2020-2022 年护理点检测偏好:历年趋势

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular digital health journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cvdhj.2024.03.002
Sakeina Howard-Wilson DO , Ziyue Wang , Taylor Orwig , Denise Dunlap MS, PhD , Nathaniel Hafer PhD , Bryan Buchholz PhD , Shiv Sutaria MD , David D. McManus MD, ScM , Craig M. Lilly MD
{"title":"2020-2022 年护理点检测偏好:历年趋势","authors":"Sakeina Howard-Wilson DO ,&nbsp;Ziyue Wang ,&nbsp;Taylor Orwig ,&nbsp;Denise Dunlap MS, PhD ,&nbsp;Nathaniel Hafer PhD ,&nbsp;Bryan Buchholz PhD ,&nbsp;Shiv Sutaria MD ,&nbsp;David D. McManus MD, ScM ,&nbsp;Craig M. Lilly MD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of point-of-care (POC) tests prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was relatively infrequent outside of the health care context. Little is known about how public opinions regarding POC tests have changed during the pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We redeployed a validated survey to uncompensated volunteers to assess preferences for point-of-care testing (POCT) benefits and concerns between June and September 2022. We received a total of 292 completed surveys. Linear regression analysis was used to compare differences in survey average response scores (ARSs) from 2020 to 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Respondent ARSs indicated agreement for all 16 POCT benefits in 2022. Of 14 POCT concerns, there were only 2 statements that respondents agreed with most frequently, which were that “Insurance might not cover the costs of the POC test” (ARS 0.9, ± 1.0) and “POC tests might not provide a definitive result” (ARS 0.1, ± 1.0). Additionally, when comparing survey responses from 2020 to 2022, we observed 8 significant trends for POCT harms and benefits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The public’s opinion on POC tests has become more favorable over time. However, concerns regarding the affordability and reliability of POCT results persist. We suggest that stakeholders address these concerns by developing accurate POC tests that continue to improve care and facilitate access to health care for all.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 149-155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693624000148/pdfft?md5=d2feee74a47388b571f02ec9e74c06e7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666693624000148-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-of-care testing preferences 2020–2022: Trends over the years\",\"authors\":\"Sakeina Howard-Wilson DO ,&nbsp;Ziyue Wang ,&nbsp;Taylor Orwig ,&nbsp;Denise Dunlap MS, PhD ,&nbsp;Nathaniel Hafer PhD ,&nbsp;Bryan Buchholz PhD ,&nbsp;Shiv Sutaria MD ,&nbsp;David D. McManus MD, ScM ,&nbsp;Craig M. Lilly MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2024.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of point-of-care (POC) tests prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was relatively infrequent outside of the health care context. Little is known about how public opinions regarding POC tests have changed during the pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We redeployed a validated survey to uncompensated volunteers to assess preferences for point-of-care testing (POCT) benefits and concerns between June and September 2022. We received a total of 292 completed surveys. Linear regression analysis was used to compare differences in survey average response scores (ARSs) from 2020 to 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Respondent ARSs indicated agreement for all 16 POCT benefits in 2022. Of 14 POCT concerns, there were only 2 statements that respondents agreed with most frequently, which were that “Insurance might not cover the costs of the POC test” (ARS 0.9, ± 1.0) and “POC tests might not provide a definitive result” (ARS 0.1, ± 1.0). Additionally, when comparing survey responses from 2020 to 2022, we observed 8 significant trends for POCT harms and benefits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The public’s opinion on POC tests has become more favorable over time. However, concerns regarding the affordability and reliability of POCT results persist. We suggest that stakeholders address these concerns by developing accurate POC tests that continue to improve care and facilitate access to health care for all.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 149-155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693624000148/pdfft?md5=d2feee74a47388b571f02ec9e74c06e7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666693624000148-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693624000148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693624000148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在COVID-19大流行之前,护理点检测(POC)的使用在医疗保健领域之外相对较少。我们在 2022 年 6 月至 9 月期间对无偿志愿者重新进行了一次有效调查,以评估他们对护理点检测(POCT)益处和担忧的偏好。我们共收到 292 份完成的调查问卷。我们使用线性回归分析法比较了 2020 年至 2022 年调查平均响应得分(ARS)的差异。结果受访者的 ARS 显示,他们同意 2022 年所有 16 项 POCT 优点。在 14 项 POCT 关切中,受访者最常同意的只有 2 项陈述,即 "保险可能不包括 POC 检测的费用"(ARS 0.9,± 1.0)和 "POC 检测可能无法提供明确结果"(ARS 0.1,± 1.0)。此外,在比较 2020 年至 2022 年的调查回复时,我们观察到关于 POCT 危害和益处的 8 个显著趋势。然而,人们对 POCT 检测结果的可负担性和可靠性的担忧依然存在。我们建议利益相关者通过开发准确的 POC 检验来解决这些问题,从而继续改善医疗服务,方便所有人获得医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Point-of-care testing preferences 2020–2022: Trends over the years

Background

The use of point-of-care (POC) tests prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was relatively infrequent outside of the health care context. Little is known about how public opinions regarding POC tests have changed during the pandemic.

Methods

We redeployed a validated survey to uncompensated volunteers to assess preferences for point-of-care testing (POCT) benefits and concerns between June and September 2022. We received a total of 292 completed surveys. Linear regression analysis was used to compare differences in survey average response scores (ARSs) from 2020 to 2022.

Results

Respondent ARSs indicated agreement for all 16 POCT benefits in 2022. Of 14 POCT concerns, there were only 2 statements that respondents agreed with most frequently, which were that “Insurance might not cover the costs of the POC test” (ARS 0.9, ± 1.0) and “POC tests might not provide a definitive result” (ARS 0.1, ± 1.0). Additionally, when comparing survey responses from 2020 to 2022, we observed 8 significant trends for POCT harms and benefits.

Conclusion

The public’s opinion on POC tests has become more favorable over time. However, concerns regarding the affordability and reliability of POCT results persist. We suggest that stakeholders address these concerns by developing accurate POC tests that continue to improve care and facilitate access to health care for all.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular digital health journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Determinants of global cardiac implantable electrical device remote monitoring utilization – Results from an international survey Cellular-Enabled Remote Patient Monitoring for Pregnancies Complicated by Hypertension Point-of-care testing preferences 2020–2022: Trends over the years Feasibility of remote monitoring for fatal coronary heart disease using Apple Watch ECGs Artificial intelligence–based screening for cardiomyopathy in an obstetric population: A pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1