L. Martinez-Verbo, L. Villanueva, P. Llinàs-Arias, C. García-Prieto, D. Piñeyro, A. Oliver-Caldés, A. García-Ortiz, A. Valeri, C. F. de Larrea, J. Martínez-López, Gerardo Ferrer, Manel Esteller
{"title":"摘要 P22:PVR(CD155)的表观遗传学状态介导多发性骨髓瘤的采纳细胞疗法和抗 TIGIT 反应","authors":"L. Martinez-Verbo, L. Villanueva, P. Llinàs-Arias, C. García-Prieto, D. Piñeyro, A. Oliver-Caldés, A. García-Ortiz, A. Valeri, C. F. de Larrea, J. Martínez-López, Gerardo Ferrer, Manel Esteller","doi":"10.1158/2643-3249.bcdsymp24-p22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n DNA promoter methylation acts as a key regulator for gene expression and is deeply altered in tumorigenesis. In the context of tumor clearance, cytotoxic cells (i.e. T and NK cells) play a critical role. Their function is mainly controlled by immune checkpoint (IC) synapse events, where known inhibitory markers are detrimental for cytotoxic activation. TIGIT, an inhibitory receptor on immune cells, interacts with PVR on malignant cells, precluding recognition and clearance. Multiple Myeloma (MM) remains and incurable disease and represents 10% of all hematological malignancies. In this project, we have proved PVR is regulated by promoter methylation and the importance of PVR/TIGIT axis inhibition on current immunotherapeutic options for MM. Studying newly diagnosed MM patients (n=793) we observed that higher expression of PVR is associated with shorter overall survival (median overall survival of PVR high: 56 months; PVR low: not reached; Log-rank P<0.001). In silico analysis of the promoter region of PVR, suggested its regulation by DNA methylation, so we characterized the epigenetic regulation of PVR at DNA, RNA and protein levels on a panel of MM cell lines (two methylated: AMO-1, KMS-12_BM and four unmethylated: EJM, JJN-3, MM.1S and RPMI-8226) and validated its epigenetic regulation. We cocultured cytotoxic cells with PVR unmethylated (expressing) models as well as PVR depleted ones. This depletion was obtained by shRNA interference and at least four different donors were evaluated in all the coculture experiments. Three different cell lines (EJM, JJN-3 and RPMI-8226) were tested and all expressing controls showed resistance to cytotoxicity (Mann-Whitney P<0.05). To validate the PVR/TIGIT role, we incorporated 10μg/ml of neutralizing anti-TIGIT into the system. We observed an increase in cytotoxicity in the expressing models as observed in the depleted models (Mann-Whitney P<0.05). We then tested PVR/TIGIT effect on anti-BCMA/CD3 BiTE, anti-BCMA (ARI0002h) CAR-T, and anti-BCMA (ARI0002h) CAR-NK cells. In the presence of BiTE, PVR depletion had a significant impact on cytotoxicity (Mann-Whitney P<0.05) when compared to controls. Coculturing CAR-T cells and MM models showed similar effects (Mann-Whitney P<0.05). As for CAR-NK coculture, only depleting PVR on RPMI-8226 showed a significant increase in cytotoxicity (Mann-Whitney P=0.01) when compared with the control, whereas JJN-3 remained unaffected. In summary, in the context of MM, PVR's expression is regulated by its promoter region's methylation status. Expression of PVR effectively reduces cytotoxic cell response, and the addition of anti-TIGIT validated that the PVR cytotoxic cell inhibition is mediated by TIGIT interaction. Furthermore, immunotherapies benefit from PVR depletion. Finally, PVR/TIGIT interaction seems to impact patients treated with current therapies since their outcome correlates with PVR expression. These results warrant further investigation on PVR as a biomarker and target for novel immunotherapies.