山地大厅和智能俱乐部:挪威城市中的紧急接待架构

IF 2.4 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Wellbeing Space and Society Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wss.2024.100189
Håvard Breivik-Khan, Peter Hemmersam
{"title":"山地大厅和智能俱乐部:挪威城市中的紧急接待架构","authors":"Håvard Breivik-Khan,&nbsp;Peter Hemmersam","doi":"10.1016/j.wss.2024.100189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Contemporary contingency planning is largely delinked from urban planning. However, the two domains intersect in critical ways. Contingency planning frames conditions for displaced persons in emergency situations but also affects the design of everyday urban spaces. Thus, the spatial output of emergency preparedness can encourage wellbeing and placemaking in both emergency and non-emergency situations. This article explores the built environments of contingency planning in Norwegian cities, paying particular attention to emergency reception.</p><p>Furthermore, this article outlines the relationship between the policies of reception in displacement management and the spatial policies of placemaking. A study of Norwegian contingency planning history shows that the former evacuation shelter typology is being replaced by the more loosely defined concept of <em>places of protection</em>, similar to the retrofitted spaces commonly used as asylum centres. Newspaper clippings and document reviews are used to study two emergency reception structures: a Cold War multipurpose mountain hall close to the Norway–Russia border and a transformed 1970s warehouse near Oslo that currently houses the Norwegian national arrival facility for asylum-seekers. Comparing these two cases outlines the interaction between displacement management, contingency planning, and urban planning and contributes to conceptualising what we call <em>contingency urbanism</em>. We suggest that contingency urbanism can be useful in re-spatialising emergency architecture, re-linking contingency and urban planning, and pointing to placemaking opportunities in the duality of everyday life and a state of emergency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52616,"journal":{"name":"Wellbeing Space and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558124000071/pdfft?md5=3e88a1aae4c3f8c5eff1d27a15469e51&pid=1-s2.0-S2666558124000071-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mountain Hall and the Smart Club: The Architecture of Emergency Reception in Norwegian Cities\",\"authors\":\"Håvard Breivik-Khan,&nbsp;Peter Hemmersam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wss.2024.100189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Contemporary contingency planning is largely delinked from urban planning. However, the two domains intersect in critical ways. Contingency planning frames conditions for displaced persons in emergency situations but also affects the design of everyday urban spaces. Thus, the spatial output of emergency preparedness can encourage wellbeing and placemaking in both emergency and non-emergency situations. This article explores the built environments of contingency planning in Norwegian cities, paying particular attention to emergency reception.</p><p>Furthermore, this article outlines the relationship between the policies of reception in displacement management and the spatial policies of placemaking. A study of Norwegian contingency planning history shows that the former evacuation shelter typology is being replaced by the more loosely defined concept of <em>places of protection</em>, similar to the retrofitted spaces commonly used as asylum centres. Newspaper clippings and document reviews are used to study two emergency reception structures: a Cold War multipurpose mountain hall close to the Norway–Russia border and a transformed 1970s warehouse near Oslo that currently houses the Norwegian national arrival facility for asylum-seekers. Comparing these two cases outlines the interaction between displacement management, contingency planning, and urban planning and contributes to conceptualising what we call <em>contingency urbanism</em>. We suggest that contingency urbanism can be useful in re-spatialising emergency architecture, re-linking contingency and urban planning, and pointing to placemaking opportunities in the duality of everyday life and a state of emergency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wellbeing Space and Society\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558124000071/pdfft?md5=3e88a1aae4c3f8c5eff1d27a15469e51&pid=1-s2.0-S2666558124000071-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wellbeing Space and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558124000071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellbeing Space and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558124000071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代应急规划在很大程度上与城市规划脱钩。然而,这两个领域却有着重要的交集。应急规划为紧急情况下的流离失所者创造条件,但也影响日常城市空间的设计。因此,应急准备的空间产出可以在紧急情况和非紧急情况下促进福祉和场所建设。此外,本文还概述了流离失所管理中的接待政策与场所营造的空间政策之间的关系。对挪威应急规划历史的研究表明,以前的疏散避难所类型正被定义更为宽泛的保护场所概念所取代,后者类似于通常用作庇护中心的改装空间。本报告利用剪报和文献综述研究了两个紧急接待机构:一个是冷战时期靠近挪威与俄罗斯边境的多功能山地大厅,另一个是20世纪70年代奥斯陆附近的一个经过改造的仓库,目前是挪威国家寻求庇护者抵达设施的所在地。对这两个案例进行比较,可以勾勒出流离失所管理、应急规划和城市规划之间的互动关系,并有助于形成我们所说的应急城市主义的概念。我们认为,应急城市主义有助于重新确定应急建筑的空间,重新将应急和城市规划联系起来,并指出日常生活和紧急状态的双重性所带来的场所营造机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Mountain Hall and the Smart Club: The Architecture of Emergency Reception in Norwegian Cities

Contemporary contingency planning is largely delinked from urban planning. However, the two domains intersect in critical ways. Contingency planning frames conditions for displaced persons in emergency situations but also affects the design of everyday urban spaces. Thus, the spatial output of emergency preparedness can encourage wellbeing and placemaking in both emergency and non-emergency situations. This article explores the built environments of contingency planning in Norwegian cities, paying particular attention to emergency reception.

Furthermore, this article outlines the relationship between the policies of reception in displacement management and the spatial policies of placemaking. A study of Norwegian contingency planning history shows that the former evacuation shelter typology is being replaced by the more loosely defined concept of places of protection, similar to the retrofitted spaces commonly used as asylum centres. Newspaper clippings and document reviews are used to study two emergency reception structures: a Cold War multipurpose mountain hall close to the Norway–Russia border and a transformed 1970s warehouse near Oslo that currently houses the Norwegian national arrival facility for asylum-seekers. Comparing these two cases outlines the interaction between displacement management, contingency planning, and urban planning and contributes to conceptualising what we call contingency urbanism. We suggest that contingency urbanism can be useful in re-spatialising emergency architecture, re-linking contingency and urban planning, and pointing to placemaking opportunities in the duality of everyday life and a state of emergency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wellbeing Space and Society
Wellbeing Space and Society Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
124 days
期刊最新文献
Neighborhood ‘double disadvantage’ and child development in inner city and growth areas “If I was in charge”: A qualitative investigation of water security, gender-based violence and wellbeing in Kenya Process and practice in New Zealand Enviroschool implementation The loss of rural vital places: A case study using the social determinants of health framework The contributions of community seed saving to health and wellbeing: A qualitative study in Thunder Bay, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1