约束压力对高压水射流辅助掘进机破岩的影响

IF 8.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Underground Space Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.undsp.2023.12.001
Chen Xu , Yujie Zhu , Xiaoli Liu , Fei Chen , Min Zhu , Enzhi Wang , Sijing Wang
{"title":"约束压力对高压水射流辅助掘进机破岩的影响","authors":"Chen Xu ,&nbsp;Yujie Zhu ,&nbsp;Xiaoli Liu ,&nbsp;Fei Chen ,&nbsp;Min Zhu ,&nbsp;Enzhi Wang ,&nbsp;Sijing Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.undsp.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High-pressure waterjet-assisted tunnel boring machine (WTBM) is an efficient method for improving the tunneling performance of a tunnel boring machine (TBM) and reducing the wear of its disc cutters in hard rock with high geostresses. Confining pressure directly affects the efficiency of rock breaking and the configuration of the disc cutters. In this study, we evaluated the effect of confining pressure on WTBM rock breaking by developing a self-designed and manufactured experimental system, including confining pressure loading, TBM disc-cutter penetration, and high-pressure waterjet. The macro fracture, acoustic emission (AE), peak normal force drop, and specific energy (SE) were analyzed for four different confining pressures (10, 20, 30, and 35 MPa). The results showed that the cutting depth of the waterjet increased linearly as the waterjet pressure increased and decreased with the gradual increase in the nozzle moving speed. The expansion and development of cracks formed rock debris, and the size of the rock fragments decreased with an increase in confining pressure. When the waterjet pressure was 280 MPa, the nozzle moving velocity was 800 mm/min and the kerf space was 75 mm, which indicated that the confining pressure, which was 23.16 MPa, minimized the cutting SE under this condition. However, regardless of the confining pressure, the maximum normal force of WTBM was less than that of a TBM, whereas the SE of WTBM was less than that of complete TBM cutting mode (CTCM). The average force drop and average drop rate of SE were approximately 25%, and 80%, respectively. The results of this study can inspire the design and mechanism of a TBM assisted by a high-pressure waterjet.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48505,"journal":{"name":"Underground Space","volume":"18 ","pages":"Pages 151-161"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000229/pdfft?md5=fb167c5ddc1b09cf05a2cf681eca1c2d&pid=1-s2.0-S2467967424000229-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of confining pressure on rock breaking by high-pressure waterjet-assisted TBM\",\"authors\":\"Chen Xu ,&nbsp;Yujie Zhu ,&nbsp;Xiaoli Liu ,&nbsp;Fei Chen ,&nbsp;Min Zhu ,&nbsp;Enzhi Wang ,&nbsp;Sijing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.undsp.2023.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>High-pressure waterjet-assisted tunnel boring machine (WTBM) is an efficient method for improving the tunneling performance of a tunnel boring machine (TBM) and reducing the wear of its disc cutters in hard rock with high geostresses. Confining pressure directly affects the efficiency of rock breaking and the configuration of the disc cutters. In this study, we evaluated the effect of confining pressure on WTBM rock breaking by developing a self-designed and manufactured experimental system, including confining pressure loading, TBM disc-cutter penetration, and high-pressure waterjet. The macro fracture, acoustic emission (AE), peak normal force drop, and specific energy (SE) were analyzed for four different confining pressures (10, 20, 30, and 35 MPa). The results showed that the cutting depth of the waterjet increased linearly as the waterjet pressure increased and decreased with the gradual increase in the nozzle moving speed. The expansion and development of cracks formed rock debris, and the size of the rock fragments decreased with an increase in confining pressure. When the waterjet pressure was 280 MPa, the nozzle moving velocity was 800 mm/min and the kerf space was 75 mm, which indicated that the confining pressure, which was 23.16 MPa, minimized the cutting SE under this condition. However, regardless of the confining pressure, the maximum normal force of WTBM was less than that of a TBM, whereas the SE of WTBM was less than that of complete TBM cutting mode (CTCM). The average force drop and average drop rate of SE were approximately 25%, and 80%, respectively. The results of this study can inspire the design and mechanism of a TBM assisted by a high-pressure waterjet.