\n Citation Format: Laura Martinez-Verbo, Lorea Villanueva, Pere Llinàs-Arias, Carlos A. García-Prieto, David Piñeyro, Aina Oliver-Caldes, Almudena García-Ortiz, Antonio Valeri, Carlos Fernández de Larrea, Joaquín Martínez-López, Gerardo Ferrer, Manel Esteller. PVR (CD155) epigenetic status mediates adoptive cell therapy and anti-TIGIT response in Multiple Myeloma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Blood Cancer Discovery Symposium; 2024 Mar 4-6; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Blood Cancer Discov 2024;5(2_Suppl):Abstract nr P22.","PeriodicalId":29944,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Discovery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract P22: PVR (CD155) epigenetic status mediates adoptive cell therapy and anti-TIGIT response in Multiple Myeloma\",\"authors\":\"L. Martinez-Verbo, L. Villanueva, P. Llinàs-Arias, C. García-Prieto, D. Piñeyro, A. Oliver-Caldés, A. García-Ortiz, A. Valeri, C. F. de Larrea, J. Martínez-López, Gerardo Ferrer, Manel Esteller\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/2643-3249.bcdsymp24-p22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n DNA promoter methylation acts as a key regulator for gene expression and is deeply altered in tumorigenesis. In the context of tumor clearance, cytotoxic cells (i.e. T and NK cells) play a critical role. Their function is mainly controlled by immune checkpoint (IC) synapse events, where known inhibitory markers are detrimental for cytotoxic activation. TIGIT, an inhibitory receptor on immune cells, interacts with PVR on malignant cells, precluding recognition and clearance. Multiple Myeloma (MM) remains and incurable disease and represents 10% of all hematological malignancies. In this project, we have proved PVR is regulated by promoter methylation and the importance of PVR/TIGIT axis inhibition on current immunotherapeutic options for MM. Studying newly diagnosed MM patients (n=793) we observed that higher expression of PVR is associated with shorter overall survival (median overall survival of PVR high: 56 months; PVR low: not reached; Log-rank P<0.001). In silico analysis of the promoter region of PVR, suggested its regulation by DNA methylation, so we characterized the epigenetic regulation of PVR at DNA, RNA and protein levels on a panel of MM cell lines (two methylated: AMO-1, KMS-12_BM and four unmethylated: EJM, JJN-3, MM.1S and RPMI-8226) and validated its epigenetic regulation. We cocultured cytotoxic cells with PVR unmethylated (expressing) models as well as PVR depleted ones. This depletion was obtained by shRNA interference and at least four different donors were evaluated in all the coculture experiments. Three different cell lines (EJM, JJN-3 and RPMI-8226) were tested and all expressing controls showed resistance to cytotoxicity (Mann-Whitney P<0.05). To validate the PVR/TIGIT role, we incorporated 10μg/ml of neutralizing anti-TIGIT into the system. We observed an increase in cytotoxicity in the expressing models as observed in the depleted models (Mann-Whitney P<0.05). We then tested PVR/TIGIT effect on anti-BCMA/CD3 BiTE, anti-BCMA (ARI0002h) CAR-T, and anti-BCMA (ARI0002h) CAR-NK cells. In the presence of BiTE, PVR depletion had a significant impact on cytotoxicity (Mann-Whitney P<0.05) when compared to controls. Coculturing CAR-T cells and MM models