用于小麦产量预测的混合 ARIMA-IIS 方法:一种综合方法

Hanzala Zulfiqar, Rizwan Ahmad, Umar Shahzad
{"title":"用于小麦产量预测的混合 ARIMA-IIS 方法:一种综合方法","authors":"Hanzala Zulfiqar, Rizwan Ahmad, Umar Shahzad","doi":"10.52131/joe.2024.0601.0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the application of a hybrid approach, combining the Impulse Indicator Saturation (IIS) method with an ARIMA(x) model, to forecast wheat yield. The IIS method is employed to find potential impulse responses, which are then integrated into the ARIMA(x) framework. The IIS method captures the potential joint effects of the weather, climate and other inputs on the data generating process of the wheat yield time series. The performance of the hybrid ARIMA(x) model is compared with that of the standalone ARIMA model using various error metrics, including Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD). Additionally, model selection criteria such as the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), Schwarz Bayesian Information Criterion (SBIC), and Hannan-Quinn Criterion (HQ) are used to identify the optimal model for forecasting. The training data of wheat yield from 1948-2018 was used to fit both the ARIMA and ARIMA(x) models, while the remaining observations until 2023 are used for model validation. The results of the study reveal that the hybrid ARIMA(x) model exhibits superior forecasting ability, demonstrating lower error metrics compared to the standalone ARIMA model. Notably, the ex-ante forecasts for the 2023-24 period predict a wheat production of 29.916 million tons using the ARIMA(x) model and 29.656 million tons using the ARIMA (2,1,2) model. These findings underscore the efficacy of the hybrid approach in enhancing production forecasting accuracy, thereby serving as a valuable basis for early warning systems to address potential demand and supply gaps in wheat production.","PeriodicalId":503144,"journal":{"name":"iRASD Journal of Economics","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid ARIMA-IIS Approach for Wheat Yield Forecasting: An Integrated Approach\",\"authors\":\"Hanzala Zulfiqar, Rizwan Ahmad, Umar Shahzad\",\"doi\":\"10.52131/joe.2024.0601.0197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores the application of a hybrid approach, combining the Impulse Indicator Saturation (IIS) method with an ARIMA(x) model, to forecast wheat yield. The IIS method is employed to find potential impulse responses, which are then integrated into the ARIMA(x) framework. The IIS method captures the potential joint effects of the weather, climate and other inputs on the data generating process of the wheat yield time series. The performance of the hybrid ARIMA(x) model is compared with that of the standalone ARIMA model using various error metrics, including Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD). Additionally, model selection criteria such as the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), Schwarz Bayesian Information Criterion (SBIC), and Hannan-Quinn Criterion (HQ) are used to identify the optimal model for forecasting. The training data of wheat yield from 1948-2018 was used to fit both the ARIMA and ARIMA(x) models, while the remaining observations until 2023 are used for model validation. The results of the study reveal that the hybrid ARIMA(x) model exhibits superior forecasting ability, demonstrating lower error metrics compared to the standalone ARIMA model. Notably, the ex-ante forecasts for the 2023-24 period predict a wheat production of 29.916 million tons using the ARIMA(x) model and 29.656 million tons using the ARIMA (2,1,2) model. These findings underscore the efficacy of the hybrid approach in enhancing production forecasting accuracy, thereby serving as a valuable basis for early warning systems to address potential demand and supply gaps in wheat production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"iRASD Journal of Economics\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"iRASD Journal of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52131/joe.2024.0601.0197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iRASD Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52131/joe.2024.0601.0197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了将脉冲指标饱和(IIS)法与 ARIMA(x)模型相结合的混合方法在小麦产量预测中的应用。IIS 方法用于寻找潜在的脉冲响应,然后将其纳入 ARIMA(x) 框架。IIS 方法捕捉了天气、气候和其他输入对小麦产量时间序列数据生成过程的潜在联合影响。使用各种误差指标,包括平均平方误差 (MSE)、平均绝对百分比误差 (MAPE) 和平均绝对偏差 (MAD),比较了混合 ARIMA(x) 模型与独立 ARIMA 模型的性能。此外,模型选择标准如 Akaike 信息准则 (AIC)、贝叶斯信息准则 (BIC)、Schwarz 贝叶斯信息准则 (SBIC) 和 Hannan-Quinn 准则 (HQ) 等也用于确定预测的最佳模型。1948-2018年的小麦产量训练数据被用于拟合ARIMA模型和ARIMA(x)模型,而直到2023年的其余观测数据被用于模型验证。研究结果表明,与独立的 ARIMA 模型相比,混合 ARIMA(x)模型表现出更优越的预测能力,误差指标更低。值得注意的是,对 2023-24 年期间的事前预测,使用 ARIMA(x)模型预测的小麦产量为 2991.6 万吨,使用 ARIMA(2,1,2)模型预测的小麦产量为 2965.6 万吨。这些发现强调了混合方法在提高产量预测准确性方面的功效,从而为预警系统解决小麦生产中潜在的供需缺口提供了宝贵的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hybrid ARIMA-IIS Approach for Wheat Yield Forecasting: An Integrated Approach
This study explores the application of a hybrid approach, combining the Impulse Indicator Saturation (IIS) method with an ARIMA(x) model, to forecast wheat yield. The IIS method is employed to find potential impulse responses, which are then integrated into the ARIMA(x) framework. The IIS method captures the potential joint effects of the weather, climate and other inputs on the data generating process of the wheat yield time series. The performance of the hybrid ARIMA(x) model is compared with that of the standalone ARIMA model using various error metrics, including Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD). Additionally, model selection criteria such as the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), Schwarz Bayesian Information Criterion (SBIC), and Hannan-Quinn Criterion (HQ) are used to identify the optimal model for forecasting. The training data of wheat yield from 1948-2018 was used to fit both the ARIMA and ARIMA(x) models, while the remaining observations until 2023 are used for model validation. The results of the study reveal that the hybrid ARIMA(x) model exhibits superior forecasting ability, demonstrating lower error metrics compared to the standalone ARIMA model. Notably, the ex-ante forecasts for the 2023-24 period predict a wheat production of 29.916 million tons using the ARIMA(x) model and 29.656 million tons using the ARIMA (2,1,2) model. These findings underscore the efficacy of the hybrid approach in enhancing production forecasting accuracy, thereby serving as a valuable basis for early warning systems to address potential demand and supply gaps in wheat production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prospective Analysis of Economic and Social Development Through Special Economic Zones (SEZs): Pakistan a Case in Point Hybrid ARIMA-IIS Approach for Wheat Yield Forecasting: An Integrated Approach Empowering Women through Financial Inclusion and Governance: Evidence from 30 Developing Economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1