安提波洛市 I 区科学领域的数字化印刷战略干预材料:强化模式的基础

Michelle Ruiz Cabot
{"title":"安提波洛市 I 区科学领域的数字化印刷战略干预材料:强化模式的基础","authors":"Michelle Ruiz Cabot","doi":"10.54476/apjaet/45280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digitization, technology, and scientific education are strong educational reform drivers. Modern educational institutions use computers and the Internet for all their activities. It’s everywhere now. Thus, digitally printed science intervention material is crucial in schools and society. Today, digitalized printed materials are the main teaching and learning channel. The Philippine Department of Education (DepEd) uses extracurricular activities to help students who struggle in science, technology, and other subjects. Educators, administrators, and curriculum planners use digitally enhanced printed materials and multimedia instructions to develop every aspect of teaching and learning. This study assessed the validity and acceptability of the Digitized Printed Strategic Intervention Material (DPSIM) in teaching Science as expected against evaluation. The respondents of the study were one (1) Technology Expert, five (5) Science Administrators, and one hundred (100) Science teachers who were described in terms of position, educational attainment, training attended in ICT, teaching experiences, and the ability to handle ICT. The validity is assessed in terms of content, manner of presentation, language and style, and evaluative tools. Acceptability is assessed in terms of clarity, usefulness, suitability, adequacy, and timeliness. Various resources such as books, published studies on the net, and other materials were gathered in the construction of the research questionnaire. Descriptive Statistics such as Mean and Frequency, T-test, and ANOVA were utilized to test the statistical significance of the variables presented. Results revealed that there is no significant difference in the assessment of the two groups (expected and evaluated responses) of respondents on the validity of the Digitized Printed Strategic Intervention Material (DPSIM), but there is a significant difference in the assessment of respondents in terms of acceptability of DPSIM. When respondents were grouped according to their profile in terms of position, educational attainment, training attended in Information Communication Technology (ICT), teaching experience, and the ability to handle ICT in Teaching, it was identified that differences in the responses for validity were brought about by the respondent’s difference in ICT training attended and their ability to handle ICT in teaching. The validity of DPSIM is perceived to be a high extent, with Application, Method of Presentation, Language and Style, and Evaluative Tools as the criteria that need further improvement. For the acceptability of DPSIM, there is a significant difference in the responses when grouped according to profile. However, it is worth noting that overall, no criteria were perceived to be needing improvement. Acceptability has also been categorized to a very high extent. It concluded that the Digitized Printed Strategic Intervention Material (DPSIM) is an effective tool in teaching Science. The study included that school administrators should evaluate the DPSIM whether its contents conform to the curriculum standards. Teachers should first examine the DPSIM use to determine the contents that align with the objective of the lesson. Parents should support children with technology materials that supplement the lesson; pupils can explore the DPSIM, which promotes independent learning; and future researchers can conduct similar studies that assess developed DPSIM if the same education will be conducted in the future. Keyword: Digitized Printed Strategic Intervention Material (DPSIM)","PeriodicalId":336220,"journal":{"name":"APJAET - Journal Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digitized Printed Strategic Intervention Material in Science in District I of Antipolo City: Basis for Enhancement Model\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Ruiz Cabot\",\"doi\":\"10.54476/apjaet/45280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digitization, technology, and scientific education are strong educational reform drivers. Modern educational institutions use computers and the Internet for all their activities. It’s everywhere now. Thus, digitally printed science intervention material is crucial in schools and society. Today, digitalized printed materials are the main teaching and learning channel. The