论坛：权威、主权、解释......潜台词？近期德国史学界的争议

IF 0.4 3区人文科学 Q1 HISTORY Central European History Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1017/s0008938923000857

B. Hett, Jennifer V. Evans, Anna Hájková, Hedwig Richter, Nathan Stoltzfus

{"title":"论坛：权威、主权、解释......潜台词？近期德国史学界的争议","authors":"B. Hett, Jennifer V. Evans, Anna Hájková, Hedwig Richter, Nathan Stoltzfus","doi":"10.1017/s0008938923000857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like other historiographical fields, that of German history has been defined through most of its existence by the things historians argued about. We could go back well over a hundred years to the Methodenstreit over Karl Lamprecht's efforts to write multidisciplinary history, follow the line through the work of Eckart Kehr, Fritz Fischer, Hans Ulrich Wehler, and the Sonderweg debate, and continue on through the Historikerstreit and the Historikerinnenstreit of the 1980s, and the Goldhagen and Wehrmacht exhibit fights in the mid-1990s, to recent debates over the relative weight of colonial and Holocaust memory.","PeriodicalId":45053,"journal":{"name":"Central European History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forum: Authority, Sovereignty, Interpretation … Subtext? Controversies in Recent German Historiography\",\"authors\":\"B. Hett, Jennifer V. Evans, Anna Hájková, Hedwig Richter, Nathan Stoltzfus\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0008938923000857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Like other historiographical fields, that of German history has been defined through most of its existence by the things historians argued about. We could go back well over a hundred years to the Methodenstreit over Karl Lamprecht's efforts to write multidisciplinary history, follow the line through the work of Eckart Kehr, Fritz Fischer, Hans Ulrich Wehler, and the Sonderweg debate, and continue on through the Historikerstreit and the Historikerinnenstreit of the 1980s, and the Goldhagen and Wehrmacht exhibit fights in the mid-1990s, to recent debates over the relative weight of colonial and Holocaust memory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008938923000857\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"人文科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008938923000857","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"人文科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

与其他史学领域一样，德国史在其存在的大部分时间里都是由史学家们争论的事物所定义的。我们可以追溯到一百多年前关于卡尔-兰普雷希特（Karl Lamprecht）撰写多学科历史的 "方法论争论"（Methodenstreit），沿着埃卡特-克尔（Eckart Kehr）、弗里茨-菲舍尔（Fritz Fischer）、汉斯-乌尔里希-韦勒（Hans Ulrich Wehler）的著作和 "桑德韦格"（Sonderweg）争论的脉络，继续追溯到 20 世纪 80 年代的 "历史学家争论"（Historikerstreit）和 "历史学家之争"（Historikerinnenstreit），以及 20 世纪 90 年代中期的 "戈尔哈根"（Goldhagen）和 "国防军"（Wehrmacht）展览之争，直到最近关于殖民记忆和大屠杀记忆的相对重要性的争论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Forum: Authority, Sovereignty, Interpretation … Subtext? Controversies in Recent German Historiography

Like other historiographical fields, that of German history has been defined through most of its existence by the things historians argued about. We could go back well over a hundred years to the Methodenstreit over Karl Lamprecht's efforts to write multidisciplinary history, follow the line through the work of Eckart Kehr, Fritz Fischer, Hans Ulrich Wehler, and the Sonderweg debate, and continue on through the Historikerstreit and the Historikerinnenstreit of the 1980s, and the Goldhagen and Wehrmacht exhibit fights in the mid-1990s, to recent debates over the relative weight of colonial and Holocaust memory.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Central European History Multiple-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Central European History offers articles, review essays, and book reviews that range widely through the history of Germany, Austria, and other German-speaking regions of Central Europe from the medieval era to the present. All topics and approaches to history are welcome, whether cultural, social, political, diplomatic, intellectual, economic, and military history, as well as historiography and methodology. Contributions that treat new fields, such as post-1945 and post-1989 history, maturing fields such as gender history, and less-represented fields such as medieval history and the history of the Habsburg lands are especially desired. The journal thus aims to be the primary venue for scholarly exchange and debate among scholars of the history of Central Europe.