对与澳大利亚设计洪水估算相关的气候变化科学进行系统审查

C. Wasko, Seth Westra, R. Nathan, A. Pepler, T. Raupach, Andrew Dowdy, F. Johnson, Michelle Ho, Kathy McInnes, Doerte Jakob, Jason P. Evans, G. Villarini, Hayley J. Fowler
{"title":"对与澳大利亚设计洪水估算相关的气候变化科学进行系统审查","authors":"C. Wasko, Seth Westra, R. Nathan, A. Pepler, T. Raupach, Andrew Dowdy, F. Johnson, Michelle Ho, Kathy McInnes, Doerte Jakob, Jason P. Evans, G. Villarini, Hayley J. Fowler","doi":"10.5194/hess-28-1251-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In response to flood risk, design flood estimation is a cornerstone of planning, infrastructure design, setting of insurance premiums, and emergency response planning. Under stationary assumptions, flood guidance and the methods used in design flood estimation are firmly established in practice and mature in their theoretical foundations, but under climate change, guidance is still in its infancy. Human-caused climate change is influencing factors that contribute to flood risk such as rainfall extremes and soil moisture, and there is a need for updated flood guidance. However, a barrier to updating flood guidance is the translation of the science into practical application. For example, most science pertaining to historical changes to flood risk focuses on examining trends in annual maximum flood events or the application of non-stationary flood frequency analysis. Although this science is valuable, in practice, design flood estimation focuses on exceedance probabilities much rarer than annual maximum events, such as the 1 % annual exceedance probability event or even rarer, using rainfall-based procedures, at locations where there are few to no observations of streamflow. Here, we perform a systematic review to summarize the state-of-the-art understanding of the impact of climate change on design flood estimation in the Australian context, while also drawing on international literature. In addition, a meta-analysis, whereby results from multiple studies are combined, is conducted for extreme rainfall to provide quantitative estimates of possible future changes. This information is described in the context of contemporary design flood estimation practice to facilitate the inclusion of climate science into design flood estimation practice.\n","PeriodicalId":507846,"journal":{"name":"Hydrology and Earth System Sciences","volume":"7 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of climate change science relevant to Australian design flood estimation\",\"authors\":\"C. Wasko, Seth Westra, R. Nathan, A. Pepler, T. Raupach, Andrew Dowdy, F. Johnson, Michelle Ho, Kathy McInnes, Doerte Jakob, Jason P. Evans, G. Villarini, Hayley J. Fowler\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/hess-28-1251-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. In response to flood risk, design flood estimation is a cornerstone of planning, infrastructure design, setting of insurance premiums, and emergency response planning. Under stationary assumptions, flood guidance and the methods used in design flood estimation are firmly established in practice and mature in their theoretical foundations, but under climate change, guidance is still in its infancy. Human-caused climate change is influencing factors that contribute to flood risk such as rainfall extremes and soil moisture, and there is a need for updated flood guidance. However, a barrier to updating flood guidance is the translation of the science into practical application. For example, most science pertaining to historical changes to flood risk focuses on examining trends in annual maximum flood events or the application of non-stationary flood frequency analysis. Although this science is valuable, in practice, design flood estimation focuses on exceedance probabilities much rarer than annual maximum events, such as the 1 % annual exceedance probability event or even rarer, using rainfall-based procedures, at locations where there are few to no observations of streamflow. Here, we perform a systematic review to summarize the state-of-the-art understanding of the impact of climate change on design flood estimation in the Australian context, while also drawing on international literature. In addition, a meta-analysis, whereby results from multiple studies are combined, is conducted for extreme rainfall to provide quantitative estimates of possible future changes. This information is described in the context of contemporary design flood estimation practice to facilitate the inclusion of climate science into design flood estimation practice.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":507846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrology and Earth System Sciences\",\"volume\":\"7 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrology and Earth System Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1251-2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrology and Earth System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1251-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要为应对洪水风险,设计洪水估算是规划、基础设施设计、保险费厘定和应急计划的基石。在固定假设条件下,洪水指导和设计洪水估算方法已在实践中得到牢固确立,理论基础也已成熟,但在气候变化条件下,洪水指导仍处于起步阶段。人为造成的气候变化正在影响极端降雨和土壤湿度等造成洪水风险的因素,因此需要更新洪水指南。然而,更新洪水指南的一个障碍是将科学转化为实际应用。例如,有关洪水风险历史变化的大多数科学都侧重于研究年度最大洪水事件的趋势或应用非稳态洪水频率分析。虽然这门科学很有价值,但在实践中,设计洪水估算侧重于比年最大洪水事件更罕见的超标概率,如 1% 的年超标概率事件,甚至更罕见的、使用基于降雨的程序的事件,这些事件发生在很少或根本没有观测到河水流量的地方。在此,我们对气候变化对澳大利亚设计洪水估算影响的最新认识进行了系统回顾,同时也参考了国际文献。此外,我们还对极端降雨进行了荟萃分析,即综合多项研究结果,对未来可能发生的变化进行量化估算。这些信息将结合当代设计洪水估算实践进行描述,以促进将气候科学纳入设计洪水估算实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of climate change science relevant to Australian design flood estimation
Abstract. In response to flood risk, design flood estimation is a cornerstone of planning, infrastructure design, setting of insurance premiums, and emergency response planning. Under stationary assumptions, flood guidance and the methods used in design flood estimation are firmly established in practice and mature in their theoretical foundations, but under climate change, guidance is still in its infancy. Human-caused climate change is influencing factors that contribute to flood risk such as rainfall extremes and soil moisture, and there is a need for updated flood guidance. However, a barrier to updating flood guidance is the translation of the science into practical application. For example, most science pertaining to historical changes to flood risk focuses on examining trends in annual maximum flood events or the application of non-stationary flood frequency analysis. Although this science is valuable, in practice, design flood estimation focuses on exceedance probabilities much rarer than annual maximum events, such as the 1 % annual exceedance probability event or even rarer, using rainfall-based procedures, at locations where there are few to no observations of streamflow. Here, we perform a systematic review to summarize the state-of-the-art understanding of the impact of climate change on design flood estimation in the Australian context, while also drawing on international literature. In addition, a meta-analysis, whereby results from multiple studies are combined, is conducted for extreme rainfall to provide quantitative estimates of possible future changes. This information is described in the context of contemporary design flood estimation practice to facilitate the inclusion of climate science into design flood estimation practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flood drivers and trends: a case study of the Geul River catchment (the Netherlands) over the past half century Evolution of river regimes in the Mekong River basin over 8 decades and the role of dams in recent hydrological extremes Machine-learning-constrained projection of bivariate hydrological drought magnitudes and socioeconomic risks over China Impact of reservoir evaporation on future water availability in north-eastern Brazil: a multi-scenario assessment The agricultural expansion in South America's Dry Chaco: regional hydroclimate effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1