法律如何解决算法偏见在医疗保健领域的影响?

LSE Law Review Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.61315/lselr.651
Zoya
{"title":"法律如何解决算法偏见在医疗保健领域的影响?","authors":"Zoya","doi":"10.61315/lselr.651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines how UK ‘hard laws’ can adapt to regulate algorithmic bias in the healthcare context. I explore the causes of algorithmic bias which sets the foundation for how the law will address this issue. I critically analyse elements of the tort of negligence, the Equality Act 2010, and the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 which reveal the inadequacies of these frameworks in their application to algorithmic bias. Following this, I make recommendations on how the law can adjust to ensure that algorithms do not perpetuate existing biases and discriminate against patients. This paper acknowledges that addressing algorithmic bias will involve a mixture of hard and soft law measures, but in the final section, it will be argued that urgent systemic change (data sharing and workplace diversity) is also needed to enable the law to address the effects of algorithmic bias in the healthcare context.","PeriodicalId":514338,"journal":{"name":"LSE Law Review","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Can the Law Address the Effects of Algorithmic Bias in the Healthcare Context?\",\"authors\":\"Zoya\",\"doi\":\"10.61315/lselr.651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines how UK ‘hard laws’ can adapt to regulate algorithmic bias in the healthcare context. I explore the causes of algorithmic bias which sets the foundation for how the law will address this issue. I critically analyse elements of the tort of negligence, the Equality Act 2010, and the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 which reveal the inadequacies of these frameworks in their application to algorithmic bias. Following this, I make recommendations on how the law can adjust to ensure that algorithms do not perpetuate existing biases and discriminate against patients. This paper acknowledges that addressing algorithmic bias will involve a mixture of hard and soft law measures, but in the final section, it will be argued that urgent systemic change (data sharing and workplace diversity) is also needed to enable the law to address the effects of algorithmic bias in the healthcare context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":514338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSE Law Review\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSE Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61315/lselr.651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSE Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61315/lselr.651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了英国的 "硬性法律 "如何适应医疗保健领域的算法偏见。我探讨了算法偏见的原因,为法律如何解决这一问题奠定了基础。我批判性地分析了《过失侵权法》、《2010 年平等法》和《2002 年医疗设备法规》的内容,揭示了这些框架在应用于算法偏见时的不足之处。随后,我就如何调整法律以确保算法不会延续现有偏见和歧视患者提出了建议。本文承认,解决算法偏见问题将涉及硬法和软法措施的结合,但在最后一部分,本文将论证还需要迫切的系统性变革(数据共享和工作场所多样性),以使法律能够解决算法偏见在医疗保健领域的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Can the Law Address the Effects of Algorithmic Bias in the Healthcare Context?
This paper examines how UK ‘hard laws’ can adapt to regulate algorithmic bias in the healthcare context. I explore the causes of algorithmic bias which sets the foundation for how the law will address this issue. I critically analyse elements of the tort of negligence, the Equality Act 2010, and the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 which reveal the inadequacies of these frameworks in their application to algorithmic bias. Following this, I make recommendations on how the law can adjust to ensure that algorithms do not perpetuate existing biases and discriminate against patients. This paper acknowledges that addressing algorithmic bias will involve a mixture of hard and soft law measures, but in the final section, it will be argued that urgent systemic change (data sharing and workplace diversity) is also needed to enable the law to address the effects of algorithmic bias in the healthcare context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Licensee Called - He Wants His Peace Back! Fighting for IP Equity: A Zoom on the Forthcoming Who Pandemic Agreement Complicating the Comparative Taxonomy: the Impact on Corporate Governance of the Dynamic Interaction of Creditors and Shareholders Couzens and Carrick – Whole Life Orders for Police Officers after R v Couzens [2022] EWCA Crim 1063 How Can the Law Address the Effects of Algorithmic Bias in the Healthcare Context?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1