择期开放动脉手术后当天出院

Samantha Durbin MD , Amir Azarbal MD , Enjae Jung MD , Harish Krishnamoorthi MD , Khanh Nguyen MD , Matthew C. Koopmann MD
{"title":"择期开放动脉手术后当天出院","authors":"Samantha Durbin MD ,&nbsp;Amir Azarbal MD ,&nbsp;Enjae Jung MD ,&nbsp;Harish Krishnamoorthi MD ,&nbsp;Khanh Nguyen MD ,&nbsp;Matthew C. Koopmann MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) after open peripheral arterial surgery (OAS) in a veteran population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a single-center, retrospective study. Starting September 2021, veterans who underwent elective OAS were selectively chosen for planned SDD. Eligible procedures included popliteal artery aneurysm repair, common femoral/superficial femoral/popliteal artery endarterectomy ± concurrent endovascular intervention, bypass graft revision, femoral-femoral bypass, and axillofemoral bypass. All patients who underwent eligible procedures were compared across three eras based on the primary location of postoperative admission: intensive care unit era (ICUE, September 2016-December 2018), inpatient ward era (WARDE, January 2019-August 2021), and SDD era (SDDE, September 2021-December 2022). Demographics, comorbidities, indication for procedures, operative times, complications, readmissions, and length of stay (LOS) were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ninety-nine male patients underwent eligible procedures during the 6-year study period (ICUE: 32, WARDE; 41, and SDDE: 26). ICUE had higher rates of tobacco use (<em>P</em> = .04) with no differences in age or other comorbidities between the eras. Indications were claudication, bypass graft stenosis, popliteal aneurysm, ischemic rest pain, and tissue loss. Twenty patients were selected for SDD, and 18 were successfully discharged same day. Operative times were not significantly different between the eras. SDDE patients were more likely to undergo monitored anesthesia care (<em>P</em> = .04). The mean LOS was significantly lower in SDDE (0.54 days, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) compared with WARDE (2.9 days) and ICUE (2.8 days). The mean ICU LOS was lower in SDDE (0.2 days, <em>P</em> &lt;.001) compared with ICUE (1.1 days). There was no difference in postoperative complications (<em>P</em> = .30), reoperation (<em>P</em> = .51), or readmission rates (<em>P</em> = .35).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SDD is safe and feasible after elective OAS in a veteran population with a low unplanned admission rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74034,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000126/pdfft?md5=19fc101470b7e84bf6e0b028892290cf&pid=1-s2.0-S2949912724000126-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Same-day discharge after elective open arterial surgery\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Durbin MD ,&nbsp;Amir Azarbal MD ,&nbsp;Enjae Jung MD ,&nbsp;Harish Krishnamoorthi MD ,&nbsp;Khanh Nguyen MD ,&nbsp;Matthew C. Koopmann MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) after open peripheral arterial surgery (OAS) in a veteran population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a single-center, retrospective study. Starting September 2021, veterans who underwent elective OAS were selectively chosen for planned SDD. Eligible procedures included popliteal artery aneurysm repair, common femoral/superficial femoral/popliteal artery endarterectomy ± concurrent endovascular intervention, bypass graft revision, femoral-femoral bypass, and axillofemoral bypass. All patients who underwent eligible procedures were compared across three eras based on the primary location of postoperative admission: intensive care unit era (ICUE, September 2016-December 2018), inpatient ward era (WARDE, January 2019-August 2021), and SDD era (SDDE, September 2021-December 2022). Demographics, comorbidities, indication for procedures, operative times, complications, readmissions, and length of stay (LOS) were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ninety-nine male patients underwent eligible procedures during the 6-year study period (ICUE: 32, WARDE; 41, and SDDE: 26). ICUE had higher rates of tobacco use (<em>P</em> = .04) with no differences in age or other comorbidities between the eras. Indications were claudication, bypass graft stenosis, popliteal aneurysm, ischemic rest pain, and tissue loss. Twenty patients were selected for SDD, and 18 were successfully discharged same day. Operative times were not significantly different between the eras. SDDE patients were more likely to undergo monitored anesthesia care (<em>P</em> = .04). The mean LOS was significantly lower in SDDE (0.54 days, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) compared with WARDE (2.9 days) and ICUE (2.8 days). The mean ICU LOS was lower in SDDE (0.2 days, <em>P</em> &lt;.001) compared with ICUE (1.1 days). There was no difference in postoperative complications (<em>P</em> = .30), reoperation (<em>P</em> = .51), or readmission rates (<em>P</em> = .35).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SDD is safe and feasible after elective OAS in a veteran population with a low unplanned admission rate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JVS-vascular insights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000126/pdfft?md5=19fc101470b7e84bf6e0b028892290cf&pid=1-s2.0-S2949912724000126-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JVS-vascular insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估退伍军人开放性外周动脉手术(OAS)后当天出院(SDD)的可行性。自 2021 年 9 月起,选择性地选择接受择期开放外周动脉手术的退伍军人进行计划中的 SDD。符合条件的手术包括腘动脉动脉瘤修补术、股总动脉/股浅动脉/腘动脉内膜剥脱术(同时进行血管内介入治疗)、旁路移植翻修术、股股旁路术和腋股旁路术。根据术后入院的主要地点,将所有接受合格手术的患者在三个时代进行比较:重症监护室时代(ICUE,2016 年 9 月至 2018 年 12 月)、住院病房时代(WARDE,2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 8 月)和 SDD 时代(SDDE,2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 12 月)。对人口统计学、合并症、手术指征、手术时间、并发症、再入院率和住院时间(LOS)进行了分析。结果在6年的研究期间,有99名男性患者接受了符合条件的手术(ICUE:32人,WARDE:41人,SDDE:26人)。ICUE 的烟草使用率更高(P = .04),两个时代的患者在年龄或其他合并症方面没有差异。适应症包括跛行、旁路移植狭窄、腘动脉瘤、缺血性静息痛和组织缺失。20 名患者被选中接受 SDD,其中 18 名患者在当天顺利出院。两个时代的手术时间没有明显差异。SDD患者更有可能接受监测麻醉护理(P = .04)。与WARDE(2.9天)和ICUE(2.8天)相比,SDDE的平均住院时间明显更短(0.54天,P = .001)。与 ICUE(1.1 天)相比,SDDE 的平均 ICU LOS 更低(0.2 天,P <.001)。在术后并发症(P = .30)、再次手术(P = .51)或再次入院率(P = .35)方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Same-day discharge after elective open arterial surgery

