对中国课堂上工科学生批判性思维的系统回顾

Zhiying Liu, Sook Jhee Yoon, Maoxing Zheng
{"title":"对中国课堂上工科学生批判性思维的系统回顾","authors":"Zhiying Liu, Sook Jhee Yoon, Maoxing Zheng","doi":"10.32629/jai.v7i5.916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of fast technical breakthroughs, globalization, a customer-centric emphasis, and team-based design techniques, 21st century workplace expectations for engineers have evolved. These changes need that engineering graduates possess highly developed critical thinking abilities in order to work at a high level in the engineering field. Critical thinking has been introduced as a fundamental ability in the new Skills Framework. Countries from all over the globe have taken steps to foster the development of critical thinking skills in their citizens, and researchers from a variety of fields pay attention to and conduct critical thinking research. However, comprehensive research on the teaching and learning of critical thinking in the Chinese setting is scarce. This study examines the research literature on critical thinking in Chinese classrooms in order to discover which theories and research methodologies are applied in critical thinking research. By scanning the CNKI and Web of Science databases, 63 Chinese and English publications were discovered using the PRISMA model. The analysis demonstrates that Chinese schools lack theoretical applications of critical thinking research. In the meanwhile, three distinct research techniques are used, however quantitative research approaches have the most papers. According to research, anyone interested in studying critical thinking should be familiar with its theory. In addition, researchers must use a range of study methodologies to guarantee that the results give information beyond summaries of critical thinking. Finally, Chinese researchers on critical thinking need greater exposure to qualitative data sources in order to modify their data gathering procedures.","PeriodicalId":508223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Autonomous Intelligence","volume":"39 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of critical thinking for Engineering Students in Chinese classrooms\",\"authors\":\"Zhiying Liu, Sook Jhee Yoon, Maoxing Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.32629/jai.v7i5.916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a result of fast technical breakthroughs, globalization, a customer-centric emphasis, and team-based design techniques, 21st century workplace expectations for engineers have evolved. These changes need that engineering graduates possess highly developed critical thinking abilities in order to work at a high level in the engineering field. Critical thinking has been introduced as a fundamental ability in the new Skills Framework. Countries from all over the globe have taken steps to foster the development of critical thinking skills in their citizens, and researchers from a variety of fields pay attention to and conduct critical thinking research. However, comprehensive research on the teaching and learning of critical thinking in the Chinese setting is scarce. This study examines the research literature on critical thinking in Chinese classrooms in order to discover which theories and research methodologies are applied in critical thinking research. By scanning the CNKI and Web of Science databases, 63 Chinese and English publications were discovered using the PRISMA model. The analysis demonstrates that Chinese schools lack theoretical applications of critical thinking research. In the meanwhile, three distinct research techniques are used, however quantitative research approaches have the most papers. According to research, anyone interested in studying critical thinking should be familiar with its theory. In addition, researchers must use a range of study methodologies to guarantee that the results give information beyond summaries of critical thinking. Finally, Chinese researchers on critical thinking need greater exposure to qualitative data sources in order to modify their data gathering procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Autonomous Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"39 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Autonomous Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i5.916\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Autonomous Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i5.916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于技术的快速突破、全球化、以客户为中心和团队设计技术的发展,21 世纪对工程 师的职场期望也发生了变化。这些变化要求工程学毕业生具备高度发达的批判性思维能力,以便在工程学领域从事高水平的工作。在新的技能框架中,批判性思维已被列为一项基本能力。世界各国都在采取措施培养本国公民的批判性思维能力,各领域的研究人员也都在关注和开展批判性思维的研究。然而,关于批判性思维在中国环境下的教与学的综合研究却很少。本研究考察了有关中国课堂批判性思维的研究文献,以发现批判性思维研究中应用了哪些理论和研究方法。通过扫描 CNKI 和 Web of Science 数据库,利用 PRISMA 模型发现了 63 篇中英文出版物。分析表明,中国学校缺乏批判性思维研究的理论应用。同时,三种不同的研究方法都有使用,但定量研究方法的论文最多。研究表明,任何有兴趣研究批判性思维的人都应该熟悉批判性思维的理论。此外,研究者还必须使用一系列研究方法,以保证研究结果能提供批判性思维总结之外的信息。最后,中国的批判性思维研究者需要更多地接触定性数据来源,以修改他们的数据收集程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of critical thinking for Engineering Students in Chinese classrooms
As a result of fast technical breakthroughs, globalization, a customer-centric emphasis, and team-based design techniques, 21st century workplace expectations for engineers have evolved. These changes need that engineering graduates possess highly developed critical thinking abilities in order to work at a high level in the engineering field. Critical thinking has been introduced as a fundamental ability in the new Skills Framework. Countries from all over the globe have taken steps to foster the development of critical thinking skills in their citizens, and researchers from a variety of fields pay attention to and conduct critical thinking research. However, comprehensive research on the teaching and learning of critical thinking in the Chinese setting is scarce. This study examines the research literature on critical thinking in Chinese classrooms in order to discover which theories and research methodologies are applied in critical thinking research. By scanning the CNKI and Web of Science databases, 63 Chinese and English publications were discovered using the PRISMA model. The analysis demonstrates that Chinese schools lack theoretical applications of critical thinking research. In the meanwhile, three distinct research techniques are used, however quantitative research approaches have the most papers. According to research, anyone interested in studying critical thinking should be familiar with its theory. In addition, researchers must use a range of study methodologies to guarantee that the results give information beyond summaries of critical thinking. Finally, Chinese researchers on critical thinking need greater exposure to qualitative data sources in order to modify their data gathering procedures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detecting people in sprinting motion using HPRDenoise: Point cloud denoising with hidden point removal Adaptive Multi-Layer Security Framework (AMLSF) for real-time applications in smart city networks Effective speech recognition for healthcare industry using phonetic system Integrating multisensory information fusion and interaction technologies in smart healthcare systems An investigation to identify the factors that cause failure in English essay, precis, and composition papers in CSS exams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1