Fardiah Tilawati Sitanggang, James Perdinan Simanjuntak, Nasrah Nasrah, Ridwansyah Ridwansyah, Arvida Bar
{"title":"使用磁珠法和旋转柱法提取 SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR 中 RNA 的阈值循环结果比较分析","authors":"Fardiah Tilawati Sitanggang, James Perdinan Simanjuntak, Nasrah Nasrah, Ridwansyah Ridwansyah, Arvida Bar","doi":"10.21931/rb/2024.09.01.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) belongs to the large family of SARS-CoV viruses, initially emerging\nin 2002-2003. In humans, this virus triggers respiratory infectious diseases. COVID-19, a new variant of\nSARS-CoV, was identified in humans following an unprecedented incident in Wuhan, China, in December\n2019. This virus typically manifests mild symptoms, including a runny nose, sore throat, cough, and fever.\nThe Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT), specifically the realtime Reverse Transcription Polymerase\nChain Reaction (rRT-PCR) examination, is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for diagnosing COVID-19. This study assessed potential differences in Threshold Cycle results during RNA extraction using magnetic beads compared to spin columns in the SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR method. The population for this study was selected through accidental sampling from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs\nof COVID-19 patients obtained between December 2022 and April 2023, with Threshold Cycle values\n<30,000. The samples were stored at -80°C. The findings revealed that the average N (VIC) was 23.359, and\nRdRP (FAM) was 25.558 in the Magnetic Beads method, indicating a lower value compared to the average N\n(VIC) of 29.200 and RdRP (FAM) of 29.661 in the Spin Column method. This suggests that the Magnetic\nBeads method exhibited greater sensitivity than the Spin Column method. The statistical analysis confirmed\nthese differences, with a P value of 0.003 in N (VIC) and the P value of 0.000 in RdRP (FAM). Consequently,\nit can be concluded that there is a significant 19.5% difference in the Threshold Cycle during RNA extraction\nusing Magnetic Beads and Spin Column in the examination of the SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR method.\nKeywords: Sars-CoV-2; rRT-PCR; Magnetic Beads; Spin Column; Threshold Cycle.","PeriodicalId":505112,"journal":{"name":"Bionatura","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Threshold Cycle Results for RNA Extraction in SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR Using Magnetic Beads and Spin Column Methods\",\"authors\":\"Fardiah Tilawati Sitanggang, James Perdinan Simanjuntak, Nasrah Nasrah, Ridwansyah Ridwansyah, Arvida Bar\",\"doi\":\"10.21931/rb/2024.09.01.64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) belongs to the large family of SARS-CoV viruses, initially emerging\\nin 2002-2003. In humans, this virus triggers respiratory infectious diseases. COVID-19, a new variant of\\nSARS-CoV, was identified in humans following an unprecedented incident in Wuhan, China, in December\\n2019. This virus typically manifests mild symptoms, including a runny nose, sore throat, cough, and fever.\\nThe Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT), specifically the realtime Reverse Transcription Polymerase\\nChain Reaction (rRT-PCR) examination, is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for diagnosing COVID-19. This study assessed potential differences in Threshold Cycle results during RNA extraction using magnetic beads compared to spin columns in the SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR method. The population for this study was selected through accidental sampling from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs\\nof COVID-19 patients obtained between December 2022 and April 2023, with Threshold Cycle values\\n<30,000. The samples were stored at -80°C. The findings revealed that the average N (VIC) was 23.359, and\\nRdRP (FAM) was 25.558 in the Magnetic Beads method, indicating a lower value compared to the average N\\n(VIC) of 29.200 and RdRP (FAM) of 29.661 in the Spin Column method. This suggests that the Magnetic\\nBeads method exhibited greater sensitivity than the Spin Column method. The statistical analysis confirmed\\nthese differences, with a P value of 0.003 in N (VIC) and the P value of 0.000 in RdRP (FAM). Consequently,\\nit can be concluded that there is a significant 19.5% difference in the Threshold Cycle during RNA extraction\\nusing Magnetic Beads and Spin Column in the examination of the SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR method.\\nKeywords: Sars-CoV-2; rRT-PCR; Magnetic Beads; Spin Column; Threshold Cycle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bionatura\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bionatura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21931/rb/2024.09.01.64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bionatura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21931/rb/2024.09.01.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Analysis of Threshold Cycle Results for RNA Extraction in SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR Using Magnetic Beads and Spin Column Methods
Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) belongs to the large family of SARS-CoV viruses, initially emerging
in 2002-2003. In humans, this virus triggers respiratory infectious diseases. COVID-19, a new variant of
SARS-CoV, was identified in humans following an unprecedented incident in Wuhan, China, in December
2019. This virus typically manifests mild symptoms, including a runny nose, sore throat, cough, and fever.
The Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT), specifically the realtime Reverse Transcription Polymerase
Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) examination, is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for diagnosing COVID-19. This study assessed potential differences in Threshold Cycle results during RNA extraction using magnetic beads compared to spin columns in the SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR method. The population for this study was selected through accidental sampling from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs
of COVID-19 patients obtained between December 2022 and April 2023, with Threshold Cycle values
<30,000. The samples were stored at -80°C. The findings revealed that the average N (VIC) was 23.359, and
RdRP (FAM) was 25.558 in the Magnetic Beads method, indicating a lower value compared to the average N
(VIC) of 29.200 and RdRP (FAM) of 29.661 in the Spin Column method. This suggests that the Magnetic
Beads method exhibited greater sensitivity than the Spin Column method. The statistical analysis confirmed
these differences, with a P value of 0.003 in N (VIC) and the P value of 0.000 in RdRP (FAM). Consequently,
it can be concluded that there is a significant 19.5% difference in the Threshold Cycle during RNA extraction
using Magnetic Beads and Spin Column in the examination of the SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR method.
Keywords: Sars-CoV-2; rRT-PCR; Magnetic Beads; Spin Column; Threshold Cycle.