什么时候该说,什么时候该保密?在组织环境中使管理者直觉合法化的策略

Christian Le Gousse, Isabelle Bouty
{"title":"什么时候该说,什么时候该保密?在组织环境中使管理者直觉合法化的策略","authors":"Christian Le Gousse, Isabelle Bouty","doi":"10.37725/10.37725/mgmt.2024.9274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to explore the strategies deployed by managers in organisations to legitimate their intuitions. Managerial practice is a continual process of emergence and integration of problems and projects, and by which managers navigate a complex world. To do so, they rely partly on their intuitions, whose effectiveness has largely been demonstrated in the literature. However, the rational model is still considered the optimal cognition and decision-making process in organisations. The persistence of the myth of rationality compels managers to deploy strategies to legitimate their intuitions. But these strategies are poorly understood. The aim of this study therefore was to describe them. For this purpose, we collected 191 accounts of episodes where managers legitimated their intuitions. Our analysis of these accounts revealed seven intuition legitimation strategies. Some of these strategies had not previously been identified in the institutional literature (personalisation, transparency, exploration and compound strategy). For others which had already been partly described (rationalisation, manipulation and relational strategy), we show that managers deploy new modes. These results contribute to the knowledge of legitimation strategies from a conceptual point of view. They also shed some light on the mistrust of intuition that still prevails in organisations, despite its importance.","PeriodicalId":155066,"journal":{"name":"M@n@gement","volume":"4 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When to Talk and When to Keep It to yourself? Strategies for Legitimating Managerial Intuitions in An Organisational Context\",\"authors\":\"Christian Le Gousse, Isabelle Bouty\",\"doi\":\"10.37725/10.37725/mgmt.2024.9274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to explore the strategies deployed by managers in organisations to legitimate their intuitions. Managerial practice is a continual process of emergence and integration of problems and projects, and by which managers navigate a complex world. To do so, they rely partly on their intuitions, whose effectiveness has largely been demonstrated in the literature. However, the rational model is still considered the optimal cognition and decision-making process in organisations. The persistence of the myth of rationality compels managers to deploy strategies to legitimate their intuitions. But these strategies are poorly understood. The aim of this study therefore was to describe them. For this purpose, we collected 191 accounts of episodes where managers legitimated their intuitions. Our analysis of these accounts revealed seven intuition legitimation strategies. Some of these strategies had not previously been identified in the institutional literature (personalisation, transparency, exploration and compound strategy). For others which had already been partly described (rationalisation, manipulation and relational strategy), we show that managers deploy new modes. These results contribute to the knowledge of legitimation strategies from a conceptual point of view. They also shed some light on the mistrust of intuition that still prevails in organisations, despite its importance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":155066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"M@n@gement\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"M@n@gement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37725/10.37725/mgmt.2024.9274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"M@n@gement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37725/10.37725/mgmt.2024.9274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨组织中的管理者为使其直觉合法化而采取的策略。管理实践是一个不断出现和整合问题与项目的过程,管理者通过这一过程驾驭复杂的世界。为此,他们部分地依赖于直觉,而直觉的有效性已在文献中得到了广泛证明。然而,理性模式仍被认为是组织中最佳的认知和决策过程。理性神话的持续存在迫使管理者采取策略,使其直觉合法化。但是,人们对这些策略的理解却很少。因此,本研究旨在描述这些策略。为此,我们收集了 191 个关于管理者将其直觉合法化的案例。通过对这些叙述的分析,我们发现了七种直觉合法化策略。其中一些策略在以前的机构文献中尚未被发现(个性化、透明、探索和复合策略)。对于其他一些已经被部分描述过的策略(合理化、操纵和关系策略),我们表明管理者采用了新的模式。这些结果从概念的角度为人们了解合法化战略做出了贡献。这些结果还揭示了组织中对直觉的不信任,尽管直觉非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When to Talk and When to Keep It to yourself? Strategies for Legitimating Managerial Intuitions in An Organisational Context
The purpose of this study is to explore the strategies deployed by managers in organisations to legitimate their intuitions. Managerial practice is a continual process of emergence and integration of problems and projects, and by which managers navigate a complex world. To do so, they rely partly on their intuitions, whose effectiveness has largely been demonstrated in the literature. However, the rational model is still considered the optimal cognition and decision-making process in organisations. The persistence of the myth of rationality compels managers to deploy strategies to legitimate their intuitions. But these strategies are poorly understood. The aim of this study therefore was to describe them. For this purpose, we collected 191 accounts of episodes where managers legitimated their intuitions. Our analysis of these accounts revealed seven intuition legitimation strategies. Some of these strategies had not previously been identified in the institutional literature (personalisation, transparency, exploration and compound strategy). For others which had already been partly described (rationalisation, manipulation and relational strategy), we show that managers deploy new modes. These results contribute to the knowledge of legitimation strategies from a conceptual point of view. They also shed some light on the mistrust of intuition that still prevails in organisations, despite its importance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tension between Digital Distance and Physical Presence in Hybrid Teaching: Evidence from Two Natural Experiments During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a French Business School How Much Stupidity Do Organisations Need? A Psychodynamic Perspective on Functional Stupidity When to Talk and When to Keep It to yourself? Strategies for Legitimating Managerial Intuitions in An Organisational Context The Construction of A Strategic Issue: Issue Selling as A Narrative Process Socio-Professional Trajectories of Refugees in France: An Identity Work Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1