raza, Essam Said Hanandeh, R. A. Zitar, Khaled Aldiabat, R. Shboul, L. Abualigah","doi":"10.32629/jai.v7i5.1254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research study aims to examine why candidates in Pakistan failed the English Essay, Precis, and Composition sections of the Central Superior Services (CSS) tests. Those candidates chosen for various civil service positions take the prestigious and difficult CSS exam. The study aims to discover candidates’ difficulties in these particular CSS exam sections and investigate methods for enhancing their English language ability. A mixed-methods strategy is used in the research process to collect both quantitative and qualitative data. Participants in the CSS exam who once took the English Essay, Precis, and Composition papers and got fail in it received a survey form to respond according to their experience. Other than this, we also conducted semi-structured interviews with CSS test winners currently working as officials, such as Deputy Commissioners, Assistant Commissioners, Assistant Superintendents of Police, and Deputy Superintendents of Police. Insights into the causes of failure and the experiences of successful candidates are sought after from both data sources. The research findings highlighted several key factors contributing to failure in English Essays, Precis, and Composition papers. These factors include lack of comprehension and understanding, grammatical errors, inadequate organization, poor handwriting, insufficient practice, lack of originality, difficulty in adapting to essay prompts and precis passages, poor organization, failure to understand and address the purpose, insufficient development of ideas, failure to reach the required word count, grammatical mistakes, neglecting proofreading and revision, poor writing expression, and weak induction and conclusion in essays, tough paper pattern old formatted curriculum. Participants reported struggling to express their ideas coherently, having limited language skills, facing challenges in managing time effectively, lacking proper precis structure understanding, inadequate expertise in the subject, lack of training and resources, lack of analytical and critical thinking abilities, inadequate exam preparation, time management issues, poor grammar abilities, exam phobia, and limited vocabulary as potential factors contributing to failure.","PeriodicalId":508223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Autonomous Intelligence","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation to identify the factors that cause failure in English essay, precis, and composition papers in CSS exams\",\"authors\":\"Kiran Gul, Waheed Shahzad, Ali Raza, Essam Said Hanandeh, R. A. Zitar, Khaled Aldiabat, R. Shboul, L. Abualigah\",\"doi\":\"10.32629/jai.v7i5.1254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research study aims to examine why candidates in Pakistan failed the English Essay, Precis, and Composition sections of the Central Superior Services (CSS) tests. Those candidates chosen for various civil service positions take the prestigious and difficult CSS exam. The study aims to discover candidates’ difficulties in these particular CSS exam sections and investigate methods for enhancing their English language ability. A mixed-methods strategy is used in the research process to collect both quantitative and qualitative data. Participants in the CSS exam who once took the English Essay, Precis, and Composition papers and got fail in it received a survey form to respond according to their experience. Other than this, we also conducted semi-structured interviews with CSS test winners currently working as officials, such as Deputy Commissioners, Assistant Commissioners, Assistant Superintendents of Police, and Deputy Superintendents of Police. Insights into the causes of failure and the experiences of successful candidates are sought after from both data sources. The research findings highlighted several key factors contributing to failure in English Essays, Precis, and Composition papers. These factors include lack of comprehension and understanding, grammatical errors, inadequate organization, poor handwriting, insufficient practice, lack of originality, difficulty in adapting to essay prompts and precis passages, poor organization, failure to understand and address the purpose, insufficient development of ideas, failure to reach the required word count, grammatical mistakes, neglecting proofreading and revision, poor writing expression, and weak induction and conclusion in essays, tough paper pattern old formatted curriculum. Participants reported struggling to express their ideas coherently, having limited language skills, facing challenges in managing time effectively, lacking proper precis structure understanding, inadequate expertise in the subject, lack of training and resources, lack of analytical and critical thinking abilities, inadequate exam preparation, time management issues, poor grammar abilities, exam phobia, and limited vocabulary as potential factors contributing to failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Autonomous Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Autonomous Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i5.1254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Autonomous Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i5.1254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨巴基斯坦考生未能通过中央高级公务员(CSS)考试中的英语作文、精读和写作部分的原因。那些被选拔担任各种公务员职位的候选人都要参加声望高、难度大的 CSS 考试。本研究旨在发现考生在这些特定 CSS 考试部分中遇到的困难,并探讨提高其英语能力的方法。研究过程中采用了混合方法策略,以收集定量和定性数据。参加过 CSS 考试并在英语作文、Precis 和 Composition 试卷中不及格的考生会收到一份调查表,请他们根据自己的经历作出回答。除此以外,我们还与现任官员(如副警务处处长、助理警务处处长、助理警司和副警司)的 CSS 考试优胜者进行了半结构式访谈。我们希望从这两个数据来源了解失败的原因和成功考生的经验。研究结果强调了导致英语作文、Precis 和 Composition 试卷失败的几个关键因素。这些因素包括缺乏理解和认识、语法错误、条理不清、字迹潦草、练习不足、缺乏原创性、难以适应作文提示和precis段落、条理不清、未能理解和解决目的问题、思路发展不充分、未能达到要求的字数、语法错误、忽视校对和修改、写作表达能力差、作文中的归纳和结论薄弱、试卷模式陈旧格式化课程。学员们表示,难以连贯地表达自己的观点、语言能力有限、在有效管理时间方面面临挑战、缺乏对简述结构的正确理解、学科专业知识不足、缺乏培训和资源、缺乏分析和批判性思维能力、考试准备不足、时间管理问题、语法能力差、考试恐惧症和词汇量有限是导致失败的潜在因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An investigation to identify the factors that cause failure in English essay, precis, and composition papers in CSS exams
The research study aims to examine why candidates in Pakistan failed the English Essay, Precis, and Composition sections of the Central Superior Services (CSS) tests. Those candidates chosen for various civil service positions take the prestigious and difficult CSS exam. The study aims to discover candidates’ difficulties in these particular CSS exam sections and investigate methods for enhancing their English language ability. A mixed-methods strategy is used in the research process to collect both quantitative and qualitative data. Participants in the CSS exam who once took the English Essay, Precis, and Composition papers and got fail in it received a survey form to respond according to their experience. Other than this, we also conducted semi-structured interviews with CSS test winners currently working as officials, such as Deputy Commissioners, Assistant Commissioners, Assistant Superintendents of Police, and Deputy Superintendents of Police. Insights into the causes of failure and the experiences of successful candidates are sought after from both data sources. The research findings highlighted several key factors contributing to failure in English Essays, Precis, and Composition papers. These factors include lack of comprehension and understanding, grammatical errors, inadequate organization, poor handwriting, insufficient practice, lack of originality, difficulty in adapting to essay prompts and precis passages, poor organization, failure to understand and address the purpose, insufficient development of ideas, failure to reach the required word count, grammatical mistakes, neglecting proofreading and revision, poor writing expression, and weak induction and conclusion in essays, tough paper pattern old formatted curriculum. Participants reported struggling to express their ideas coherently, having limited language skills, facing challenges in managing time effectively, lacking proper precis structure understanding, inadequate expertise in the subject, lack of training and resources, lack of analytical and critical thinking abilities, inadequate exam preparation, time management issues, poor grammar abilities, exam phobia, and limited vocabulary as potential factors contributing to failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detecting people in sprinting motion using HPRDenoise: Point cloud denoising with hidden point removal Adaptive Multi-Layer Security Framework (AMLSF) for real-time applications in smart city networks Effective speech recognition for healthcare industry using phonetic system Integrating multisensory information fusion and interaction technologies in smart healthcare systems An investigation to identify the factors that cause failure in English essay, precis, and composition papers in CSS exams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1