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Underground Space\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 151-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000229/pdfft?md5=fb167c5ddc1b09cf05a2cf681eca1c2d&pid=1-s2.0-S2467967424000229-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Underground Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000229\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Underground Space","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000229","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高压水射流辅助隧道掘进机(WTBM)是提高隧道掘进机(TBM)掘进性能、减少其圆盘铣刀在高地质应力硬岩中磨损的有效方法。密闭压力直接影响岩石破碎的效率和圆盘铣刀的配置。在本研究中,我们通过开发自行设计和制造的实验系统,评估了约束压力对 WTBM 破岩的影响,包括约束压力加载、TBM 圆盘铣刀穿透和高压水射流。分析了四种不同约束压力(10、20、30 和 35 兆帕)下的宏观断裂、声发射(AE)、峰值法向力下降和比能量(SE)。结果表明,水刀的切割深度随着水刀压力的增加而线性增加,随着喷嘴移动速度的逐渐增加而减小。裂缝的扩展和发展形成了岩石碎屑,岩石碎屑的大小随着约束压力的增加而减小。当水刀压力为 280 兆帕时,喷嘴移动速度为 800 毫米/分钟,切口空间为 75 毫米,这表明在此条件下,23.16 兆帕的约束压力可将切割 SE 降到最低。然而,无论约束压力如何,WTBM 的最大法向力都小于 TBM,而 WTBM 的 SE 则小于完全 TBM 切削模式(CTCM)。平均力下降率和 SE 平均下降率分别约为 25% 和 80%。该研究结果可为高压水刀辅助 TBM 的设计和机制提供启发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of confining pressure on rock breaking by high-pressure waterjet-assisted TBM

High-pressure waterjet-assisted tunnel boring machine (WTBM) is an efficient method for improving the tunneling performance of a tunnel boring machine (TBM) and reducing the wear of its disc cutters in hard rock with high geostresses. Confining pressure directly affects the efficiency of rock breaking and the configuration of the disc cutters. In this study, we evaluated the effect of confining pressure on WTBM rock breaking by developing a self-designed and manufactured experimental system, including confining pressure loading, TBM disc-cutter penetration, and high-pressure waterjet. The macro fracture, acoustic emission (AE), peak normal force drop, and specific energy (SE) were analyzed for four different confining pressures (10, 20, 30, and 35 MPa). The results showed that the cutting depth of the waterjet increased linearly as the waterjet pressure increased and decreased with the gradual increase in the nozzle moving speed. The expansion and development of cracks formed rock debris, and the size of the rock fragments decreased with an increase in confining pressure. When the waterjet pressure was 280 MPa, the nozzle moving velocity was 800 mm/min and the kerf space was 75 mm, which indicated that the confining pressure, which was 23.16 MPa, minimized the cutting SE under this condition. However, regardless of the confining pressure, the maximum normal force of WTBM was less than that of a TBM, whereas the SE of WTBM was less than that of complete TBM cutting mode (CTCM). The average force drop and average drop rate of SE were approximately 25%, and 80%, respectively. The results of this study can inspire the design and mechanism of a TBM assisted by a high-pressure waterjet.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Underground Space
Underground Space ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Underground Space is an open access international journal without article processing charges (APC) committed to serving as a scientific forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of underground engineering. The journal welcomes manuscripts that deal with original theories, methods, technologies, and important applications throughout the life-cycle of underground projects, including planning, design, operation and maintenance, disaster prevention, and demolition. The journal is particularly interested in manuscripts related to the latest development of smart underground engineering from the perspectives of resilience, resources saving, environmental friendliness, humanity, and artificial intelligence. The manuscripts are expected to have significant innovation and potential impact in the field of underground engineering, and should have clear association with or application in underground projects.
期刊最新文献
Series of centrifuge shaking table tests study on seismic response of subway station structures in soft soil sites Analysis of hydraulic breakdown and seepage of tail sealing system in shield tunnel machines Back analysis of geomechanical parameters based on a data augmentation algorithm and machine learning technique Characteristics of deformation and defect of shield tunnel in coastal structured soil in China Numerical analysis of a deep and oversized group excavation: A case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1