Philippine Department of Education (DepEd) uses extracurricular activities to help students who struggle in science, technology, and other subjects. Educators, administrators, and curriculum planners use digitally enhanced printed materials and multimedia instructions to develop every aspect of teaching and learning. This study assessed the validity and acceptability of the Digitized Printed Strategic Intervention Material (DPSIM) in teaching Science as expected against evaluation. The respondents of the study were one (1) Technology Expert, five (5) Science Administrators, and one hundred (100) Science teachers who were described in terms of position, educational attainment, training attended in ICT, teaching experiences, and the ability to handle ICT. The validity is assessed in terms of content, manner of presentation, language and style, and evaluative tools. Acceptability is assessed in terms of clarity, usefulness, suitability, adequacy, and timeliness. Various resources such as books, published studies on the net, and other materials were gathered in the construction of the research questionnaire. Descriptive Statistics such as Mean and Frequency, T-test, and ANOVA were utilized to test the statistical significance of the variables presented. Results revealed that there is no significant difference in the assessment of the two groups (expected and evaluated responses) of respondents on the validity of the Digitized Printed Strategic Intervention Material (DPSIM), but there is a significant difference in the assessment of respondents in terms of acceptability of DPSIM. When respondents were grouped according to their profile in terms of position, educational attainment, training attended in Information Communication Technology (ICT), teaching experience, and the ability to handle ICT in Teaching, it was identified that differences in the responses for validity were brought about by the respondent’s difference in ICT training attended and their ability to handle ICT in teaching. The validity of DPSIM is perceived to be a high extent, with Application, Method of Presentation, Language and Style, and Evaluative Tools as the criteria that need further improvement. For the acceptability of DPSIM, there is a significant difference in the responses when grouped according to profile. However, it is worth noting that overall, no criteria were perceived to be needing improvement. Acceptability has also been categorized to a very high extent. It concluded that the Digitized Printed Strategic Intervention Material (DPSIM) is an effective tool in teaching Science. The study included that school administrators should evaluate the DPSIM whether its contents conform to the curriculum standards. Teachers should first examine the DPSIM use to determine the contents that align with the objective of the lesson. Parents should support children with technology materials that supplement the lesson; pupils can explore the DPSIM, which promotes independent learning; and future researchers can conduct similar studies that assess developed DPSIM if the same education will be conducted in the future. Keyword: Digitized Printed Strategic Intervention Material (DPSIM)\",\"PeriodicalId\":336220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"APJAET - Journal Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology\",\"volume\":\"15 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"APJAET - Journal Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54476/apjaet/45280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APJAET - Journal Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54476/apjaet/45280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字化、技术和科学教育是教育改革的强大动力。现代教育机构的所有活动都使用计算机和互联网。它现在无处不在。因此,数字化印刷的科学干预材料在学校和社会中至关重要。如今,数字化印刷材料已成为主要的教学渠道。菲律宾教育部(DepEd)利用课外活动来帮助在科学、技术和其他学科上有困难的学生。教育工作者、管理者和课程规划者使用数字增强印刷材料和多媒体教学来发展教学的各个方面。本研究评估了数字化印刷战略干预材料(DPSIM)在科学教学中的有效性和可接受性,以达到预期的评价效果。本研究的受访者包括一(1)名技术专家、五(5)名科学行政人员和一百(100)名科学教师,他们在职位、教育程度、参加过的信息与传播技术培训、教学经验和处理信息与传播技术的能力等方面均有描述。有效性从内容、呈现方式、语言和风格以及评价工具等方面进行评估。可接受性从清晰度、有用性、适合性、充分性和及时性等方面进行评估。在编制研究问卷时,收集了各种资源,如书籍、网络上已发表的研究报告和其他材料。利用描述性统计(如平均值和频率)、T 检验和方差分析来检验所列变量的统计意义。结果显示,两组受访者(预期反应和评价反应)对数字化印刷版战略干预材料(DPSIM)有效性的评价没有显著差异,但受访者对 DPSIM 可接受性的评价存在显著差异。根据受访者的职位、教育程度、接受过的信息传播技术(ICT)培训、教学经验以及在教学中运用信息传播技术的能力对其进行分组后发现,受访者在接受过的信息传播技术培训以及在教学中运用信息传播技术的能力方面的差异,导致了受访者对有效性的回答存在差异。DPSIM 的有效性被认为很高,而应用、演示方法、语言和风格以及评价工具则是需要进一步改进的标准。至于 DPSIM 的可接受性,按情况分组后,答复有显著差异。然而,值得注意的是,总体而言,没有任何标准需要改进。可接受性也被归类为非常高。研究结论认为,数字化印刷策略干预材料(DPSIM)是科学教学的有效工具。研究还指出,学校管理者应评估《数字化印刷策略干预材料》的内容是否符合课程标准。教师应首先检查 DPSIM 的使用情况,以确定其内容是否符合课程目标。家长应为孩子提供技术材料,作为课程的补充;学生可以探索 DPSIM,促进自主学习;如果将来要开展同样的教育,未来的研究人员可以开展类似的研究,评估已开发的 DPSIM。关键词数字化印刷战略干预材料(DPSIM)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digitized Printed Strategic Intervention Material in Science in District I of Antipolo City: Basis for Enhancement Model
