{"title":"大麻素对溃疡性结肠炎的治疗效果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析","authors":"Rajesh Kumar, Shruti Singh, V. Maharshi","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.20241041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to ascertain the efficacy and safety of Cannabis in treating ulcerative colitis (UC).Material and Methods: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in three databases (PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct) was performed; from inception till 31st July 2023, so as to ascertain the efficacy and safety of Cannabis in UC. Primary outcomes included: disease activity and endoscopic indices, and quality of life (QOL). The risk of bias in the studies was assessed via the RoB2 tool.Results: In total 1,928 records identified; of which four were eligible for inclusion. The risk of bias in the included studies was moderate. The patients were randomized to the cannabinoid group had significantly improved disease activity indices (standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) (-2.89 to 0.67); I2=74%) and QOL (SMD -1.70; 95% CI (0.24 to 3.17); I2=75%) than those in the placebo group. However, cannabinoids did not have a significant impact on endoscopic indices (SMD -0.40; 95% CI (-0.92 to 0.11); I2=0%) nor C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (SMD -0.49; 95% CI (-0.87 to 1.85); I2=85%) of UC patients.Conclusion: Cannabinoids show potential in improving disease activity and QOL; however, their impact on endoscopic indices and CRP levels remains inconclusive.","PeriodicalId":36211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic Effects of Cannabinoids on Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials\",\"authors\":\"Rajesh Kumar, Shruti Singh, V. Maharshi\",\"doi\":\"10.31584/jhsmr.20241041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to ascertain the efficacy and safety of Cannabis in treating ulcerative colitis (UC).Material and Methods: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in three databases (PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct) was performed; from inception till 31st July 2023, so as to ascertain the efficacy and safety of Cannabis in UC. Primary outcomes included: disease activity and endoscopic indices, and quality of life (QOL). The risk of bias in the studies was assessed via the RoB2 tool.Results: In total 1,928 records identified; of which four were eligible for inclusion. The risk of bias in the included studies was moderate. The patients were randomized to the cannabinoid group had significantly improved disease activity indices (standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) (-2.89 to 0.67); I2=74%) and QOL (SMD -1.70; 95% CI (0.24 to 3.17); I2=75%) than those in the placebo group. However, cannabinoids did not have a significant impact on endoscopic indices (SMD -0.40; 95% CI (-0.92 to 0.11); I2=0%) nor C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (SMD -0.49; 95% CI (-0.87 to 1.85); I2=85%) of UC patients.Conclusion: Cannabinoids show potential in improving disease activity and QOL; however, their impact on endoscopic indices and CRP levels remains inconclusive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在对大麻治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性进行荟萃分析:本研究旨在进行一项荟萃分析,以确定大麻治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的有效性和安全性:对三个数据库(PubMed、Google Scholar 和 Science Direct)中收录的随机对照试验(RCTs)进行荟萃分析,分析时间从开始至 2023 年 7 月 31 日,以确定大麻治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性。主要结果包括:疾病活动和内窥镜指数以及生活质量(QOL)。研究的偏倚风险通过 RoB2 工具进行评估:共发现 1,928 条记录,其中 4 条符合纳入条件。纳入研究的偏倚风险为中度。与安慰剂组相比,随机分配到大麻素组的患者疾病活动指数(标准化平均差(SMD)-1.78;95% 置信区间(CI)(-2.89 至 0.67);I2=74%)和 QOL(SMD-1.70;95% CI(0.24 至 3.17);I2=75%)均有明显改善。然而,大麻素对UC患者的内窥镜指数(SMD -0.40;95% CI (-0.92 to 0.11);I2=0%)和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平(SMD -0.49;95% CI (-0.87 to 1.85);I2=85%)没有显著影响:结论:大麻素在改善疾病活动和生活质量方面显示出潜力;但其对内窥镜指数和CRP水平的影响仍不确定。
Therapeutic Effects of Cannabinoids on Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Objective: This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to ascertain the efficacy and safety of Cannabis in treating ulcerative colitis (UC).Material and Methods: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in three databases (PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct) was performed; from inception till 31st July 2023, so as to ascertain the efficacy and safety of Cannabis in UC. Primary outcomes included: disease activity and endoscopic indices, and quality of life (QOL). The risk of bias in the studies was assessed via the RoB2 tool.Results: In total 1,928 records identified; of which four were eligible for inclusion. The risk of bias in the included studies was moderate. The patients were randomized to the cannabinoid group had significantly improved disease activity indices (standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) (-2.89 to 0.67); I2=74%) and QOL (SMD -1.70; 95% CI (0.24 to 3.17); I2=75%) than those in the placebo group. However, cannabinoids did not have a significant impact on endoscopic indices (SMD -0.40; 95% CI (-0.92 to 0.11); I2=0%) nor C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (SMD -0.49; 95% CI (-0.87 to 1.85); I2=85%) of UC patients.Conclusion: Cannabinoids show potential in improving disease activity and QOL; however, their impact on endoscopic indices and CRP levels remains inconclusive.