showed similar effects (Mann-Whitney P<0.05). As for CAR-NK coculture, only depleting PVR on RPMI-8226 showed a significant increase in cytotoxicity (Mann-Whitney P=0.01) when compared with the control, whereas JJN-3 remained unaffected. In summary, in the context of MM, PVR's expression is regulated by its promoter region's methylation status. Expression of PVR effectively reduces cytotoxic cell response, and the addition of anti-TIGIT validated that the PVR cytotoxic cell inhibition is mediated by TIGIT interaction. Furthermore, immunotherapies benefit from PVR depletion. Finally, PVR/TIGIT interaction seems to impact patients treated with current therapies since their outcome correlates with PVR expression. These results warrant further investigation on PVR as a biomarker and target for novel immunotherapies.\\n Citation Format: Laura Martinez-Verbo, Lorea Villanueva, Pere Llinàs-Arias, Carlos A. García-Prieto, David Piñeyro, Aina Oliver-Caldes, Almudena García-Ortiz, Antonio Valeri, Carlos Fernández de Larrea, Joaquín Martínez-López, Gerardo Ferrer, Manel Esteller. PVR (CD155) epigenetic status mediates adoptive cell therapy and anti-TIGIT response in Multiple Myeloma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Blood Cancer Discovery Symposium; 2024 Mar 4-6; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Blood Cancer Discov 2024;5(2_Suppl):Abstract nr P22.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Cancer Discovery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Cancer Discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/2643-3249.bcdsymp24-p22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/2643-3249.bcdsymp24-p22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
DNA 启动子甲基化是基因表达的关键调节因子,在肿瘤发生过程中会发生深刻变化。在清除肿瘤的过程中,细胞毒性细胞(即 T 细胞和 NK 细胞)发挥着至关重要的作用。它们的功能主要受免疫检查点(IC)突触事件的控制,其中已知的抑制性标记物不利于细胞毒性的激活。TIGIT是免疫细胞上的一种抑制性受体,它与恶性细胞上的PVR相互作用,阻碍识别和清除。多发性骨髓瘤(MM)仍然是一种无法治愈的疾病,占所有血液恶性肿瘤的 10%。在该项目中,我们证明了 PVR 受启动子甲基化调控,以及抑制 PVR/TIGIT 轴对当前 MM 免疫治疗方案的重要性。通过研究新诊断的 MM 患者(793 人),我们发现 PVR 的高表达与较短的总生存期相关(PVR 高的中位总生存期:56 个月;PVR 低的:未达到;Log-rank P<0.001)。对 PVR 启动子区域的硅学分析表明,PVR 受 DNA 甲基化的调控,因此我们在一组 MM 细胞系(两种甲基化细胞系:AMO-1、KMS-12_MM-1 和 KMS-12_MM-1)中对 PVR 在 DNA、RNA 和蛋白质水平的表观遗传调控进行了表征:AMO-1、KMS-12_BM 和四个未甲基化细胞系:EJM、JJN-3、MM.1S 和 RPMI-8226),并验证了其表观遗传调控。我们将细胞毒性细胞与 PVR 未甲基化(表达)模型和 PVR 缺失模型进行了共培养。这种缺失是通过 shRNA 干扰获得的,在所有共培养实验中至少评估了四种不同的供体。测试了三种不同的细胞系(EJM、JJN-3 和 RPMI-8226),所有表达对照都显示出细胞毒性抵抗力(Mann-Whitney P<0.05)。为了验证 PVR/TIGIT 的作用,我们在系统中加入了 10μg/ml 的中和性抗 TIGIT。我们在表达模型中观察到细胞毒性的增加,与在耗竭模型中观察到的相同(Mann-Whitney P<0.05)。然后,我们测试了 PVR/TIGIT 对抗 BCMA/CD3 BiTE、抗 BCMA (ARI0002h) CAR-T 和抗 BCMA (ARI0002h) CAR-NK 细胞的影响。与对照组相比,在存在 BiTE 的情况下,PVR 的耗竭对细胞毒性有显著影响(Mann-Whitney P<0.05)。CAR-T 细胞与 MM 模型的共培养显示出相似的效果(Mann-Whitney P<0.05)。至于 CAR-NK 共培养,与对照组相比,只有在 RPMI-8226 上消耗 PVR 才会显示细胞毒性显著增加(Mann-Whitney P=0.01),而 JJN-3 则不受影响。总之,在 MM 中,PVR 的表达受其启动子区域甲基化状态的调控。PVR 的表达能有效降低细胞毒性反应,而抗 TIGIT 的加入则验证了 PVR 的细胞毒性细胞抑制作用是由 TIGIT 相互作用介导的。此外,免疫疗法也能从 PVR 的消耗中获益。最后,PVR/TIGIT 相互作用似乎会影响接受现有疗法的患者,因为他们的治疗结果与 PVR 表达相关。这些结果值得进一步研究作为生物标记物和新型免疫疗法靶点的 PVR。引用格式:Laura Martinez-Verbo、Lorea Villanueva、Pere Llinàs-Arias、Carlos A. García-Prieto、David Piñeyro、Aina Oliver-Caldes、Almudena García-Ortiz、Antonio Valeri、Carlos Fernández de Larrea、Joaquín Martínez-López、Gerardo Ferrer、Manel Esteller。PVR(CD155)的表观遗传学状态介导多发性骨髓瘤的采纳细胞疗法和抗TIGIT反应[摘要]。见:血癌发现研讨会论文集》,2024 年 3 月 4-6 日,马萨诸塞州波士顿。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Blood Cancer Discov 2024;5(2_Suppl):Abstract nr P22.