Digitization, technology, and scientific education are strong educational reform drivers. Modern educational institutions use computers and the Internet for all their activities. It’s everywhere now. Thus, digitally printed science intervention material is crucial in schools and society. Today, digitalized printed materials are the main teaching and learning channel. The Philippine Department of Education (DepEd) uses extracurricular activities to help students who struggle in science, technology, and other subjects. Educators, administrators, and curriculum planners use digitally enhanced printed materials and multimedia instructions to develop every aspect of teaching and learning. This study assessed the validity and acceptability of the Digitized Printed Strategic Intervention Material (DPSIM) in teaching Science as expected against evaluation. The respondents of the study were one (1) Technology Expert, five (5) Science Administrators, and one hundred (100) Science teachers who were described in terms of position, educational attainment, training attended in ICT, teaching experiences, and the ability to handle ICT. The validity is assessed in terms of content, manner of presentation, language and style, and evaluative tools. Acceptability is assessed in terms of clarity, usefulness, suitability, adequacy, and timeliness. Various resources such as books, published studies on the net, and other materials were gathered in the construction of the research questionnaire. Descriptive Statistics such as Mean and Frequency, T-test, and ANOVA were utilized to test the statistical significance of the variables presented. Results revealed that there is no significant difference in the assessment of the two groups (expected and evaluated responses) of respondents on the validity of the Digitized Printed Strategic Intervention Material (DPSIM), but there is a significant difference in the assessment of respondents in terms of acceptability of DPSIM. When respondents were grouped according to their profile in terms of position, educational attainment, training attended in Information Communication Technology (ICT), teaching experience, and the ability to handle ICT in Teaching, it was identified that differences in the responses for validity were brought about by the respondent’s difference in ICT training attended and their ability to handle ICT in teaching. The validity of DPSIM is perceived to be a high extent, with Application, Method of Presentation, Language and Style, and Evaluative Tools as the criteria that need further improvement. For the acceptability of DPSIM, there is a significant difference in the responses when grouped according to profile. However, it is worth noting that overall, no criteria were perceived to be needing improvement. Acceptability has also been categorized to a very high extent. It concluded that the Digitized Printed Strategic Intervention Material (DPSIM) is an effective tool in teaching Science. The study included that school administrators should evaluate the DPSIM whether its contents conform to the curriculum standards. Teachers should first examine the DPSIM use to determine the contents that align with the objective of the lesson. Parents should support children with technology materials that supplement the lesson; pupils can explore the DPSIM, which promotes independent learning; and future researchers can conduct similar studies that assess developed DPSIM if the same education will be conducted in the future. Keyword: Digitized Printed Strategic Intervention Material (DPSIM)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Lived Experiences of Global Citizenship Education by Asian-Muslim Teachers Attending A Professional Development Program in the USA Lived Experiences of Police Regional Office Cordillera Personnel Charged and Suspended for Misconduct Cases Capability of the Regional Anti-Cybercrime Unit-Cordillera (Racu-Cor) in Handling Cybercrime Cases Factors Influencing Learners Discontinuation in the Alternative Learning System Combating of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing Activities Along Manila Bay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1