多元线性测量误差模型的有效性检验

Alexander Kukush, Igor Mandel
{"title":"多元线性测量误差模型的有效性检验","authors":"Alexander Kukush, Igor Mandel","doi":"10.3233/mas-231494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A criterion is proposed for testing the hypothesis about the nature of the error variance in the dependent variable in a linear model, which separates correctly and incorrectly specified models. In the former one, only the measurement errors determine the variance (i.e., the dependent variable is correctly explained by the independent ones, up to measurement errors), while the latter model lacks some independent covariates (or has a nonlinear structure). The proposed MEMV (Measurement Error Model Validity) test checks the validity of the model when both dependent and independent covariates are measured with errors. The criterion has an asymptotic character, but numerical simulations outlined approximate boundaries where estimates make sense. A practical example of the test’s implementation is discussed in detail – it shows the test’s ability to detect wrong specifications even in seemingly perfect models. Estimations of the errors due to the omission of the variables in the model are provided in the simulation study. The relation between measurement errors and model specification has not been studied earlier, and the proposed criterion may stimulate future research in this important area.","PeriodicalId":35000,"journal":{"name":"Model Assisted Statistics and Applications","volume":"53 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A validity test for a multivariate linear measurement error model\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Kukush, Igor Mandel\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/mas-231494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A criterion is proposed for testing the hypothesis about the nature of the error variance in the dependent variable in a linear model, which separates correctly and incorrectly specified models. In the former one, only the measurement errors determine the variance (i.e., the dependent variable is correctly explained by the independent ones, up to measurement errors), while the latter model lacks some independent covariates (or has a nonlinear structure). The proposed MEMV (Measurement Error Model Validity) test checks the validity of the model when both dependent and independent covariates are measured with errors. The criterion has an asymptotic character, but numerical simulations outlined approximate boundaries where estimates make sense. A practical example of the test’s implementation is discussed in detail – it shows the test’s ability to detect wrong specifications even in seemingly perfect models. Estimations of the errors due to the omission of the variables in the model are provided in the simulation study. The relation between measurement errors and model specification has not been studied earlier, and the proposed criterion may stimulate future research in this important area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Model Assisted Statistics and Applications\",\"volume\":\"53 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Model Assisted Statistics and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/mas-231494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Model Assisted Statistics and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/mas-231494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为检验线性模型中因变量误差方差性质的假设提出了一个标准,该标准将正确和不正确的模型区分开来。在前者中,只有测量误差决定方差(即因变量由独立变量正确解释,直至测量误差),而后者模型缺乏一些独立协变量(或具有非线性结构)。所提出的 MEMV(测量误差模型有效性)检验是在因变量和独立协变量的测量都存在误差的情况下检验模型的有效性。该标准具有渐近特性,但数值模拟勾勒出了估算有意义的近似边界。本文详细讨论了实施该检验的一个实际例子--它显示了该检验即使在看似完美的模型中也能检测出错误的规格。在模拟研究中提供了因模型中遗漏变量而导致的误差估算。测量误差与模型规范之间的关系尚未得到深入研究,所提出的标准可能会促进未来在这一重要领域的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A validity test for a multivariate linear measurement error model
A criterion is proposed for testing the hypothesis about the nature of the error variance in the dependent variable in a linear model, which separates correctly and incorrectly specified models. In the former one, only the measurement errors determine the variance (i.e., the dependent variable is correctly explained by the independent ones, up to measurement errors), while the latter model lacks some independent covariates (or has a nonlinear structure). The proposed MEMV (Measurement Error Model Validity) test checks the validity of the model when both dependent and independent covariates are measured with errors. The criterion has an asymptotic character, but numerical simulations outlined approximate boundaries where estimates make sense. A practical example of the test’s implementation is discussed in detail – it shows the test’s ability to detect wrong specifications even in seemingly perfect models. Estimations of the errors due to the omission of the variables in the model are provided in the simulation study. The relation between measurement errors and model specification has not been studied earlier, and the proposed criterion may stimulate future research in this important area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Model Assisted Statistics and Applications
Model Assisted Statistics and Applications Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Model Assisted Statistics and Applications is a peer reviewed international journal. Model Assisted Statistics means an improvement of inference and analysis by use of correlated information, or an underlying theoretical or design model. This might be the design, adjustment, estimation, or analytical phase of statistical project. This information may be survey generated or coming from an independent source. Original papers in the field of sampling theory, econometrics, time-series, design of experiments, and multivariate analysis will be preferred. Papers of both applied and theoretical topics are acceptable.
期刊最新文献
Limitations of the propensity scores approach: A simulation study INAR(1) process with Poisson-transmuted record type exponential innovations Estimation of three-parameter Fréchet distribution for the number of days from drug administration to remission in small sample sizes Analysis of kidney infection data using correlated compound poisson frailty models Parametric analysis and model selection for economic evaluation of survival data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1