放大获取:非处方助听器使用一年后的进展情况

Laura Coco
{"title":"放大获取:非处方助听器使用一年后的进展情况","authors":"Laura Coco","doi":"10.1044/2024_persp-23-00279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n A number of barriers exist that limit access to hearing aids and services, including high cost, limited number of providers, and patients' perceived lack of need. The traditional model of hearing aid service delivery requires patients to undergo a hearing test, receive a medical evaluation or waiver, and receive a hearing aid fitting from qualified providers, such as a licensed audiologist. In an effort to improve access and affordability, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently established a new category of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids for adults with perceived mild–moderate hearing loss that can be purchased without the involvement of a professional. The purpose of this Viewpoint article is to reflect on the progress that has been accomplished in the inaugural year of OTC hearing aids.\n \n \n \n In the last year, hearing aids have become more readily available to consumers online and in stores. A number of companies have entered the OTC hearing aid market, leading to innovative designs and a variety of options for consumers. The regulations governing OTC hearing aids have also spurred increased attention on hearing care and created new opportunities for interprofessional collaboration. In addition, research has illustrated the real-world effectiveness of OTC hearing aids. Still, in some respects, the first year of OTC hearing aids has not met expectations. Evidence points to low adoption as well as misconceptions, including regarding the distinction between OTC and prescription hearing aids. Audiologists can play an important role in addressing misconceptions by increasing their own knowledge of the devices and talking about them with patients and in outreach activities. There are a number of outstanding needs, including to investigate U.S. consumers' satisfaction when using these devices long term and to evaluate the impact of OTC hearing aids in countries outside of the United States.\n","PeriodicalId":74424,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amplifying Access: Progress After 1 Year of Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids\",\"authors\":\"Laura Coco\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2024_persp-23-00279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n A number of barriers exist that limit access to hearing aids and services, including high cost, limited number of providers, and patients' perceived lack of need. The traditional model of hearing aid service delivery requires patients to undergo a hearing test, receive a medical evaluation or waiver, and receive a hearing aid fitting from qualified providers, such as a licensed audiologist. In an effort to improve access and affordability, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently established a new category of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids for adults with perceived mild–moderate hearing loss that can be purchased without the involvement of a professional. The purpose of this Viewpoint article is to reflect on the progress that has been accomplished in the inaugural year of OTC hearing aids.\\n \\n \\n \\n In the last year, hearing aids have become more readily available to consumers online and in stores. A number of companies have entered the OTC hearing aid market, leading to innovative designs and a variety of options for consumers. The regulations governing OTC hearing aids have also spurred increased attention on hearing care and created new opportunities for interprofessional collaboration. In addition, research has illustrated the real-world effectiveness of OTC hearing aids. Still, in some respects, the first year of OTC hearing aids has not met expectations. Evidence points to low adoption as well as misconceptions, including regarding the distinction between OTC and prescription hearing aids. Audiologists can play an important role in addressing misconceptions by increasing their own knowledge of the devices and talking about them with patients and in outreach activities. There are a number of outstanding needs, including to investigate U.S. consumers' satisfaction when using these devices long term and to evaluate the impact of OTC hearing aids in countries outside of the United States.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":74424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-23-00279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-23-00279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前存在的一些障碍限制了人们获得助听器和服务,包括高昂的费用、有限的服务提供者以及患者认为没有必要。提供助听器服务的传统模式要求患者接受听力测试,接受医疗评估或豁免,并从合格的医疗服务提供者(如有执照的听力学家)处接受助听器验配。为了提高患者的可及性和经济承受能力,美国食品和药物管理局最近为轻度-中度听力损失的成人设立了一个新的非处方(OTC)助听器类别,患者可以在没有专业人员参与的情况下购买。本篇 "视点 "文章的目的是回顾 OTC 助听器诞生一年来所取得的进展。 在过去的一年里,助听器在网上和商店里更容易被消费者买到。许多公司已进入非处方药助听器市场,为消费者带来了创新设计和多种选择。非处方药助听器的管理条例也促使人们更加关注听力保健,并为跨专业合作创造了新的机会。此外,研究也证明了非处方助听器在现实世界中的有效性。尽管如此,在某些方面,非处方助听器第一年的表现并不尽如人意。有证据表明,非处方药助听器的采用率很低,而且存在误解,包括对非处方药助听器和处方助听器之间区别的误解。听力学家在消除误解方面可以发挥重要作用,他们可以增加自己对助听器的了解,并与患者和外展活动谈论助听器。目前仍有许多需求有待满足,包括调查美国消费者长期使用这些设备的满意度,以及评估非处方药助听器在美国以外国家的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Amplifying Access: Progress After 1 Year of Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids
A number of barriers exist that limit access to hearing aids and services, including high cost, limited number of providers, and patients' perceived lack of need. The traditional model of hearing aid service delivery requires patients to undergo a hearing test, receive a medical evaluation or waiver, and receive a hearing aid fitting from qualified providers, such as a licensed audiologist. In an effort to improve access and affordability, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently established a new category of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids for adults with perceived mild–moderate hearing loss that can be purchased without the involvement of a professional. The purpose of this Viewpoint article is to reflect on the progress that has been accomplished in the inaugural year of OTC hearing aids. In the last year, hearing aids have become more readily available to consumers online and in stores. A number of companies have entered the OTC hearing aid market, leading to innovative designs and a variety of options for consumers. The regulations governing OTC hearing aids have also spurred increased attention on hearing care and created new opportunities for interprofessional collaboration. In addition, research has illustrated the real-world effectiveness of OTC hearing aids. Still, in some respects, the first year of OTC hearing aids has not met expectations. Evidence points to low adoption as well as misconceptions, including regarding the distinction between OTC and prescription hearing aids. Audiologists can play an important role in addressing misconceptions by increasing their own knowledge of the devices and talking about them with patients and in outreach activities. There are a number of outstanding needs, including to investigate U.S. consumers' satisfaction when using these devices long term and to evaluate the impact of OTC hearing aids in countries outside of the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Some Challenging Questions About Outcomes in Children With Cochlear Implants. A Case Study of Suspected Childhood Apraxia of Sign. Promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences Shared Book Reading Experiences for Young Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems Recommendations for Expanding the Clinical Role of Audiologists in Hospitals in Mainland China: Insights From a Survey-Based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1