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) after open peripheral arterial surgery (OAS) in a veteran population.

Methods

This is a single-center, retrospective study. Starting September 2021, veterans who underwent elective OAS were selectively chosen for planned SDD. Eligible procedures included popliteal artery aneurysm repair, common femoral/superficial femoral/popliteal artery endarterectomy ± concurrent endovascular intervention, bypass graft revision, femoral-femoral bypass, and axillofemoral bypass. All patients who underwent eligible procedures were compared across three eras based on the primary location of postoperative admission: intensive care unit era (ICUE, September 2016-December 2018), inpatient ward era (WARDE, January 2019-August 2021), and SDD era (SDDE, September 2021-December 2022). Demographics, comorbidities, indication for procedures, operative times, complications, readmissions, and length of stay (LOS) were analyzed.

Results

Ninety-nine male patients underwent eligible procedures during the 6-year study period (ICUE: 32, WARDE; 41, and SDDE: 26). ICUE had higher rates of tobacco use (P = .04) with no differences in age or other comorbidities between the eras. Indications were claudication, bypass graft stenosis, popliteal aneurysm, ischemic rest pain, and tissue loss. Twenty patients were selected for SDD, and 18 were successfully discharged same day. Operative times were not significantly different between the eras. SDDE patients were more likely to undergo monitored anesthesia care (P = .04). The mean LOS was significantly lower in SDDE (0.54 days, P < .001) compared with WARDE (2.9 days) and ICUE (2.8 days). The mean ICU LOS was lower in SDDE (0.2 days, P <.001) compared with ICUE (1.1 days). There was no difference in postoperative complications (P = .30), reoperation (P = .51), or readmission rates (P = .35).

Conclusions

SDD is safe and feasible after elective OAS in a veteran population with a low unplanned admission rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regarding “Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and Deep Venous Interventions: Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion from SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS” An Assessment of Racial Diversity in Vascular Surgery Educational Resources The use of artificial intelligence in three-dimensional imaging modalities and diabetic foot disease – a systematic review Room for improvement in patient compliance during peripheral vascular interventions Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1