Abstract P22: PVR (CD155) epigenetic status mediates adoptive cell therapy and anti-TIGIT response in Multiple Myeloma
DNA promoter methylation acts as a key regulator for gene expression and is deeply altered in tumorigenesis. In the context of tumor clearance, cytotoxic cells (i.e. T and NK cells) play a critical role. Their function is mainly controlled by immune checkpoint (IC) synapse events, where known inhibitory markers are detrimental for cytotoxic activation. TIGIT, an inhibitory receptor on immune cells, interacts with PVR on malignant cells, precluding recognition and clearance. Multiple Myeloma (MM) remains and incurable disease and represents 10% of all hematological malignancies. In this project, we have proved PVR is regulated by promoter methylation and the importance of PVR/TIGIT axis inhibition on current immunotherapeutic options for MM. Studying newly diagnosed MM patients (n=793) we observed that higher expression of PVR is associated with shorter overall survival (median overall survival of PVR high: 56 months; PVR low: not reached; Log-rank P<0.001). In silico analysis of the promoter region of PVR, suggested its regulation by DNA methylation, so we characterized the epigenetic regulation of PVR at DNA, RNA and protein levels on a panel of MM cell lines (two methylated: AMO-1, KMS-12_BM and four unmethylated: EJM, JJN-3, MM.1S and RPMI-8226) and validated its epigenetic regulation. We cocultured cytotoxic cells with PVR unmethylated (expressing) models as well as PVR depleted ones. This depletion was obtained by shRNA interference and at least four different donors were evaluated in all the coculture experiments. Three different cell lines (EJM, JJN-3 and RPMI-8226) were tested and all expressing controls showed resistance to cytotoxicity (Mann-Whitney P<0.05). To validate the PVR/TIGIT role, we incorporated 10μg/ml of neutralizing anti-TIGIT into the system. We observed an increase in cytotoxicity in the expressing models as observed in the depleted models (Mann-Whitney P<0.05). We then tested PVR/TIGIT effect on anti-BCMA/CD3 BiTE, anti-BCMA (ARI0002h) CAR-T, and anti-BCMA (ARI0002h) CAR-NK cells. In the presence of BiTE, PVR depletion had a significant impact on cytotoxicity (Mann-Whitney P<0.05) when compared to controls. Coculturing CAR-T cells and MM models showed similar effects (Mann-Whitney P<0.05). As for CAR-NK coculture, only depleting PVR on RPMI-8226 showed a significant increase in cytotoxicity (Mann-Whitney P=0.01) when compared with the control, whereas JJN-3 remained unaffected. In summary, in the context of MM, PVR's expression is regulated by its promoter region's methylation status. Expression of PVR effectively reduces cytotoxic cell response, and the addition of anti-TIGIT validated that the PVR cytotoxic cell inhibition is mediated by TIGIT interaction. Furthermore, immunotherapies benefit from PVR depletion. Finally, PVR/TIGIT interaction seems to impact patients treated with current therapies since their outcome correlates with PVR expression. These results warrant further investigation on PVR as a biomarker and target for novel immunotherapies.
Citation Format: Laura Martinez-Verbo, Lorea Villanueva, Pere Llinàs-Arias, Carlos A. García-Prieto, David Piñeyro, Aina Oliver-Caldes, Almudena García-Ortiz, Antonio Valeri, Carlos Fernández de Larrea, Joaquín Martínez-López, Gerardo Ferrer, Manel Esteller. PVR (CD155) epigenetic status mediates adoptive cell therapy and anti-TIGIT response in Multiple Myeloma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Blood Cancer Discovery Symposium; 2024 Mar 4-6; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Blood Cancer Discov 2024;5(2_Suppl):Abstract nr P22.
期刊介绍:
The journal Blood Cancer Discovery publishes high-quality Research Articles and Briefs that focus on major advances in basic, translational, and clinical research of leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma, and associated diseases. The topics covered include molecular and cellular features of pathogenesis, therapy response and relapse, transcriptional circuits, stem cells, differentiation, microenvironment, metabolism, immunity, mutagenesis, and clonal evolution. These subjects are investigated in both animal disease models and high-dimensional clinical data landscapes.
The journal also welcomes submissions on new pharmacological, biological, and living cell therapies, as well as new diagnostic tools. They are interested in prognostic, diagnostic, and pharmacodynamic biomarkers, and computational and machine learning approaches to personalized medicine. The scope of submissions ranges from preclinical proof of concept to clinical trials and real-world evidence.
Blood Cancer Discovery serves as a forum for diverse ideas that shape future research directions in hematooncology. In addition to Research Articles and Briefs, the journal also publishes Reviews, Perspectives, and Commentaries on topics of broad interest in the field.