机构和散户投资者在信息冲击下的信息获取和处理能力

IF 2.1 2区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Empirical Finance Pub Date : 2024-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jempfin.2024.101495
Scott Fung , Khaled Obaid , Shih-Chuan Tsai
{"title":"机构和散户投资者在信息冲击下的信息获取和处理能力","authors":"Scott Fung ,&nbsp;Khaled Obaid ,&nbsp;Shih-Chuan Tsai","doi":"10.1016/j.jempfin.2024.101495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using audit trail data from the Taiwan Stock Exchange, this paper compares the trading skill of institutions and individuals around information shocks. We find suggestive evidence that institutions possess information acquisition and processing advantages over individuals. Specifically, net buying done by institutions (individuals) prior to and during jumps positively (negatively) predicts future intraday returns. This predictive relation is strongest among stocks with high limits to arbitrage and a limited information environment. Moreover, domestic institutions generate higher trading profits than foreign institutions. Unlike domestic institutions, the information acquisition and processing advantages of foreign institutions prevail across different sources of price jumps, such as prescheduled events and macroeconomic news. Prescheduled events and news lessen the information disadvantages for individuals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Finance","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 101495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539824000306/pdfft?md5=af9135a1f75ddd3d3bce98945d62d830&pid=1-s2.0-S0927539824000306-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information acquisition and processing skills of institutions and retail investors around information shocks\",\"authors\":\"Scott Fung ,&nbsp;Khaled Obaid ,&nbsp;Shih-Chuan Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jempfin.2024.101495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using audit trail data from the Taiwan Stock Exchange, this paper compares the trading skill of institutions and individuals around information shocks. We find suggestive evidence that institutions possess information acquisition and processing advantages over individuals. Specifically, net buying done by institutions (individuals) prior to and during jumps positively (negatively) predicts future intraday returns. This predictive relation is strongest among stocks with high limits to arbitrage and a limited information environment. Moreover, domestic institutions generate higher trading profits than foreign institutions. Unlike domestic institutions, the information acquisition and processing advantages of foreign institutions prevail across different sources of price jumps, such as prescheduled events and macroeconomic news. Prescheduled events and news lessen the information disadvantages for individuals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Empirical Finance\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539824000306/pdfft?md5=af9135a1f75ddd3d3bce98945d62d830&pid=1-s2.0-S0927539824000306-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Empirical Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539824000306\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Empirical Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539824000306","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文利用台湾证券交易所的审计跟踪数据,比较了机构和个人在信息冲击下的交易技能。我们发现了一些暗示性的证据,表明机构比个人更具信息获取和处理优势。具体地说,机构(个人)在跳空之前和期间的净买入可以正面(负面)预测未来的盘中回报。这种预测关系在套利限制较高、信息环境有限的股票中最强。此外,国内机构的交易利润高于国外机构。与国内机构不同的是,国外机构的信息获取和处理优势在不同的价格跳动来源(如预设事件和宏观经济新闻)中都占优势。预先安排的事件和新闻减少了个人的信息劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Information acquisition and processing skills of institutions and retail investors around information shocks

Using audit trail data from the Taiwan Stock Exchange, this paper compares the trading skill of institutions and individuals around information shocks. We find suggestive evidence that institutions possess information acquisition and processing advantages over individuals. Specifically, net buying done by institutions (individuals) prior to and during jumps positively (negatively) predicts future intraday returns. This predictive relation is strongest among stocks with high limits to arbitrage and a limited information environment. Moreover, domestic institutions generate higher trading profits than foreign institutions. Unlike domestic institutions, the information acquisition and processing advantages of foreign institutions prevail across different sources of price jumps, such as prescheduled events and macroeconomic news. Prescheduled events and news lessen the information disadvantages for individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Empirical Finance is a financial economics journal whose aim is to publish high quality articles in empirical finance. Empirical finance is interpreted broadly to include any type of empirical work in financial economics, financial econometrics, and also theoretical work with clear empirical implications, even when there is no empirical analysis. The Journal welcomes articles in all fields of finance, such as asset pricing, corporate finance, financial econometrics, banking, international finance, microstructure, behavioural finance, etc. The Editorial Team is willing to take risks on innovative research, controversial papers, and unusual approaches. We are also particularly interested in work produced by young scholars. The composition of the editorial board reflects such goals.
期刊最新文献
High-frequency realized stochastic volatility model Jump tail risk exposure and the cross-section of stock returns Time-varying variance decomposition of macro-finance term structure models Technological shocks and stock market volatility over a century Is firm-level political risk priced in the corporate bond market?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1