医生面对 AI(人工智能):伦理与责任

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL Medecine & Droit Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.meddro.2024.02.001
Cécile Manaouil , Sylvain Chamot , Pascal Petit
{"title":"医生面对 AI(人工智能):伦理与责任","authors":"Cécile Manaouil ,&nbsp;Sylvain Chamot ,&nbsp;Pascal Petit","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is developing at an impressive speed in the field of health. AI paves the way for new practices in diagnostic assistance, preventive medicine, individualized patient follow-up, support in choosing a therapy, assistance in interpreting the results of additional examinations, etc. Far from being a magic bullet, delegating tasks to AI raises many ethical questions relating in particular to the supervision of algorithms, equal access to innovation and the use of patient data. It is still difficult to predict whether AI will remain a “safety net” for the doctor or if it will supplant him. France and Europe have laid down the principle of “human guarantee” in the interpretation of diagnostic and therapeutic results, implying that the machine cannot act alone and enshrining the responsibility of the health professional. This article aims to understand how complex AI is to regulate legally at the risk of neglecting its secrecy, whether at the individual or collective level.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2024 186","pages":"Pages 50-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le médecin confronté à l’IA (Intelligence artificielle) : Éthique et responsabilité\",\"authors\":\"Cécile Manaouil ,&nbsp;Sylvain Chamot ,&nbsp;Pascal Petit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meddro.2024.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is developing at an impressive speed in the field of health. AI paves the way for new practices in diagnostic assistance, preventive medicine, individualized patient follow-up, support in choosing a therapy, assistance in interpreting the results of additional examinations, etc. Far from being a magic bullet, delegating tasks to AI raises many ethical questions relating in particular to the supervision of algorithms, equal access to innovation and the use of patient data. It is still difficult to predict whether AI will remain a “safety net” for the doctor or if it will supplant him. France and Europe have laid down the principle of “human guarantee” in the interpretation of diagnostic and therapeutic results, implying that the machine cannot act alone and enshrining the responsibility of the health professional. This article aims to understand how complex AI is to regulate legally at the risk of neglecting its secrecy, whether at the individual or collective level.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"volume\":\"2024 186\",\"pages\":\"Pages 50-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739124000071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739124000071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)在医疗领域的发展速度令人印象深刻。人工智能为诊断辅助、预防医学、个性化患者随访、治疗选择支持、辅助解释其他检查结果等方面的新实践铺平了道路。将任务委托给人工智能远非灵丹妙药,但也会引发许多伦理问题,特别是与算法监督、平等参与创新和使用患者数据有关的问题。现在还很难预测,人工智能是继续为医生提供 "安全网",还是取代医生。法国和欧洲在解释诊断和治疗结果时规定了 "人的保证 "原则,这意味着机器不能单独行动,并规定了医疗专业人员的责任。本文旨在了解,无论是在个人层面还是在集体层面,人工智能在法律上的监管是多么复杂,同时又有可能忽视其保密性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Le médecin confronté à l’IA (Intelligence artificielle) : Éthique et responsabilité

Artificial intelligence (AI) is developing at an impressive speed in the field of health. AI paves the way for new practices in diagnostic assistance, preventive medicine, individualized patient follow-up, support in choosing a therapy, assistance in interpreting the results of additional examinations, etc. Far from being a magic bullet, delegating tasks to AI raises many ethical questions relating in particular to the supervision of algorithms, equal access to innovation and the use of patient data. It is still difficult to predict whether AI will remain a “safety net” for the doctor or if it will supplant him. France and Europe have laid down the principle of “human guarantee” in the interpretation of diagnostic and therapeutic results, implying that the machine cannot act alone and enshrining the responsibility of the health professional. This article aims to understand how complex AI is to regulate legally at the risk of neglecting its secrecy, whether at the individual or collective level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medecine & Droit
Medecine & Droit MEDICINE, LEGAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues
期刊最新文献
Contents Contents Parcours de soins rénové, e-santé et maillage officinal : une réponse complexe à la pénurie de médecins Le concept de race : serpent de mer de la pratique médicale La loi du 10 mai 2024 contre les dérives sectaires : application dans le domaine de la santé : séparer le bon grain scientifique de l’ivraie charlatanesque
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1